WASHINGTON (AP) — A lawyer for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign was acquitted Tuesday of lying to the FBI when he pushed information meant to cast suspicions on Donald Trump and Russia in the run-up to the 2016 election.
The jury in the case of Michael Sussmann deliberated on Friday afternoon and Tuesday morning before reaching its verdict.
The case was the first courtroom test of special counsel John Durham since his appointment three years ago to search for government misconduct during the investigation into potential ties between Russia and Trump’s 2016 campaign. The verdict represents a setback for Durham’s work, especially since Trump supporters had looked to the probe to expose what they contend was sweeping wrongdoing by the FBI.
The trial focused on whether Sussmann, a cybersecurity attorney and former federal prosecutor, concealed from the FBI that he was representing Clinton’s campaign when he presented computer data that he said showed a possible secret backchannel between Russia-based Alfa Bank and Trump’s business company, the Trump Organization. The FBI investigated but quickly determined that there was no suspicious contact.
The bureau’s then-general counsel and the government’s star witness, James Baker, testified that he was “100% confident” that Sussmann had told him that he was not representing any client during the meeting. Prosecutors say he was actually acting on behalf of the Clinton campaign and another client, and that he hid that information so as to make it seem more credible and to boost the chances of getting the FBI to investigate.
Lawyers for Sussmann deny that he lied, saying that it was impossible to know with certainty what he told Baker since they were the only participants in the meeting and neither of them took notes.
They argued that if Sussmann said he wasn’t acting on the Clinton campaign’s behalf that that was technically accurate since he didn’t ask the FBI to take any particular action. And they said that even if he did make a false statement, it was ultimately irrelevant since the FBI was already investigating Russia and the Trump campaign and would have looked into the Alfa Bank data no matter the source.
During the two-week trial, jurors heard from current and former FBI officials who described efforts to assess the data’s legitimacy as well as former Clinton campaign aides.
The original Trump-Russia investigation, overseen for two years by former special counsel Robert Mueller, found multiple efforts by Russia to interfere on the Trump campaign’s behalf but did not establish that the two sides had worked together to sway the election.
After Mueller’s work was done, then-Attorney General William Barr named a new Justice Department prosecutor, then-Connecticut U.S. Attorney Durham, to examine whether anyone from the FBI or other agencies violated the law as the government opened its investigation into Russian election interference and the Trump campaign.
Durham has remained at work into the Biden administration. He has brought three cases so far, though the one against Sussmann is the only to have reached trial. A former FBI lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, was given probation after pleading guilty in 2020 to altering an email related to the surveillance of an ex-Trump campaign aide, and a Russian analyst who contributed to a dossier of Democratic-funded research into ties between Russia and Trump awaits trial on charges of lying to the FBI about his sources of information.
____
Follow Eric Tucker on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/etuckerAP
Copyright 2022 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without permission.
The Untouchables
Real-life version
Untouchable maybe. Immortal no.
I agree!! SMDH!!
FOOLS, every one of those jurors..
Maybe BLM and antifa are right. Street justice is the only justice.
IT certainly seems since obozo was in charge, that the LACK OF TRUE JUSTICE in this nation, has gone down the crapper..
Why does this make me feel like it was all “STAGED”, maybe because they could not find a better charge.
nothing matters in america anymore, truth and justice for all is all total bs.
jan 6th is all the demoncrats care about the total destruction of trump and conservative god fearing americans .
i will bet you money the november election has already been decided , rigged , stolen.
I HOPE AND pray you are wrong!
Ituser, God is still in control. He is giving this country what we deserve. We have turned our backs on Him, shut Him our of our lives, we are getting what we asked for.
The Only reason that the Jury Acquired him is because they didn’t want to be one the One’s that they will find at the Bottom of the Lake. Like this has never happened under the Control of the Clinton’s Hands. They don’t let anyone stand in their WAY.! Lol ! The Clinton’s will Survive until Satan calls them Home !
IF they are too bloody scared to sit on jurys, then they should have asked to be excused!
Whoever said crime don’t pay has never met the Clinton’s. We have met many of those who protect them.
Any political trial held in DC will be resolved by activist liberal juries. The Left has the presidency, Congress and at least in DC, they own the courts.
No one in this country thought that a democrat tried in a DC court would be convicted for anything, especially if a Clinton is involved.
The dems run the whole show. They are just CCP in that they never want to be shown that something isn’t right. PRAVDA!!! Chinese style!
The trial happened in Washington DC where the judge had ties to the Clintons and many of the jurors also had ties to the Clintons. Looks like this was “fixed” from the beginning.
Durham hasn’t “pegged” one solid BIG STINKING FISH in all of the time he’s had to investigate those treasonous ********! We the People will NEVER trust any facet of government ever again!
Which brings me back to the question i had last year.. WHY THE HELL HAS THIS TAKEN SO LONG, for so LITTLE OUTCOME???