A Wyoming legislative panel on Thursday voted to draft two bills that would introduce ranked-choice voting to Wyoming’s elections.
One would make Wyoming primaries ranked-choice, while the second would allow municipal elections to adopt the system on a trial basis.
The move comes amid a broader conversation about changes to Wyoming’s voting system. In the recent past, lawmakers have weighed whether to enact a primary run-off system, end crossover voting or institute a jungle primary, where all candidates regardless of party run in the same contest. Many of those proposed changes stem from the fact that one party — the Republicans — dominate Wyoming politics.
What would a ranked-choice system do? Generally speaking, it would have voters rank some or all candidates on the ballot. Each candidate gets one vote every time someone puts them down as their top choice.
If no candidate receives more than 50% of the vote, things get a little more complex.
The candidate who receives the least votes is eliminated from the race. As for voters that had that last-place candidate ranked first? Their votes now go to their second-choice candidate.
This carries on until one candidate has a majority vote.
Proponents of the model say that, because it gathers more information about how voters feel about each candidate, the system is more fair.
Both of the bills discussed Thursday by the Legislature’s Joint Corporations Committee would be modeled off of ranked-choice systems adopted by other states, lawmakers said.
One is Alaska’s new primary process, which made its debut Aug. 16.
Voters rank their top four choices, and the four candidates with the most votes proceed to the general election. The primaries are also nonpartisan; voters could choose to put a Republican first and a Democrat second on their ballots, for instance, regardless of who they’re registered to vote with.
The system does take longer to carry out: Alaska’s primary results won’t be finalized until the end of the month.
The other bill would allow Wyoming cities to opt into an experimental ranked-choice voting program for municipal elections, which are usually nonpartisan anyway. Utah launched such a program in 2019.
Ranked-choice voting would cost about $864,000 up front to implement in Wyoming, plus an additional $10,000 per county per election year, said Kai Schon, elections director for the Secretary of State’s Office, said at the meeting. That’s because the state would need to buy voting technology that’s federally certified to do it.
By comparison, implementing a runoff system could cost up to about $1 million per election year, Schon said.
© Copyright (c) 2022 Casper Star-Tribune
—-
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.
Ranked choice voting and “jungle” primaries are just more Lib scams, designed to muddy the waters for elections. Once again, the Libs want to put a thumb on the scale to change the votes to their liking. Note that they mentioned in the article how one party, the Republicans, dominate Wyoming politics. That’s not because of “unfair” elections – when you have a state known for cowboys and miners, not much chance of people voting for Big City Libs.
THat is why i oppose ALL attempts to force ‘Ranked voting” on anyone.. AND ITS strange here, that its the so-called Republicans trying to do it here in Wyoming..
BUT as for the “it will end crossover voting”. I HAVE OFTEN ASKED why that is even allowed, legally. AS SO FAR i have only ever seen it done BY DEMOCRAT VOTERS, coming over to the republican party, TO VOTE FOR THE MOST RINO of the bunch, then they go RIGHT BACK TO being a democrat voter afterwards…
Sounds like a great new way for Democrats who cannot honestly win, steal the election by any and other means. Taking months to determine the outcome is just an invitation to get your elections stolen by the criminal party of social thieves and redistributors of honest outcomes. If you cannot come up with a winner in 24 hours, then the mischief begins.
ANd if you note, the states ‘ranked voting’ already exists in, such as NY, mass, Ca, Colorado etc. THE DEMS HAVE LONG HELD POWER…
More Stupidity! No other word for it unless you add some colorful language.