Sometimes, the stars align, and things happen the way they’re supposed to. Like starting Women’s History Month with a wonderful gift to women, or at least the unborn kind.
On the eve of the 31-day period that celebrates the beauty, the intelligence, the talent, the majesty and all of the other traits shared by the sisterhood, the Senate by a 48-46 margin rejected attempts to codify Roe v. Wade and provide women with a federal right to abortion.
The coyly named “Women’s Health Protection Act” would, if passed, have invalidated each and every state law that provided limitations on a mother’s right to terminate her pregnancy. It was a knee- jerk reaction to the prospect that Roe would be overruled at the Supreme Court, thereby allowing the 50 states to construct for themselves their own abortion landscapes.
And that scared the sort of person who thinks women’s history includes an actual “right” to abortion in the Constitution, and that women’s autonomy requires an actual “right” to become unpregnant, and that women’s dignity requires an actual “right” to ignore the dignity of nascent human life.
To be fair, women who think that the power to give life is much less empowering than the power to end it actually do have a legitimate reason to be nervous. While it’s far from certain that this court will overturn Roe, particularly with question marks like Roberts and Kavanaugh sitting somewhere in the middle of the bench, many pro-lifers are cautiously optimistic that Roe will finally be erased from the jurisprudential horizon.
But our cautious optimism translates to apoplexy for the other side, and they started to promote laws which, to be honest, would have been struck down the minute someone challenged them in a court of law. There were no exceptions for religious opposition. The legislation provided for abortion up to the moment of birth, which is something that even under Roe could have been prohibited under the right circumstances. The principle of states rights was completely ignored.
Every single Republican voted to oppose the Women’s Health Protection Act. Even Senators Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, noted supporters of abortion rights, refused to jump on the “Federalize Abortion” bandwagon and countered with their own more moderate bill.
“I have long supported a woman’s right to choose, but my position is not without limits, and this partisan Women’s Health Protection Act simply goes too far,” Murkowski said in a statement. “It would broadly supersede state laws and infringe on Americans’ religious freedoms.”
Any celebration of women must include a celebration of their ability to give life, to nurture it, to shelter and mentor it, to teach it lessons in virtue and compassion, to protect it, to perpetuate it. And far too many women – and men – forget that. Worse still, they look on this ability as a hindrance to greater things, like a corner office.
You don’t have to agree with me about abortion. Most, I think, don’t. As the polls show, most think that women should have some ability to empty their wombs of unwanted cargo. And I am resigned to the fact that this will always be the case.
But legislation that ignores a Catholic doctor’s right to refrain from taking life, and that looks upon the states as neutered servants of some federal overlord, is repellent. Beyond that, it’s dangerous. And I’m very thankful 48 principled senators knew it.
A friend once told me that the key is in changing hearts and minds. We need, he said, to help women understand that abortion solves no problems, and creates a world of hurt. He said that legislation was ultimately ineffective.
I responded that I really have no interest in changing the hearts and minds of people who believe that destroying unborn life is a right. And that’s why working the courts, and the legislatures, is key to making next year’s Women’s History Month, the one where we can finally celebrate the glory of unborn women, a reality.
–
Copyright 2022 Christine Flowers, distributed exclusively by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.
Christine Flowers is an attorney and a columnist for the Delaware County Daily Times, and can be reached at [email protected].
The Democrat sponsored “Women’s Health Protection Act” offered, certainly does not protect their mental health, nor spiritual health, but liberal men have reputations for concentrating only on a woman’s healthy body, and using whatever in drugs and alcohol to adjust their mental states into diminutive states of social submission, so they can use their bodies, which is just what this bill offers the female portion of WE THE PEOPLE.
AND ITS hard, if not impossible, to change the “HEARTS AND MINDS” Of these infanticide lovers.. AS THEY HAVE NO HEARTS< and their minds have been rotted out from libtardism!
AMEN!!!
“Women’s Health Protection Act” equals the death of the innocent.
No greater love hath a man than he lay down his life for a friend. ,,,No greater love hath a woman, than she lay down her child for herself, her hourglass figure, her bank account, her jeopardized secular university education ,and soon to be ex-boyfriend.
Another reason not to hire one to run your military, or go to Poland to represent your country in war, thinking Polish is something what you use to shine your shoes.
YET again proving the age old addage, What ever name, the dems come up with for one of their bills, YOU CAN TAKE IT TO THE BANK, that the GOAL OF that bill is the exact OPPOSITE