Amazon is launching a racial equity audit to examine any uneven effects of its policies, programs and practices on hourly employees.
Facing pressure from shareholders to provide more information about pay gaps, working conditions and procedures that may be negatively affecting women, people of color and other minorities, Amazon announced in a recent legal filing it had hired former U.S. Attorney General Loretta Lynch to conduct an audit to “evaluate any disparate racial impacts on our nearly one million U.S. hourly employees resulting from our policies, programs and practices.”
The audit is part of its “existing commitment to human and civil rights, racial equity, diversity and inclusion and nondiscrimination,” the filing read.
Amazon said it would publicly release the results of the audit but declined to share when it would be completed or specifics about what the audit would study.
The audit will include only hourly employees and will not include workers at Whole Foods or PillPack, Amazon’s pharmaceutical centers where workers pack and ship prescriptions.
Attorneys at Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, a law firm based in New York City, will conduct the audit, and Lynch will lead it. The firm also recently represented Amazon in an antitrust lawsuit filed by Washington, D.C., Attorney General Karl Racine challenging Amazon’s pricing policies. In March, a D.C. Superior Court judge dismissed the case.
Amazon tucked the announcement of the racial equity audit into an annual filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, ahead of its quarterly earnings call with investors next week and its meeting with shareholders in May.
A shareholder proposal requesting a similar audit failed to pass at Amazon’s last annual meeting, but 44% of stakeholders voted in favor of it. This year, shareholders again introduced a proposal for a diversity and equity audit, asking for a report that would analyze the effects of its policies, practices, products and services “through a racial equity lens.” It asks for an assessment of Amazon’s diversity, equity and inclusion strategy and its effectiveness as well as how the company is addressing any implicit biases.
“Because of the pattern and magnitude of controversies repeatedly facing Amazon, we believe that it is in shareholders’ best interests for Amazon to proactively identify and mitigate risks through an independent racial equity audit,” the proposal reads.
Ahead of Amazon’s annual meeting, shareholders also introduced several other proposals to study how the company’s policies and products could be contributing to racial and gender divides, including:
* Whether Amazon’s health and safety practices give rise to any racial and gender disparities in workplace injury rates, affecting long-term earnings and career advancement for women and minority warehouse workers
* More information on gender and racial pay gaps to address “structural bias” that women and minorities face regarding job opportunity and pay
* A public report on the risk to Amazon of using contract clauses, like nondisclosure agreements, related to harassment and discrimination
* And an independent study of Rekognition, a facial recognition system that Amazon Web Services markets and sells to government and shareholders say is “worse at identifying Black women than white men and misgenders nonbinary people.”
Amazon’s board of directors is recommending shareholders vote against all those proposals, as well as one that asks more broadly for a study on working conditions in its warehouses.
The board pointed to a report it released earlier this year that found the rate of injury at its facilities has declined and noted its investment in new technologies, research and procedures to protect warehouse employees.
When it comes to its facial recognition product offering, the board said Amazon is “committed to the responsible use of artificial intelligence and machine learning,” and had never received a report of the technology being misused “in the manner posited in this proposal.” Related to pay gaps and racial and gender disparities, the board said it regularly reviews employee well-being and workplace safety, and that Amazon is “committed to supporting and increasing diversity.”
Amazon’s board of directors is comprised of six men and five women, according to the SEC filing. Of 11 total members, it includes nine white people, one Black person and one Asian person.
It employs 1.6 million people worldwide.
___
(c)2022 The Seattle Times
Visit The Seattle Times at www.seattletimes.com
Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.
—-
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.
Hope everybody pleads the fifth.
IF ‘gender’ is a social construct THEN THERE shouldn’t bloody well be such a thing, as a gender pay gap.
another one who should be in jail.
“equity” is just the Democrat Part’s new con and deception.
Equity is just another way of saying socialism. (everybody will be equal in everything in their life)
No gender, everybody is neutral, no individuality, everybody will be a robot, no ambition to secede, secede to what?
Ones ability or training is irrelevant, it is irrelevant if you are a uneducated street sweeper or a neurosurgeon you receive the same income.
The objective is for EVERYONE to be a servant, slave, ward or minion to the “Socialist Democrat Party Dictatorship”.
AND You can bet, their version of equity HAS several dozen layers of ‘equalness’ WITH WHITE MALE conservatives not ever qualifying.
Give it 20 or 30 years, and there won’t be enough skilled technicians available to keep the lights on, clean water flowing from the tap, or to keep all the surveillance technology functioning…. but there will be more than enough people running around bleating on about “equity” and “systemic racism”.
I’ll give the results of this “audit” to everyone right now: “Straight White Men Are To Blame”.
z-man37:
And according to the treasonous, socialist Democrat Party and their corrupt puppet F… joe Biden.
President Donald Trump is still the blame for everything From high energy costs to a cloudy day.
So you mean that white people get paid differently than black, Spanish, or Chinese people? Men make more than women? Gays make less than everyone else? Is this what I am hearing? Bogus BS to redistribute money and add to our failing economy. I do not believe this nor the fact you need such a malignant personality to propagate these lies.
The saddest is she is a racist.
Talk about “the blind leading the blind.”
More like the insane leading the mental.