As Nancy Pelosi wrapped up her media availability earlier this week an intrepid reporter asked if she would attend the 49ers’ game on Sunday. Her response was met with giggles.
San Fran Nan much too important to attend 49ers game on Sunday
McConnell confronted by protesters at Kentucky restaurant: ‘We know where you live’
6:53 am July 9, 2018
18 Comments
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
HOT TOPICS
Black Lives Matter Holds Rally Supporting Chicago Looters: ‘That is reparations’ 
Chris Wallace says Kamala Harris ‘not far to the left despite what Republicans are going to try to say’ 
Dallas Cowboys’ Jerry Jones pledges ‘grace’ to protesting players during national anthem in 2020 
Seattle’s Socialist City Council Cuts Police Funding With More Cuts To Come 
Neighbors unhappy as riots move east into residential Portland 
Austin cuts police budget by 1/3 amid national ‘defund’ push
Recent Comments
“Where are your protests about the murder of the police officer David Dorn? Where are your protests of a little…”
Comment by
Posted in Protesters plan to march onto Dan Ryan Expressway on Saturday to rally against police brutality Aug 15, 08:31- “Of course Mitt would be for mail in ballots. It’s the only hope he has for getting re-elected. Couldn’t win…”
Comment by
Posted in Mitt Romney slams politicians attacking mail-in voting Aug 15, 08:10 - “Ingrate, an insult to this country and a racist on top of that. Those “little white a****” you speak so…”
Comment by
Posted in Dolly Parton: ‘Do we think our little white asses are the only ones that matter?’ Aug 15, 08:08 
““politicians attacking the vote by mail system are threatening global democracy”,,,,,,That is Romney’s problem, he is more worried about GLOBAL…”
Comment by
Posted in Mitt Romney slams politicians attacking mail-in voting Aug 15, 08:03
She probably thought the reporter asked if she was going to be 49 on Sunday… and not her true age of 149. She has no time for frivolity… she has to concentrate on removing the one thing that is keeping the economy going strong.. keeping illegal aliens from from waltzing across the boarder… making sure evil adversaries hell bent on destroying the country develop nuclear ICB’s… Draining the cesspool in washington… and god forbid… the truth come out of all the illegal and traitorous advances the Regressive Liberal Socialist Democrats has perpetrated on the entire American public. Give her a break… thats alot of work.
Christians are admonished to not just forgive 7 x 7 (49),,,Seven being a Biblically perfect numeral representing spiritual perfection,,,, but 70 times 7 or 490 times. Since Catholic protesting Pelosi cannot even forgive Trump one time, she obviously is NO kind of Christian 49’er, but the San Francisco kind of 49’er devil in disguise. Pelosi herself used up her 490 assigned quota decades ago, along with her child aborted rights to Catholic Communion. She is no longer seen kneeling in Church on Sundays, just in football stadiums along with anti-American Iranian loving Kaepernicks.
She doesn’t even realize she embarrasses herself. She thinks she’s queen. The world sees her as a washed up old woman whose professional life is now dictated by the Squad.
Absolutely Leonidas! The only thing she loves is her beloved gavel. But if you look at her eyes closely, sometimes they appear vacant, struggling, but the intoxicating power keeps her hanging on. The mob squad smell weakness and are awaiting their chance to seize power. . . . and they will.
I pray her end comes swift…
Nancy, I know you have said you are a good Catholic. When God gets ahold of you, Nancy Pro Abortion / Murder of innocent babies in the womb, you are going to be impeached and sent to you know where!!!!!!!!! You will have good company in ****, as Billy Bob and Hillary will be right beside you.
Scary that she’s 3rd in line for the presidency!!
Yea. IMO the speaker of the house shouldn’t even be on that line of succession list.. LET ALONE in 3rd place.
Interesting. Seems perfectly logical, to me. What would be your choice for number three?
Pres
VP
Leader of the senate
President pro-temp senate
Sec state
Sec defense
AG
Sec interior
Sec labor
Sec energy
That’s how i’d set it up.
I’d ALSO set it, that whom ever the party is that holds the presidency, are ONLY those eligible to be on that above list..
>> Leader of the senate <<
I assume you mean the majority leader. Also, by restricting the list to one party, you are bound to skew the results. Additionally, The Speaker of The House would always represent more members of Congress than any senator, even if all 100 senators were of one party.
Yes the Senate majority leader..
But my reasoning for saying they should be the same party, is that i do NOT FEEL that the ‘opposition’ party should get into the white house, just cause the sitting president (and vp) died..
What if the president and vice president are of different parties? After all, that’s how it was, originally. Also, a major candidate could choose an Independent, or a Libertarian as a running mate. I don’t think party affiliation should figure in it.
That may have been the initial intent, but when was the last time you saw a dem take a rep as a running mate, or a rep taking a dem??
OK we really need to get serious here. We need a phrase that captures Pelosi’s particular brand of giddy stupidity.
There are many different flavors of stupid. For example, AOC’s cluelessness matched with her insane overconfidence in the validity of her positions can be described as “smugnorant”. She’s both smug and completely ignorant of all facts involved.
Come on people. Let’s really hash out a proper word that fits Pelosi’s imbecility. There has to be a perfect word or phrase for this condition.
Dr. Gadget,
I believe the perfect word for Nervous Nancy is “Sell Out”. She would sell out anyone who got in front of her precious gavel. She is losing her grip though, no doubt about that. The mob squad have her turned in so many directions she can’t see straight, and it is dreadfully painful to watch her in news conferences. She is all over the map mentally. Makes no sense.
Pelosi is only one more of the already long list of reasons that refuse to support San Francisco in any way.
I don’t disagree about the unlikelihood of different parties, but those who wrote the Constitution tried to envision all possibilities, and I think we should do the same. As to the Senate Majority Leader, not the Speaker of The House, as I pointed out, the Speaker would represent far more members of Congress. The Speaker would represent a minimum of 218 Representatives, while the Senate Majority Leader could represent an improbable (nearly impossible) 100 Senators. I say follow Jefferson’s lead, and think “As unlikely as it is, what would happen if …”