A pair of tech companies filed a lawsuit Thursday to block a Florida law that would implement penalties for “Big Tech censorship” of citizens and political candidates.

NetChoice and the Computer and Communications Industry Association announced the lawsuit, saying the bill, which would allow fines, lawsuits and other penalties against tech companies that remove Floridians from their platforms, infringes on free speech and driven by politically motivated opposition to companies’ moderation decisions.

“By tying the hands of digital services fighting online harms, this law would turn American companies into unwilling tools for bad actors at home and abroad, putting Floridians at risk,” CCIA President Matt Schruers said.

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed the law Monday which would allow “all Floridians treated unfairly by Big Tech platforms” to sue the companies for monetary damages up to $100,000 and institute fines of $250,000 per day on social media companies that remove candidates for statewide office from their platforms and $25,000 per day for those running for non-statewide offices.

It would also allow the state’s attorney general to bring action to restrict tech companies that violate the law from contracting with any public entity under Florida’s Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

The lawsuit states that the law infringes on the First Amendment rights of tech companies by forcing them to host content they find objectionable and provides special treatment to political candidates.

Additionally, they note that the Walt Disney Company and Comcast, which own theme parks in Florida, are “arbitrarily” exempt under the law.

“The law is crony capitalism masquerading as consumer protection. Our lawsuit will stop an attempt by the state of Florida to undermine the First Amendment and force social media sites to carry offensive and harmful political messages,” said Carl Szabo, NetChoice vice president and general counsel.

DeSantis representative Christina Pushaw said the governor believes the law has a “strong legal basis” in a statement to The Hill.

“It is recognized that the government has a role in protecting consumers against discrimination and deceptive/unfair trade practices and this law is within that authority to rein in a powerful entity that oversteps individuals’ free speech rights,” Pushaw said.

Copyright 2021 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI’s prior written consent.


This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.

Rating: 2.5/5. From 12 votes.
Please wait...