There is no amount of hyperventilating, hyperbole and flat-out lying that can paper over the disastrous case that House Democrats have asked the Senate to try in their effort to impeach President Trump.
Rep. Adam Schiff, California Democrat and one of the chief architects of the fatally flawed case, did his best.
Standing in the well of the Senate, he condemned the Senate for not issuing subpoenas he and his House colleagues refused to issue. He lectured senators for not calling witnesses he himself had refused to call.
Then Mr. Schiff harangued the Senate for proceeding without regard for fairness and due process, the very same fairness and due process he himself had shredded in his Captain Ahab-like pursuit of Mr. Trump’s impeachment. Impeachment at any price!
Of course, Mr. Schiff did not even try to explain how he and his fellow House Democrats spent months racing for impeachment — only to stall and sit on the flimsy articles for 33 days before handing them over to the Senate for trial.
“Abuse of power.” And “obstruction of Congress.”
Those are not even crimes. Which we are reminded of every time House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says, “Nobody is above the law.”
OK, which law? Please cite the law, ma’am.
Mr. Schiff offered a new one in kicking off the Senate trial. A “trifecta of constitutional misconduct.”
He said Mr. Trump’s phone call with the president of Ukraine contained “the most serious charges ever leveled against a president.”
He said Mr. Trump has become a “monarch.” Something about invoking the very executive privilege that every president since George Washington has invoked.
The only silver lining for Mr. Schiff’s oily performance was the favorable angle of the C-SPAN camera capturing his big moment in the national spotlight. It was straightaway and high up in the balcony facing the Senate dais. Since Mr. Schiff was standing on the floor, the camera failed to pick up Mr. Schiff’s prominent, long and skinny neck. For the entirety of his harangue of hypocrisy, “Pencil Neck” concealed his pencil neck.
And the only times his eyes went full bug-out was when he would unfortunately strain his face upward, to look directly in the camera, as if speaking directly to the American people viewing from home. In those moments, he was bug-eyed but not pencil-necked.
So, a win for Mr. Schiff, in the appearance department. Unfortunately for him — and his wife — when he goes home, he will still be pencil-necked and bug-eyed.
Then Mr. Schiff complained that the “dry transcripts” — i.e. the actual words used to commit supposed “abuse of power” and “obstruction of Congress” — would not be sexy enough to win a conviction in the Senate.
This is always the problem with courtrooms and judges and justice. If the facts don’t prove your case, you lose. Totally fair technically, but often feels unfair when you lose.
Lucky for Adam Schiff he is incapable of embarrassment. Otherwise, he would have been utterly humiliated by the wire brush that White House counsel Pat Cipollone took to him afterward.
By the way, how funny is it that House Democrats are charging Mr. Trump with “obstruction of Congress?”
I mean, in these hyperpartisan times, it is near impossible for any president to nose above 48% approval. That seems pretty unpopular until you look at the approval numbers of Congress. It is worth remembering in these times that President Trump is still nearly twice as popular as Congress.
Even when the camera hides Mr. Schiff’s pencil neck.
🤔. So does this mean voters should never trust the vote anymore? They can only trust lawmakers to decide when a President crosses the line to get kicked out—& What qualifies to kick out that President? And only those lawmakers can do it? Not voters? Ever? https://t.co/V4tmgAdDXQ
— Bret Baier (@BretBaier) January 23, 2020
"So that we can fight Russia over there and we don’t have to fight Russia here." Adam Schiff
"The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back." Barack Obama pic.twitter.com/ViRWoKrIYp
— Tim Xeriland (@Xeriland) January 22, 2020
For all the talk about Russia undermining faith in US elections, how about Russiagaters like Schiff fear-mongering w/ hysterics like this?
Let's assume Ukraine did what Trump wanted: announce a probe of Burisma. Would that delegitimize a 2020 US election? This is a joke. https://t.co/jP1VjbBgQZ
— Aaron Maté (@aaronjmate) January 22, 2020
Liberals used to mock Bush supporters when they used this jingoistic line during the war on Iraq. Now they deploy it to justify an imperialist proxy war against a nuclear power. https://t.co/392MlEL2MM
— Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) January 22, 2020
Chris Wallace calls out Adam Schiff for blatantly lying on the Senate floor:
"He completely misrepresented what Mick Mulvaney said." pic.twitter.com/NX7bKQiE1L
— Chris Martin (@chrisjdmartin) January 22, 2020
⦁ Charles Hurt can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org and on Twitter on @charleshurt.
© Copyright (c) 2020 News World Communications, Inc.
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.