OAKLAND — Thousands of noncitizen parents of Oakland Unified students would be allowed to vote in school board elections if a proposal by city leaders makes it to the ballot and is approved by city residents.
“These are parents of kids in the schools. Shouldn’t they have a say in who runs the school system?” Councilmember Dan Kalb, who intends to shepherd the proposal along with Councilmember Treva Reid, said Tuesday. “It just makes sense.”
If the full council agrees next month and places a measure on the November ballot, city residents will decide whether parents and guardians of children under age 18 get to cast their votes for school board candidates.
As envisioned by Kalb and Reid, the measure would not distinguish between immigrants who have legal residency or work status and those who are undocumented. They said approximately 13,000 people could be eligible to vote.
The idea of expanding voting rights to immigrants who don’t hold citizenship papers isn’t precedent setting.
Citizenship had little bearing on voting rights in the early days of the founding of the U.S., though it became an issue from time to time over the next couple hundred years depending on the sentiment toward immigrants at any given time. While virtually all of the United States have barred noncitizens from voting since the 1920s, federal law does not require that only citizens vote in state or local elections.
In 2016, San Francisco became one of the first cities in recent history to allow noncitizen parents to vote in school board elections.
Earlier this year, New York City allowed legal residents who are not citizens to vote in all municipal elections if they’re green card holders, immigrants under the federal DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) program or have the right to work in the United States.
And in January, the San Jose City Council decided to study the possibility of allowing noncitizens to vote in municipal elections. But they’re not pressing to get a measure on this November’s ballot.
San Jose councilmember and mayoral candidate Dev Davis voted against the idea. In a blog post on her mayoral campaign website, Davis says “voting is a right and responsibility of citizenship” — a view shared by other opponents across the country who believe people must accept the duties of citizenship before they can vote. They also argue that allowing immigrants to vote will remove a motive for seeking citizenship.
In their memo to Oakland City Council and school board members who jointly met on the subject Monday, Kalb and Reid dismissed the sentiment of excluding noncitizens from voting as “rooted in racism and xenophobia.”
Several parents and advocates for immigrant families attended the meeting to support the proposal.
“Currently, people who have the right to vote do not represent all of us,” Mario Rodriguez, the parent of two children in Oakland charter schools, said in Spanish. “Those of us who have children in schools need the political power to make the best decision about the education of our children,” he said.
Another parent, who identified herself on Zoom as Fabiola, said that for six years her son struggled at his Oakland school without the individualized education plan he needed. As an immigrant who does not speak much English, she said, her advocacy for him seemingly went nowhere until very recently.
“His needs were ignored,” she said in Spanish. “Parents like me need to be able to vote so we are not ignored.”
Nunu Kidane, executive director of Priority Africa Network, an Oakland-based organization that works with and represents Black immigrants, said Black immigrant families in Oakland have often felt similarly disconnected.
While Priority Africa Network seeks to help them, Kidane said those families would “like very much an opportunity to have their voices heard on matters of their children’s education.”
This expansion of voting rights would allow them and other immigrants to have more of a say in their children’s education, Kidane explained.
Reid cited data showing that about 13,000 noncitizen parents, guardians and caregivers send their children to Oakland schools. About 3,000 of the district’s 35,000 students are categorized as “newcomers,” meaning they have been in the U.S. for less than three years and have a home language that is not English.
“No parent or guardian should feel ignored,” Reid said. “They want to be seen and heard with their voice and vote.”
That change was estimated to cost an extra $7,000 to $10,000 in printing and work by the Alameda County Registrar of Voters’ office.
It’s unclear what has caused the delay, but Kalb said the parties are “still working to finalize that process.”
Alameda County Registrar of Voters Tim Dupuis did not respond to questions about the status of Measure QQ’s implementation.
Kalb said lessons learned from the delay will be applied if the proposal to let noncitizens vote in school board meetings comes to pass.
©2022 MediaNews Group, Inc. Visit at mercurynews.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
—-
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.
Illegal Immigrants are here in the U.S. illegally and Should NOT be eligible for any social services or the right to vote in ANY elections.
We see why the Democrat Party wants to encourage, support, protect and transport illegal immigrants around the country. TO BUY VOTES!
It will start in allowing illegal immigrants to vote in school board elections, then “New York City is on track to expand the right to vote in local elections to over 800,000 New York City residents who are living and working here legally, making the city the largest jurisdiction in the country to offer voting rights to noncitizens. The new law took effect at the stroke of midnight Sunday, 30-days after it was passed by the City Council. It will enable anyone who has legally been living in the city for 30-days to register and vote in local elections.”
Now we see WHY the Socialist Democrat Party is encouraging, importing, supporting, protecting and transporting multi millions of illegal immigrants into the U.S.. Some Democrat ruled States even give illegal immigrants Drivers Licensees.
They’re flat out BRINGING THEM IN by the thousands.. ALL TO SWELL their voter rolls..
VOTING IN OUR ELECTIONS IS A PRIVILEGE RESERVED FOR LEGITIMATE CITIZENS ONLY !!!!!
YOU CAN’T TALK ELECTION INTEGRITY ON THE ONE HAND AND THEN TURN AROUND AND EXTEND VOTING PRIVILEGES TO NON-CITIZENS ON THE OTHER.
VOTING is a RIGHT for Citizens only..
PERIOD!
“These are parents of kids in the schools. Shouldn’t they have a say in who runs the school system?”
NO! HELL NO! WHICH PART OF “NO” DIDN’T YOU UNDERSTAND?
Wait, i thought DEMS THOUGHT PARENTS WHO WANTED a say in the schools, were TERRORISTS?
Well said; amen!
The 14 th amendment. Says who is a citizen and illegals are not a citizen
All persons born or Nationalized in the United States ,and subject to the jurisdiction therefore, are citizens of the United States and state where in the reside. Now with , and the word”and” let’s explain the 14 amendment.
All person born or Nationalized ,and subject to the jurisdiction. It doesn’t say anyone subject to the jurisdiction but born or Nationalized. So only born or Nationalized ,illegals are neither. Then the Constitution uses the word “and”for citizens of the U.S. And state. And means both. So you can’t Be a citizen of a state without being a U.S.. citizen. Right ??
See above comment
I’m not a lawyer, just a person reading the Constitution.
Let s talk about “in the Jurisdiction” . Does anyone remember the Mexican national who was found guilty of murder and sentence to death ? ? Mexico doesn’t have a death sentence. Mexico complain about not being able to help it’s citizens so the courts reaffirmed that he was still a Mexican citizen and he was still under the jurisdiction of the Mexican government. So therefore illegals are still under the Jurisdiction of the country they camefrom.
If you go to Mexico for example. Are you then a Mexican citizen ? No your still a citizen of the us. And the U.S. Government has a Right to help you.So illegals are not citizens of the state they are illegally living in
>> “They want to be seen and heard with their voice and vote.” <<
Fine. Do it in English, which, by the way, also happens to be one of the requirements for citizenship.
Though these days, it seems that requirement got flushed down the toilet along with many other rules, dems don’t want illegals to have to follow.