How is it possible that Hillary Clinton escaped criminal indictment for mishandling classified documents despite incriminating evidence that she violated the Espionage Act?
Why did Donald Trump become the target of a criminal investigation for allegedly conspiring with Russia to influence the presidential election despite no evidence that he ever did so?
The answer, it seems, comes down to one person who played a vital role in both cases: Peter Strzok, deputy director of counterintelligence at the FBI.
Strzok was exchanging politically charged texts with an FBI lawyer that denigrated Trump and lauded Clinton at the same time he was leading the bureau’s criminal investigation of Clinton. He is also the one who changed the critical wording of then-FBI Director James Comey’s description of Clinton’s handling of classified material that resulted in no charges being brought against her.
Read more at Fox News
Recent Comments
Comment by drcbjmd
Posted in Boys’ and girls’ toy, clothes sections could land CA stores $1K fine Mar 3, 00:56
Comment by History1
Posted in Boys’ and girls’ toy, clothes sections could land CA stores $1K fine Mar 2, 22:12
Comment by minaka
Posted in The Case Against Reparations Mar 2, 20:47
Comment by robertmchl
Posted in The Case Against Reparations Mar 2, 20:20
Comment by disqus_3cDicYnCy2
Posted in Elizabeth Warren says ‘it’s time’ for a wealth tax hike on ‘ultra-millionaires’ Mar 2, 18:18