SANIBEL ISLAND, Fla. (AP) — When Hurricane Ian struck Florida’s Gulf Coast, it washed out the bottom level of David Muench’s home on the barrier island of Sanibel along with several cars, a Harley-Davidson and a boat.
His parents’ house was among those destroyed by the storm that killed at least two people there, and the lone bridge to the crescent-shaped island collapsed, cutting off access by car to the mainland for its 6,300 residents.
Hurricane Ian underscores the vulnerability of the nation’s barrier islands and the increasing costs of people living on the thin strips of land that parallel the coast. As hurricanes become more destructive, experts question whether such exposed communities can keep rebuilding in the face of climate change.
“This is a Hurricane Katrina-scale event, where you’re having to rebuild everything, including the infrastructure,” said Jesse M. Keenan, a real estate professor at Tulane University’s School of Architecture. “We can’t build back everything to what it was — we can’t afford that.”
Ian slammed into southwest Florida as a Category 4 hurricane Wednesday with among the highest windspeeds in U.S. history — in nearly the same spot where Hurricane Charley, also a Category 4, caused major damage in 2004.
Of the 50 tropical cyclones that have come within 100 nautical miles of the Fort Myers area since 1873, 23 have been hurricanes that passed within 75 miles (120 kilometers) of Sanibel Island, according to the city’s website. Each posed “a significant threat to property and lives on the island at some point in its life cycle.”
In 1921, a massive hurricane wiped out half of neighboring Captiva’s landmass and cut that island in two, according to the Sanibel Historical Museum & Village.
The latest storm has initiated a new cycle of damage and repair on Sanibel that’s played out on many other barrier islands, from the New Jersey shore and North Carolina’s Outer Banks to a ribbon of land along the Louisiana coast.
Barrier islands were never an ideal place for development, experts say. They typically form as waves deposit sediment off the mainland. And they move based on weather patterns and other ocean forces. Some even disappear.
Building on the islands and holding them in place with beach replenishment programs just makes them more vulnerable to destruction because they can no longer move, according to experts.
“They move at the whims of the storms,” said Anna Linhoss, a professor of biosystems engineering at Auburn University. “And if you build on them, you’re just waiting for a storm to take them away.”
After devastating parts Florida, Ian made landfall again in South Carolina, where Pawleys Island was among the hardest hit places. Friday’s winds and rains broke apart the barrier island’s main pier, one of several in the state to crumble and wash away.
On Saturday, homeowners in the beach community about 73 miles (120 kilometers) up the coast from Charleston struggled to assess damage from storm. The causeways connecting the island to the mainland were strewn with palm fronds, pine needles and even a kayak retrieved from a nearby shoreline.
Like Pawleys Island, many barrier island communities anchor long-entrenched tourist economies, which are often the source of crucial tax dollars. At the same time, the cost of rebuilding them is often high because they’re home to many expensive properties, such as vacation homes.
“When there’s a disaster like this, we will pour tens of billions of public dollars into these communities to help them rebuild,” said Robert S. Young, director of the Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines, which is a joint venture between Duke University and Western Carolina University.
“And we will ask very little for that money in return in terms of taking a step back from places that are incredibly exposed to hazards and making sure that we never have this kind of a disaster again,” Young said.
But any big changes to the standard disaster response will be complicated, said Dawn Shirreffs, Florida director of the Environmental Defense Fund.
Challenges could include decisions on who participates in programs that elevate flood-prone homes or programs that buy those homes and tear them down. Planting mangroves to prevent erosion could end up blocking someone’s view.
Many homeowners bought their properties before people were fully aware of climate change and the risks of sea-level rise, Shirreffs said.
Keenan, the Tulane professor, said Sanibel will undoubtedly be changed by Hurricane Ian, based on the research he’s done. There will be fewer government resources to help people rebuild. Those with fewer means and who are underinsured will likely move. People with financial means will stay.
“Sanibel will just be an enclave for the ultrawealthy,” Keenan said.
But Muench, the Sanibel resident, said homeowners and business owners are sure to rebuild their properties.
His family has owned and operated a campground on the island for three generations. The island, he said, is “paradise — we live in the most beautiful place on Earth.”
“We are going to continue to exist on Sanibel,” Muench, 52, said from Fort Myers on Friday after evacuating Sanibel. “Give us five years, and you might not even notice if you didn’t know.”
___
Finley reported from Norfolk, Virginia. Associated Press reporters Curt Anderson in St. Petersburg, Florida, and Meg Kinnard in Pawleys Island, South Carolina, contributed to this story.
© 2022 The Canadian Press. All rights reserved.
—-
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.
People in the article keep referring to climate change as if these ‘islands’ had never been affected before the term came into use. These land masses come and go as they always have subject to the wind and the the movement of the ocean which is never still. We’ve never had so much destruction because early settlers and later residents knew these were not stable places to build on. Those not brought up near the seashore thought how pretty the place was and speculators took advantage of them. Building temporary homes for vacationing may be finem permanebt residences are another thing.
Hence why i think none of those barrier islands SHOULD BE ‘build on’, as they inevitably remove all WHAT MADE it a “Barrier”, to put in the buildings, foundations, plumbing/internet/phone lines etc.. JUST LEAVE THEM AS BARRIERS.
you live on the east coast and on the beach you are playing russian roulette.
AND if you willingly REBUILD IN AN AREA after having your home destroyed by nature, AND REFUSE To have your own insurance, IMO YOU should be on your OWN the 2nd time it happens.
The Govt should ONLY PAY to rebuild once… AFTER THAT you should be azzed out.
The beauty of the landscape and the reality of Nature coexist side by side.
The US has spent countless money rebuilding for people who quite frankly didn’t have enough sense to build in a safer place. It used to be rebuilding for those that built too close to the Mississippi River and every spring, just like clockwork, we were treated to the pictures of all the houses washed away during the spring runoff. Now it’s barrier islands.
I understand that they are beautiful places but it is not my responsibility to help you rebuild a house that was doomed from day 1. Why can’t we enjoy these islands on a tourist basis instead of a residence basis? We wouldn’t need to build billion dollar roads to access them if they were day use or tent camping only. Come by boat, go home to solid ground at the end of your visit. The government gurus in charge of allowing building of homes on these islands need to be jailed, IMO.
It’s bad enough to have to rebuild the mainland along the southern coast from flood damage every year without rebuilding islands.
Exactly. I know folks who think me HEARTLESS, by saying if you BUILD in a known disaster zone, and do not have insurance (because you refused to get it), then you should be SOL in getting govt funds to rebuild there. ESPECIALLY IF YOU’VE already RECEIVED govt funds to rebuild once before..
Do it a 2nd time, and you iMo should be on your bloody own.