Reports of the pro-life movement’s death have been greatly exaggerated.
Vice President J.D. Vance spoke in person at the March for Life last week, becoming only the second sitting vice president to do so.
President Donald Trump recorded a video for the occasion, in which he vowed to “stop the radical Democrat push for a federal right to unlimited abortion on demand, up to the moment of birth and even after birth.”
He also pardoned 23 protesters convicted of violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act during Joe Biden’s presidency — including Paula Harlow, a 75-year-old woman sentenced to two years in federal prison for blocking access to an abortion clinic.
Were these words and actions signs of a party wavering in its pro-life commitments?
In the lead-up to last year’s election, publications not generally known for anti-abortion sympathies devoted column inches to writers castigating Trump for supposedly betraying pro-life voters.
Peter Wehner, a long-ago George W. Bush speechwriter, took to the pages of The Atlantic with an essay attempting to poison social conservatives against the 2024 Republican nominee:
“The pro-life justification for supporting the former president has now collapsed,” readers were told — but The Atlantic isn’t exactly considered a trusted source by the evangelical voters Wehner hoped to turn.
Far from being shut out of Republican politics by Trump, pro-lifers seem to be honored more than ever, and they’re well aware there’s no place for them in today’s Democratic Party.
Efforts to drive a wedge between Trump and this steadfast conservative constituency are usually in bad faith, but liberal outlets opposed to the president and pro-lifers alike will keep trying to provoke conflict between them.
What’s remarkable, however, is not only how well the alliance between abortion foes and Trump has held up but how abortion has begun to recede from national politics.
Democrats counted on a backlash against overturning Roe v. Wade to propel Kamala Harris into the White House.
This was the first presidential election since the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision that ended Roe and returned abortion law to the states.
If ever there was going to be a nationwide referendum on Roe, and abortion as a federally protected right, this was it.
Yet Trump won that referendum for pro-lifers.
Harris actually lost ground with women voters compared to Biden’s performance four years earlier.
State-level referendums turned out worse for pro-lifers — they lost in seven of the 10 states that put abortion on the ballot last year.
In all 10 of those states, Harris underperformed relative to the vote in support of abortion rights.
According to Sarah Varney of KFF Health News, “about 3 in 10 voters in Arizona, Missouri, and Nevada who supported the abortion rights measures also voted for Trump,” and the pattern was similar in the other states with abortion on the ballot.
The Trump-Vance ticket won the middle ground by standing against Roe and in favor of leaving abortion to the states.
That doesn’t satisfy the most ardent pro-lifers, who would prefer a national abortion ban.
But given a choice between fighting their battles at the state level or seeing Roe reimposed nationally, even the most uncompromising abortion opponent will opt for some success in the states over total defeat at the federal level.
The Trump-Vance approach has given pro-lifers victories that would have been impossible if abortion had remained a national issue.
Nebraska wouldn’t have been able to pass an amendment to the state constitution prohibiting abortion after the first trimester, and Florida voters wouldn’t have been able to uphold their state’s ban on the procedure after six weeks — to name just two recent successes.
The most hardline supporters of abortion, meanwhile, have been thwarted: Not only did they lose the showdown over Roe, they risk losing all their political momentum as Americans become more used to settling this most contentious of issues at the state level.
In the states, neighbors can search for consensus with neighbors, instead of strangers across the country arguing with each other over ideological principles.
Such is the variety of culture and values from state to state that no American, whatever his or her views on abortion, need feel as if there’s no place in this country to live among those who share the same fundamental commitments and under laws that respect their conscience.
There won’t be an end to debate, of course, either within the states or at the national level.
But as long as federal power isn’t in play, even arguments over abortion can become less acrimonious.
That, too, may serve the pro-life cause well, easing the way to winning hearts and changing minds — and saving lives.
Daniel McCarthy is the editor of Modern Age: A Conservative Review. To read more by Daniel McCarthy, visit www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM
The days of the bitter, angry FemiNazi are over. It’s morning in America again.
There’s a new generation of young women coming up who respect God, Life and Country !
Exactly what fundamental right or human right gives a woman the right to murder her unborn baby?
What about the Baby’s fundamental rights or human rights?
A woman’s body ends at the end of the baby’s umbilical cord and that is where the baby’s body begins.
It is not the woman’s body that they are killing; it is the baby’s body!!
I hope it spells the death knell for feminazis…
“Millions for defense ( of Innocent American life), not a penny for Tribute” (To the dealers of death of American innocent life in the womb in American deathcare now disguised as Family planned Healthcare),,,where a woman gets to unaccountably control what goes into her body in uncontrollable pursuits of pleasure, while the American taxpayer gets the pain of paying for the costly bad medical results of her selfish pleasure pursuits. Just another Woke planned measure of killing our collective American government’s ability to provide and promote SELF-Government by killing the requirement to self-govern each individual person’s bad behavior and bad judgements that result in collective death of innocent babies. Sane sober American taxpayers should not be responsible for paying for drunk drugged women’s pleasurable or unpleasurable sexual indiscretions that divide us by gender and rip out major threads from the formerly whole cloth of American morality.