Home The Loft Target, Trump, and NBA are Wrong about Men in Women's Restrooms... Here's Why...

Target, Trump, and NBA are Wrong about Men in Women’s Restrooms… Here's Why…

April 23, 2016 at 7:13 am 121 The Loft
Share!

Over the decades, the left has continued to push its agenda and has met little (if no) resistance. One person is offended by a prayer in school, but the rest of the people aren’t? Prayer is gone. One person is offended by a nativity scene, but the rest aren’t? The nativity scene is gone. Now, the left (in the form of the media and corporate America) are claiming that men who think they are women should be allowed in women’s restrooms. We know they are wrong, and here’s why. But will we do anything about it?

In listing the reasons why men who think or pretend that they are women should not be allowed in women’s restrooms, this could actually be the shortest column I’ve ever written. The reason: common sense. There. Done. All finished. Right?

Unfortunately, the left does not care at all about common sense or common decency. They are all about pushing aside values and replacing them with government mandates. In the name of “tolerance,” they are telling us how we can think, what we can say, and what we can do. It’s wrong, but in this case, they have gone too far, and this could (and should) be our opportunity to fight back.

The NBA has threatened to pull the All-Star Game out of North Carolina unless the state’s bathroom law is repealed. Think about it… a corporation is telling a state to override the will of the people because it passed a law stating that men should use the men’s restroom and women should use the women’s restroom. This is what the NBA is up in arms about!

Target has come out in support of that small, small percentage of people who are born one way but claim to be the other gender. They have said that women’s rooms are open to men and vice versa. They are wrong.

When asked about this issue, Donald Trump said that transgenders should use whatever restroom they want to use.

“Leave it the way it is. North Carolina, what they’re going through with all the business that’s leaving, all of the strife — and this is on both sides. Leave it the way it is,” he said. “There have been very few complaints the way it is. People go. They use the bathroom that they feel is appropriate. There has been so little trouble. And the problem with what happened in North Carolina is the strife and the economic — I mean, the economic punishment that they’re taking.”

First of all, Trump is basically saying that because big corporations are against it, North Carolina should not stand up for common sense and common decency. Wrong. In addition, Trump states that there have been “very few complaints.” Does he listen to the news at all? Does he listen to what actual conservatives say? And finally, the topper… he said that there has been “so little trouble.” Oh really?

Just a few months ago, a man was arrested for assaulting a six-year-old girl in a mall restroom. Yep… he walked right in there.

In 2014, a Toronto man who claimed to be transgender assaulted multiple women at women’s shelters.

Christopher Hambrook, 37, leaned on the ever expanding legal “rights” offered to people who “identify” with the sex opposite their biology. Under the name “Jessica,” he was able to get into the women’s shelters, where he sexually assaulted several women in 2012, the Toronto Sun reports.

Court heard how one woman awoke to find Hambrook assaulting her on her bed. “Her tights had been pulled down past her bottom and her bathing suit had been pulled to the side,” court documents reveal. “She yelled at the accused, demanding to know what he was doing. He simply covered his face with his hands, said ‘Oops!’ and started giggling.”

In other news, at Napa Valley College, a man sexually assaulted a woman in the women’s restroom.

Do you need more examples? Ok… here’s another. A homeless man in Houston sexually assaulted a 12-year-old girl in the restroom of a CVS store.

The list goes on and on and on. The cases are actually quite easy to find.

And here’s the point to keep in mind. We aren’t talking about good, old fashioned transvestites — men dressing up like women — we are talking about transgenders, and the new left-wing phrase “gender identity.” (It seems like every year, there’s a new phrase that the left invents just to justify it’s radical thinking.)

Gender identity means that if a man thinks or pretends to be a woman, then that’s ok. That’s his “gender identity.” It has absolutely nothing to do with how he acts or how he dresses (according to the left), but it’s simply a state of mind. Why do I mention this? Because this means that a man wearing “man” clothes can pretend to be a woman without even trying to look like one. And the NBA, Target, Trump, and others want to make it even easier for men to walk right into women’s restrooms.

Are we going to have a “gender identity” cop stationed at each restroom to verify that the man thinks he’s a woman before he can walk in? Of course not. So, the left is opening themselves up to any depraved guy just walking into women’s restrooms under the guise of being a “transgender.” This is just an open invitation to sexual predators.

It’s really unfortunate that example after example after example of incidents have to be listed. This is common sense! Men are men, and women are women! What they act like or pretend to be is their problem! It certainly should not take up taxpayer money to debate legislation to protect the vast majority of us. This issue should not be rammed down our throats by corporate America and left-wing entertainers.

Fight back folks! Boycott these companies. Stand with North Carolina and other states. We the people are more powerful than any corporation. We just have to be the vocal majority, so that corporate America will stop listening to the vocal fringe.

VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 9.7/10 (36 votes cast)

Target, Trump, and NBA are Wrong about Men in Women’s Restrooms… Here's Why…, 9.7 out of 10 based on 36 ratings

Print Friendly
Share!


Please leave a comment below.


121 Comments

  1. inluminatuo April 23, 2016 at 9:13 am

    The government should NEVER get into the business of legislating morality, for any kind of morality. This is the social sphere of the Church. The government IS supposed to be in the business of legislating laws to protect WE THE PEOPLE from acts of IMMORALITY, like theft, murder, social unrest, lawbreaking, and sexual perversion which refutes and attacks our American rights to personal privacy, which thanks to the sick mind twisted liberals would give us no privacy, not even in the privy. These Secular Socialists have only increased theft through government tax confiscation, murder through STS’s, abortion, Drugs and disease, street riots, and sick twisted unproductive sexual practices that endangered the very health of the nation, which begs the necessity for more government wealth confiscation of WE THE PEOPLE through Obamacare and a national healthcare program. The danger of socialism is that they would turn the world upside down, make bad become good, or at least acceptable, good becomes the new enemy where Men, not God are able to redefine what is moral and immoral, despite the last 4000 years of proven human trial and error as to what works socially and what does not. THEY are the enemy and fight them in the streets, at the ballot box or you will soon be fighting them inside your home within your own bedrooms and bathrooms in a Liberal “Bed, Bath, and beyond” world that is beyond sanity or beyond workable tenets.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.6/5 (19 votes cast)
    • jeremyvotaw April 23, 2016 at 10:05 am

      Every law is based on morality. I’m amused when people say the government shouldn’t legislate morality, but are fine with laws against murder, or stealing.

      Also, I’ve yet to see a mention of an actual transgender person doing anything nefarious? What I see are people who did horrible things, who obviously don’t care about laws because the last time I checked, sexual assault is still a crime. If they didn’t care about that law, what makes you think they care about misdemeanor transgender bathroom laws?

      The same people who say gun laws doesn’t stop criminals from getting guns are the same people who think bathroom laws will keep out sexual predators.

      How’s that for common sense? Hypocrites.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 2.4/5 (22 votes cast)
    • hpinnc April 23, 2016 at 10:19 am

      I take issue with your first statement,illuminatuo. The government is already in the business of legislating morality. The socialist/marxist/communist left has stuck their noses in just about every facet of our Christian/Judaeo values.Then you have liberal/progressive companies like Target, NBA, liberal musicians who have a huge influence on the populace, especially our young & gullible young people. I am in full support of Gov. McCrory. You would think 99% of the people of NC would be too, but turns out there are more liberal/socialist/progressives in NC than I thought. I don’t know what is so complicated about the plumbing apparatus of the male & female anatomy. Any who don’t know what gender they are, can go like they’ve been going, if they sit on the commode go into the female,if they stand in front of a urinal, go into the male, if you are a female who stands & wets all over the seat, then stay home & pee on tour own toilet seat. The more the left can complicate things to the point that “common sense” no longer applies, the better they like it.It is time for good, decent, moral people to stand up for our rights, & stop letting the small minority make decisions that affects the vast majority.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.5/5 (18 votes cast)
    • Karel74 April 23, 2016 at 11:34 am

      Nor have transgenders been expelled from public restrooms. In other words, there is no need for the regulations passed by the Left, as in NYC by the soon to be convicted progressive Mayor DeBlasio, demanding that the general public officially accept that there are no genuine distinctions between the sexes and accept whomever using whatever public restroom. Without those actions in the first place, laws like NCs would not be necessary. It is a tiny minority on the Left that is imposing their values on society.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.6/5 (9 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 11:34 am

      I think YOU’RE missing the point, jeremyvotaw . The point is, yes, sexual predators sometimes ignore laws and walk right into the ladies room in search of victims. But at least NOW when they do it, there’s a pretty high chance somebody will see them and challenge them BEFORE they’re able to harm anybody.

      But these new laws make it EASIER for them to do so, and they won’t be challenged or prevented EVER, because nobody will be allowed to question them “walking right in”. How is that “equal protection under the law”, when EVERY female using a public bathroom facility is put at risk so that a FEW perverts confused about what gender they are can take their pick of bathrooms? And when did this get to be a “right”? I don’t recall ANYTHING in the Constitution about a “right” to change your gender, or declare yourself a gender other than the one you were born with, much LESS the “right” to force everybody ELSE to accommodate your “choice” in whatever loony way you dream up! The liberal left are inventing “rights” faster than society can adjust to them–the better to violate the REAL rights of everybody else in the name of fictitious “rights” that don’t exist except in the delusional minds of the LOONY LEFT.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.5/5 (18 votes cast)
    • 7789361 April 23, 2016 at 11:43 am

      Morality has always been legislated in Western Democracies. When we were a State sanctioned Christian Civilization things were not perfect, but they were slowly getting better. School teachers led their students in The Lord’s Prayer, and taught the absolutes of The Ten Commandments. Absolutes imply antithesis. Parents and school teachers had the same values, and one could tell children to be good, and while they might not have always followed your advice, at least they would have understood what you were talking about.

      This all changed when Christianity was decreed Unconstitutional starting in 1962, and so-called “neutral” Secular Humanism with its values became the State sanctioned God that we now trusted. Many Secular Christian Clergy, Seminaries and secular Christians said great, now we will have a mission field at our front door. Some mission field, and secular religious worldview that says it’s “neutral” and imposes its values using adult school teachers,starting with Kindergarteners,by Government Legislation.

      Secular Christian Clergy rip off their followers,claiming to cure them of cancer and other inflictions, and when these hurting people are not cured they say to them, that they didn’t have enough faith. Just like Wall Street ripped off our dreams, and got rewarded. Secular Christian is an oxymoron, and Secular Humanism as our New God is legislating perversion. Political apathy has caused this decay. Will we let it continue?

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.4/5 (9 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 2:28 pm

      Very true teabag.. All these laws are going to do (those which Protect and encourage the mentally challenged that question what sex they are), is allow for MORE of these incidents to happen (such as already happened in the above article’s examples).. BUT as we keep seeing time and time again, facts and examples won’t ever matter to the left. Those ‘victims’ are just sacrificed on the alter of PCness.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.6/5 (11 votes cast)
    • SilenceDogood1957 April 23, 2016 at 8:39 pm

      inluminatuo, You really need to think this through. The guy just using the facilities in front of little girls is bad enough. Gender separation in public facilities is common in most cultures, not just those with judo-christian underpinnings. I realize that European countries started the unisex trend it began to be forced upon us. But it is still relatively new (historically speaking). Most men and women prefer to segregate, even in large unisex bathrooms they tend to congregate in one end or the other.

      jeremyvotaw, Hypocrites? Really? You obviously do not understand the law. No, it will not stop all perverts. But do we need to roll out the red carpet for them? With this law, women can have a leg to stand on in keeping them out. 100% effective? No. But it is a step in the right direction. Your compassion to gun laws is also ludicrous. Totally different subject. Allowing perverts into whichever restroom they choose is like banning honest people from owning weapons, and giving guns to the criminals. Requiring them to use the bathroom of their birth arms provides a tool for the innocent to protect themselves, and a reason for law enforcement to intervene before a tragedy.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.6/5 (10 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 24, 2016 at 3:33 pm

      Heck silence.. I don’t even remember seeing any mass uni-sex toilets anywhere i have been. Europe, mid east, orient (Oki and Japan)..

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
    • geoinsd April 25, 2016 at 3:12 pm

      jeremyvotaw is an idiot. There is a big difference between criminals who ignore gun laws and male perverts going into female restrooms/locker rooms. Because of those bathroom laws, the pervert who doesn’t belong that cannot be kicked out. If someone sees a suspicious man following an unaccompanied little girl into a public bathroom, he/she cannot report it because of such laws. Without such laws, we can say, “No sir. You are not following that unaccompanied girl into the bathroom.”

      This is common sense, which jeremyvotaw obviously lacks.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • not2late April 28, 2016 at 8:29 am

      Reply to Jeremy; you’re right, they are not going to care about misdemeanor transgender bathroom laws but they will be much easier to spot when they are trying to sneak into a lady’s restroom.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  2. LiveFree1200cc April 23, 2016 at 9:38 am

    Great article, well written using 100% common sense (rare these days). Now if we could all get back to an actually important issue like the flood of illegals that are taking American jobs and their tax money…….or the messed up welfare system that literally begged and enticed them to come here in the first place

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.3/5 (14 votes cast)
    • yessir April 23, 2016 at 12:19 pm

      This bathroom stuff is distracting from the real issues. Besides, we already have laws against assault and anyone who would assault people would not think twice (or at all) about dressing as the opposite gender to go into a bathroom to attack someone. If we’re going to have laws against use of public restrooms it should be that all restrooms be single-use either-sex.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.8/5 (4 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 1:16 pm

      You would THINK that would suffice, yessir, but . . . no. The left wants to redefine and force everybody ELSE to ACCEPT their definition of “normal”, and THAT is the reason for inventing these nonexistent and RIDICULOUS “rights” that fly in the face of common sense, then LEGISLATING them into existence and declaring ANYBODY who does not agree and approve of what they have done a “bigot”, “homophobe”, “prude”, etc. etc.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.6/5 (10 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 2:33 pm

      Too damn true. IF common sense wasn’t so endangered these days, there wouldn’t BE a need for society and politicians to make laws protecting the RIGHTS of the majority over the non-existent rights of the minority to decide what sex they are/are not.. And we COULD get back to more important matters.

      BUT since the left does all it can to kill OFF common sense, and rewrite what is normal we DO have to spend time on this stupidity rather than focus on what is more pressing.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (6 votes cast)
  3. jimdandi April 23, 2016 at 9:51 am

    It’s all very simple. Unless you are a moron. If you have a penis, use the men’s room. If you have a vagina, use the ladies’ room. Not very complicated. Sorry to have to be so blunt, but let’s get real.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.8/5 (23 votes cast)
    • shanett April 23, 2016 at 12:00 pm

      If Kaitlin is in the women’s bathroom, I don’t see any problems, remember we don’t have urinals! On the OTHER hand , IF a young male looking as much as a female as Kaitlin, he could get killed walking into the “men’s” bathroom! I really don’t think the problem is as big as they want to make it. IMO, they should have left it alone and get to more needed issues, facing the USA!

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.1/5 (7 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 1:18 pm

      Well, YES, shanette, that would be the “common sense” approach. But that would not allow the LOONY LEFT to define what is “normal” and “acceptable” and pass laws to force the REST of us to accept their views, now would it!

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.3/5 (6 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 1:38 pm

      Shanett, while it is true that ladies’ bathrooms don’t have urinals, I’m betting a new law will SOON be passed MANDATING that they DO–you know, to accommodate the wishes of those transgender “females” with their original parts who wish to use a urinal rather than being “forced” to go hide in a stall.

      After all, where is the fun of forcing everybody to accommodate your tiny minority if you can’t REALLY get in their face and SHOW them just how much control and power over them you have? Which is, of course, what ALL these idiotic laws about Gay Marriage, Transgender Bathrooms, etc. are designed to do.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.4/5 (8 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 2:36 pm

      I too wouldn’t be surprised to see them push that as the next goal.. to get urinals put into women’s toilets, so the “its” going in there can still stand up when they go…

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)
    • yessir April 23, 2016 at 3:45 pm

      Yes, it’s simple, but since no one in their right mind would want to have crotch checks to use a bathroom, people should use the restroom of the gender they “look like.” Nor does someone else using the communal (disgusting/degrading) bathroom I am in mean I approve of anything about them. THIS IS A NON-ISSUE FOLKS! It’s meant to keep you from seeing what the Plutocrats are doing to your jobs and your assets and retirement!

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 2.3/5 (6 votes cast)
  4. Amy Lewis April 23, 2016 at 10:03 am

    If people want to be who they think they are, fine. They will have to give an account. Please, let the women’s bathroom be for women and the men’s bathroom be for men. Let’s not allow the fox into the hen house. We already have enough sexual crimes in this country as well as world wide.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.1/5 (13 votes cast)
    • baitfish April 24, 2016 at 6:19 am

      Thank you Amy. Maybe when enough normal women speak out, this nonsense will end. This is more of a war on women, than anything that has ever happened in the past, and the puking progressives are the one’s pushing it.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.8/5 (4 votes cast)
  5. John L Barker April 23, 2016 at 10:11 am

    I am sure Gov. Huckabee would not mind me quoting him “use the bathroom your momma told you to use”

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.7/5 (12 votes cast)
    • connie57 January 30, 2017 at 5:03 pm

      I am a genuine female, a wife and mother. And I live in North Carolina where there is all the protest about the HB2 “bathroom bill.” It was drafted by the state legislature in response to a new city ordinance in Charlotte saying that any person who “feels” like a transgender can use any bathroom, locker room, or shower room. The person does not need any certification from a doctor. HB2 overruled the Charlotte city ordinance, and I am thankful. It is once again possible to order a man to leave the ladies’ room immediately. I do think it would be useful to have a private “any gender” bathroom so a father or grandfather can take his little girl on an outing and be able to properly chaperon the child. Oh, and by the way, I have refused to shop at Target since they made all bathrooms and fitting rooms open to everyone.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  6. Stefan Semchyshyn April 23, 2016 at 10:28 am

    Much like the bicycle in the garage does not make it a car. Hillary giving a speech to the Jewish group does not make her Jewish and carrying the hot sauce does not make Hillary Black. All those perverted nuts better start thinking what they are saying and doing. Like Amy Lewis said let’s not allow the fox into the hen house.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.6/5 (10 votes cast)
  7. disqus_DW3qxKdlwn April 23, 2016 at 10:28 am

    Oh you conservatives going to punish Trump by withdrawing their supports from Trump. Whoopie Doo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    NBA and others telling NC that if NC don’t repeal those unjust laws, they won’t come to NC. Are you hypocrites telling me that NC has their rights, but NBA don’t have their rights to stay the eff out of NC? GET OVER IT!!!!!!
    Trump has his supporters who will practically vote for Trump even if Trump is shooting off his machine gun at them trying to prevent them from voting. One more thing: They could give a rat’s behind over NC bathroom law. DEAL WITH IT!!!!!!!

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 2.4/5 (9 votes cast)
    • willmc777 April 23, 2016 at 2:20 pm

      @disqus_DW3qxKdlwn I find it amazing that Trump supporters will admit to being so brainless of your support, that you’ll admit you’d vote for him even if he was shooting at you on the way to the voting booth. It’s just so funny to me that Trumpsters are so willing to prove to everyone they really are the political equivalent of zombies, minus a few I.Q. points.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 2.7/5 (3 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 2:40 pm

      I am one of those ‘trumpettes’ and i have said in both the other threads on this, that Trump has lost my vote cause of his insane stance..

      NOT all of us are braindead like you two seem to feel.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.3/5 (6 votes cast)
    • hpinnc April 23, 2016 at 4:57 pm

      We don’t give a “rat’s behind” about your stupid opinion!!!! Note: this post intended for @disqus & sillmc777

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.7/5 (6 votes cast)
    • disqus_DW3qxKdlwn April 25, 2016 at 9:28 am

      @hpinnc: Just get use to us expressing our opinions. After all, we liberals are no less Americans than any of you and we aim to defend and exercise our American rights and if you don’t like it, it’s tough beans for you!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  8. Realworldviews April 23, 2016 at 10:44 am

    Wait a minute – a man assaulted a child in the restroom at a mall? How??? There were laws and regulation against that? (it’s the same argument that people on here make every time there’s a shooting in a gun control area – but the situation is reversed). You do realize that there’s nothing to stop anyone from going in to any restroom they choose other than the potential for a slap on the wrist? it’s real simple – you are concerned about your young daughter going into a public restroom and you see someone going in there that concerns you (male, female, transgender, whatever), then you do the same thing – you go check on them. You make it seem like as long as this law is in place you should just tell your little one to go run off and do whatever…there’s laws against the bad people.
    So be a parent and take care of your kids. In the meantime, quit trying to legislate your bigotry based on your own morals.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 2.8/5 (8 votes cast)
    • Karel74 April 23, 2016 at 11:12 am

      You do that, go check on your dghtr because somebody you, you transphobic, arachic gender thinker, looked “inappropriate” for that bathroom and you are discriminatory and open for a lawsuit.

      Since no transgenders have been expelled from restrooms there is no need for regulations pushed by the Left, haters of traditional values, to guarantee their “right” to the restroom of their choice. This 100% about a tiny handful pushing their values upon the society.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.4/5 (8 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 11:44 am

      “. . . quit trying to legislate your bigotry based on your own morals.”

      Realworldview, I think you have it backwards. The people who are trying to legislate their bigotry based on their own “morals”–or lack of same–are the liberal LOONS decreeing that anybody may use any bathroom they please, regardless of how it offends and/or harms anybody ELSE. This is a fabricated “right” made out of thin air and leftist determination to control everybody and force them to dance to whatever tune they decide to play, no matter HOW insane it might be.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.4/5 (7 votes cast)
    • hpinnc April 23, 2016 at 8:20 pm

      You lost me on that last sentence when you accuse me of being bigotry for being a parent if I go inside a BR to check on my kid. I don’t see how that is bigotry unless you are a pervert & think you ought to be able to dress like a female & go into the female BR.If you are accusing me of being bigotry because I oppose freaks & perverts from going into a public BR besides the one they should go in [ and they know which one to go in ] then call me a bigot, because that’s what I am. I do not have to like you or patronize your perverted ways.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.3/5 (7 votes cast)
    • hpinnc April 23, 2016 at 8:57 pm

      realworldview Your post makes no sense to me. If I go check on my daughter in the ladies room, I am a bigot trying to impose my morals on others. I would probably send my wife or at least knock before I went charging in. I don’t follow your logic at all.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 24, 2016 at 3:42 pm

      I think his “Bigot views” was in relation to not wanting men to be allowed into women’s restrooms or showers. BUT bigoted is not the correct word here. Since by Dictionary.com being a Bigot, means
      [a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions:]

      Which sure seems like practically EVERYone on the left.. Since they are most assuredly intolerant of anyone else’s opinion!

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
  9. Karel74 April 23, 2016 at 11:00 am

    Trump’s point that there has been no incidents, and that includes expulsion of transgenders from public restrooms, is the point. Then why is anyone passing regulations that demand the general public officially accept them in any public restroom? The real purpose of these acts is to impose the extreme Left’s extreme points of view and values upon the general public.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.3/5 (9 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 11:50 am

      If Trump’s meaning is that transgenders are ALREADY using the bathrooms of their choice without incident–because they go in dressed as women and/or men, enter a stall, do their business and LEAVE–then I agree. There is no need to pass laws for or against what is already happening without problems.

      But that applies equally to the leftist LOONS who want to LEGISLATE that process and shove it in everybody’s face as in, “We VILL do this and you VILL agree and approve. Heil Hitler!” then they should ALSO butt out and stop trying to pass laws protecting non-existent “rights” that infringe on EVERYBODY. They would LOVE to get everybody accustomed to having their privacy violated at will, because once they do, they can pass many OTHER laws controlling your every action and thought.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.4/5 (5 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 2:45 pm

      As this article though shows, there HAS been incidents, and one of them is directly attributed TO the TG’s push to force places to allow ‘self identifiers’ to go use what rooms they please…

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
  10. lillitulip237 April 23, 2016 at 11:14 am

    Now a woman cannot go to the bathroom, how sick is this? Our country is the laughing stock of the world. Stupid Americans. Only women should be in the woman’s rest rooms. Keep the pervs out.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.4/5 (7 votes cast)
  11. Matthew Jacobs April 23, 2016 at 11:30 am

    LADIES, IS THIS A BIG PROBLEM FOR YOU?
    Have you ever been in a Restroom and thought the other person seemed a tad Masculine? Did you feel threatened, how did you feel about it, if at all? Or was it no big deal, soon to be forgotten?

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 3.3/5 (3 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 11:57 am

      Matthew Jacobs, it was no big problem as long as nobody was making an issue of it, but now that the leftist loons have decided to MAKE a big issue of it–as in, “the biggest, hairiest male in creation can waltz in, haul out his dong and pee right in front of you, and there is not a THING you can do about it–it’s the LAW”, then YES, it is a problem.

      Transgenders are ALREADY using bathrooms in “live and let live” fashion–“passing” as whatever gender they claim to be and behaving accordingly. There is NO REASON to pass laws MANDATING bathroom preference except to pander to a tiny minority by tyrannizing everybody ELSE into agreeing with and approving their choice–and THAT is what is unacceptable about the government deciding to codify this made-up “right” with new laws. That is the only reason I can see for these “in your face” laws that you “must” recognize every perversion on the planet as “normal”.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.2/5 (6 votes cast)
    • Matthew Jacobs April 23, 2016 at 12:04 pm

      oleteabag, I totally agree with you.
      Curious…Are you a He or She?

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 1:21 pm

      I’m a she, Matthew — by BIRTH AND by choice! 😀

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 2:50 pm

      Though i am a man through and through, i HAVE known females who got ‘antsy’ cause guys were in their restrooms or changing rooms. EVEN when that guy was there for lawful and recognized reasons (such as Myself in several incidences in ET school where i was tasked as building maintenance and was in barracks, and had to go onto the ‘girls level’ to replace several lights, or redo a few power outlets).. YES several of the gals there had NO issue with it, heck 2 flat out walked by, greeted me, tossed their towels to the side and entered the showers in FULL VIEW of me ( I even thought i saw one of them wink my way, but that’s neither here nor there). BUT there were others who did chat to the Barracks manager about it..

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  12. larry_sparks April 23, 2016 at 11:41 am

    We need to boycott NBA, ESPN, target and anybody else that is trying to force this immoral transgender bathroom issue into society. The 99% of the people must push back these liberal fascist.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 3.9/5 (7 votes cast)
  13. Jacobite2 April 23, 2016 at 11:44 am

    “Any stick will do to beat a dog.” In this case, the “dog” is normal, white, Christian Americans. The “stick” is anything near and dear to normal, white Christian Americans — religion, history, customs, language, culture, etc.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.3/5 (6 votes cast)
  14. southernpatriot April 23, 2016 at 11:50 am

    A few days ago, a neighbor reluctantly went with his wife and 10 year daughter to Target to shop for an outfit for the daughter to wear at an “end of school” party. His wife persuaded him to go to buy a new khaki shirt and pants, which he liked to wear to work daily. He was tired and wanted to just anchor his LaZBoy chair but something just told him to go. He thought it was to make sure the shirt and pants fit him.

    While sitting on the bench outside the Women’s Fitting Rooms, waiting for his daughter to try on her third outfit, he noticed what he thought at first was a “big boned woman” pass in front of him heading to the fitting room next to his daughter. He looked up as this “woman” passed and saw “her” hands. Hairy hand and knuckles. He was at first startled for a second, then he jumped up and moved quickly to stand between the two fitting rooms. His daughter came out at that moment and all saw this man dressed as a woman enter the other fitting room. They alerted the women’s wear manager and she said, “It is now company policy.”

    My neighbor took his wife and daughter out the front door, not buying anything, and went to JCPenney and bought what they needed. He told the store manager on a subsequent telephone call that he would never be back in another Target store, nor would his family.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.4/5 (8 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 2:54 pm

      Good on them. Bad on target. heck i was surprised i didn’t read that the ‘father got escorted out of the store for raising a ruckus about the TG just waltzing in like that’…

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
    • sotheseedsofliberty2 April 24, 2016 at 9:04 pm

      I would not vote for anyone that thought it was ok for men to use the ladies rest rooms, I would not be a member of a political party and vote for their candidates for office who promoted and agreed with permitting men to use the ladies rest rooms. If they from either party are so dumb as to not understand why there has always been separate Bathrooms for males and females, then I have a total lack of confidence in their mental capabilities and I certainly wouldn’t vote for them.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
    • Cheryl Herritt April 25, 2016 at 4:56 pm

      Good for him. I’ll never shop at target again. These guys aren’t fooling anyone. I don’t care how great the disguise is, you can always tell. It’s tragic that we now live in a society that values the demands of these freaks and criminals over the safety and security of our children and women. People need to start speaking up and fighting back. American values are on a downward spiral. It’s tragic.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  15. quacker April 23, 2016 at 12:05 pm

    Don’t just talk about boycotting Target and others. Go to http://www.afa.net and sign the Boycott Target pledge. Now we just need similar pledges for the NBA, the NFL, PayPal, Bruce Springsteen, …

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)
    • southernpatriot April 23, 2016 at 1:51 pm

      quaker: Thank you. Great idea. My extended family and I have signed the pledge and forwarded it to over 400 on our email list.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 2:57 pm

      Signed as well.. As of my signing, there was over 340k signatures..

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
  16. justdoit April 23, 2016 at 12:13 pm

    WE the People! We have the power to stop this nonsense if we only unite and stop supporting any and all who oppose decency and common sense.

    These multi-million players expect us to pay for their playground, which in it’s self is bordering ridiculous and now they want to pass their moral judgement onto us.

    Big business has gone ballistic interferring with our lives. Control is a big issue.

    We need to wake up, unite together and take our Country back to the people! Amen.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 11:28 pm

      Looking, as I said before, it IS about more than what bathroom somebody uses. It’s about CONTROL and forcing the REST of us accept and approve WHATEVER the FASCIST loony left decides is NORMAL. THAT is why NO attempt at “compromise” will satisfy them. They’re always talking about being “tolerant” and what a great thing it is to compromise, but that is only when they’re trying to force somebody ELSE to agree with what they want. They are the LEAST tolerant and uncompromising people on the planet. Well, except maybe for ISIS.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 24, 2016 at 3:47 pm

      Teabag, that’s why i posted the dictionary definition OF bigotry, since it often gets used BY the left to us, when it applies to THEM more so..

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
  17. LookingfortheEXIT April 23, 2016 at 12:18 pm

    Separate mini restrooms each with a toilet, urinal and sink… And a lock on the door. Separate fitting rooms with locks on the doors. Walls between all of them. Renovation or building might be more expensive but those who would support the establishments that did so would be legion…and profitable.

    Don’t argue with them…head them off at the pass.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.0/5 (3 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 1:26 pm

      Looking, that would solve the problem, but it would NOT force the majority to accept and APPROVE the transgenders’ choice, so I’m sure they would not find it acceptable. This is all about CONTROL, after all. The “bathroom” issue is just the cudgel they are using to beat everybody into submission to the loony left.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.3/5 (3 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 3:00 pm

      And why should WE the majority (straight sane people) have to pay out FOR those changes to be done??

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.2/5 (5 votes cast)
    • LookingfortheEXIT April 23, 2016 at 7:16 pm

      I would rather pay a few extra cents on each dollar – as we know it all trickles down to us – and solve the problem then to continue to give the issue/issuers the attention. Nothing to see here, it would say. Move on. I would rather be putting our collextive energy into things that matter. If they can’t accept the solution, it is obviously something more than not wanting to go into a “certain” shared bathroom.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.0/5 (3 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 24, 2016 at 3:49 pm

      Paying extra to ‘cater’ to these people, is just as bad as giving into them. Either way they are winning.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.5/5 (2 votes cast)
  18. disqus_uhrCgpux4b April 23, 2016 at 12:22 pm

    Well the next time I’m out, I drink too much beer and the line at the women’s room is long, I’m puuting my hair in a pony tail, deepening my voice and going to the men’s room.

    For that moment I’m going to identify as a man, so there.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.7/5 (3 votes cast)
  19. Cheryl Herritt April 23, 2016 at 1:00 pm

    I would never use those restrooms not allow my kids to use them. I would never go to a place or event where I could not use the restrooms. I just prefer not to ogled by men or have my kids endangered because they have to pee. If enough people boycott these places and events they’ll change their policies. Money speaks volumes.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • disqus_DW3qxKdlwn April 23, 2016 at 1:12 pm

      Cheryl: I would not want to be assaulted by other men in the restroom and I would not want my kid relatives to be assaulted by anyone (regardless of their gender) in a public restroom. I can also choose to not spend my money in NC for any reason including the reason that NC chose to keep a bigoted law on the book. If you don’t like it, it’s too bad.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 1.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  20. wga8888 April 23, 2016 at 1:06 pm

    This is simple. Add an addendum to the law: The politicians and their attorneys assume criminal and civil liable for anyone assaulted in a bathroom by someone claiming to be transgender.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 1:28 pm

      That’s a HOOT, wga8888. When have you ever known a politician to “accept responsibility” for ANYTHING they have done?

      You can bet MONEY that Congress will EXEMPT themselves from these laws, just as they are EXEMPT from all the Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity hiring laws and such. Congress is the ONLY place in America that still can and DOES issue “work orders” to hire a white male of a specific age range and OTHER discriminatory language.

      I’m not saying we should return to that–just saying they NEVER complied with any of those laws, because they automatically exempt themselves from EVERYTHING they inflict on the REST OF US, including, most famously, OBAMACARE.

      So it’s very much “OK for thee, but NOT for me!”

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 23, 2016 at 3:04 pm

      A better law, would be to require THEIR own private restrooms get opened up to public use and anyone of any sex can go in and use them anytime they want, and the politicians can’t do a damn thing about it.

      BUT as Teabag says, these ‘elite nutjobs’ never seem to abide by the same laws they make us abide by..

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.2/5 (5 votes cast)
    • oleteabag April 23, 2016 at 11:35 pm

      ituser, I daresay if the “elite nutjobs” were subject to the same laws as they write for the REST of us, they’d be writing VERY different laws!

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 24, 2016 at 3:51 pm

      Agreed. Just like if they had to suffer the same consequences of these laws as us (such as THEIR loved ones were in those target rich ‘gun free zones’ when a nutjob goes a shootin) they would soon realize how stupid those laws are..

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
    • sotheseedsofliberty2 April 24, 2016 at 9:20 pm

      wga8888 April 23, 2016 at 1:06 pm

      wga8888 posted,”This is simple. Add an addendum to the law: The politicians and their attorneys assume criminal and civil liable for anyone assaulted in a bathroom by someone claiming to be transgender.” Good idea,I’m waiting to see how many politicians would agree.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 25, 2016 at 4:43 pm

      None of course. Since most of the dunces pushing this are liberal governors and politicians, they Never accept responsibility for what befalls US cause of Their dumb ideas.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 3.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  21. nax777 April 23, 2016 at 3:09 pm

    Amazing that Libs see these extremes as acceptable collateral damage for progessive liberity.
    But if one progressive person is “offended” by any act of another person/s.
    Well, that person/s need to be condemned, condensed, sued, jailed, fired, forced, hated, deported, expelled, strictly humiliated, denounced, black balled, insulted, demeaning, destroyed, subjected, injected, instastutionalized, beaten, striped, searched and anything else that will brake individual interference to progressive control.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser April 24, 2016 at 3:54 pm

      Which is why i keep comparing liberals to the borg every day.. Cause they resemble the Borg’s You will be assimilated, resistance is futile way of doing things.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  22. meredit April 23, 2016 at 3:42 pm

    I’m headed out to Target in awhile and am going to inquire about the new policy. That particular Target is set among a number of churches and a seminary although clientele are very diverse. It will be interesting to hear if they’re going to enforce the rule or not. If after they verify that it will be enforced I’ll warn them that the second I see a dude ogling me or any other female they’ll get a face-full of pepper spray and loud screaming. Let’s see what they say.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.7/5 (3 votes cast)
    • yessir April 23, 2016 at 4:02 pm

      Well, wouldn’t you respond that way if you were just shopping anywhere in the store and someone began harassing or assaulting you? Do you have concealed carry where you are?

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 4.5/5 (2 votes cast)
    • meredit May 22, 2016 at 2:36 pm

      Yes, I would. An online source states that small canisters are legal and may be used if one feels his/her safety is threatened. I’m just concerned that, like shooting an intruder at your home, protecting the perpetrator’s “rights” would involve charges of assault for a victim, defending one’s right, and eventual (hopefully) dismissal of charges. I’d want to hurt someone if that happened. This isn’t as crazy as it sounds. An officer once told me that if you shoot an intruder, you’d better make sure he/she is entirely inside your home when police arrive, even if you have to drag them in (his suggestion) or you’ll be charged in the shooting and taken in. I guess we’ll have to have our phones out, ready to tape someone under, over, or at the cracks in stalls. Insane.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  23. Pamela Sue Therrien April 23, 2016 at 4:21 pm

    Well, now this to me is a war on women because putting women, girls, and children of female gender at risk for the benefit of so few is insane. As for me I have uncomfortable even thinking about the possibility of having to use a restroom out in public. Trader Joe’s has two restroom’s slow going, but safe thank God, one per per. I would walk out other wise in one breath. Not good. I have a right to a safe and decent space to go to the bathroom.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.8/5 (5 votes cast)
  24. Pamela Sue Therrien April 23, 2016 at 5:16 pm

    and that is why there is never a resolution… understanding and compassion is a two way road not a one way street. Liberals are so mean and nasty and it seems so odd those screaming the loudest and the most nasty, vicious people are using words like fairness, safe zones, kindness and such but only if it is my way or else..

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
  25. gimmesometruth April 23, 2016 at 5:28 pm

    Entrance to a public restroom must be based on what’s between your legs, not what’s between your ears. Trump is totally wrong. If this group insists on access to restrooms based on their mistaken identity, then a 3rd category needs to be employed with ‘Women and Men’. I would call it ‘CONFUSED’.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • BlackRaven May 13, 2016 at 1:56 pm

      Today on Outnumbered Melissa Francis (FoxBN) gushed
      “What’t the big deal? There ARE private stalls”
      So according to her take on it I guess that would be okay for men and women to share same?
      I mean if there were private stalls../S

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Write a Reply or Comment