In his final state of the nation speech Monday, Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte defended his refusal to confront China over Beijing’s seizure and fortification of his country’s islets in the South China Sea.
“It will be a massacre if I go and fight a war now,” said Duterte. “We are not yet a competent and able enemy of the other side.”
Duterte is a realist. He will not challenge China to retrieve his lost territories, as his country would be crushed. But Duterte has a hole card: a U.S. guarantee to fight China, should he stumble into war with China.
Consider. Earlier this month, Secretary of State Antony Blinken assured Manila we would invoke the U.S.-Philippines mutual security pact in the event of Chinese military action against Philippine assets.
“We also reaffirm,” said Blinken, “that an armed attack on Philippine armed forces, public vessels or aircraft in the South China Sea would invoke U.S. mutual defense commitments under Article IV of the 1951 U.S.-Philippines Mutual Defense Treaty.”
Is this an American war guarantee to fight the People’s Republic of China, if the Philippines engage a Chinese warship over one of a disputed half-dozen rocks and reefs in the South China Sea? So it would appear.
Why are we threatening this?
Is who controls Mischief Reef or Scarborough Shoal a matter of such vital U.S. interest as to justify war between us and China?
Tuesday, in Singapore, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin reaffirmed the American commitment to go to war on behalf of the Philippines, should Manila attempt, militarily, to retrieve its stolen property.
Said Austin: “Beijing’s claim to the vast majority of the South China Sea has no basis in international law. … We remain committed to the treaty obligations that we have to Japan in the Senkaku Islands and to the Philippines in the South China Sea.”
Austin went on: “Beijing’s unwillingness to … respect the rule of law isn’t just occurring on the water. We have also seen aggression against India … destabilizing military activity and other forms of coercion against the people of Taiwan … and genocide and crimes against humanity against Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang.”
The Defense secretary is publicly accusing China of crimes against its Uyghur population in Xinjiang comparable to those for which the Nazis were hanged at Nuremberg.
Austin has also informed Beijing, yet again, that the U.S. is obligated by a 70-year-old treaty to go to war to defend Japan’s claims to the Senkakus, half a dozen rocks Tokyo now occupies and Beijing claims historically belong to China.
The secretary also introduced the matter of Taiwan, with which President Jimmy Carter broke relations and let lapse our mutual security treaty in 1979.
There remains, however, ambiguity on what the U.S. is prepared to do if China moves on Taiwan. Would we fight China for Taiwan’s independence, an island President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger said in 1972 was “part of China”?
And if China ignores our protests of its “genocide” and “crimes against humanity” against the Uyghurs, and of its human rights violations in Tibet, and of its crushing of democracy in Hong Kong, what are we prepared to do?
Sanctions? A decoupling of our economies? Confrontation? War?
This is not an argument for threatening war, but for an avoidance of war by providing greater clarity and certitude as to what the U.S. response will be if China ignores our protests and remains on its present course.
Some of us can still recall how President Dwight Eisenhower refused to intervene when Nikita Khrushchev ordered Russian tanks into Budapest to drown the 1956 Hungarian revolution in blood. Instead, we welcomed Hungarian refugees.
When the Berlin Wall went up in 1961, President John F. Kennedy called up the reserves and went to Berlin to make a famous speech, but did nothing.
“Less profile, more courage!” was the response of Cold War hawks.
But Kennedy was saying, as Eisenhower had said by his inaction in Hungary, that America does not go to war with a great nuclear power such as the Soviet Union over the right of East Germans to flee to West Berlin.
Which brings us back to Taiwan.
In the Shanghai Communique signed by Nixon, Taiwan was conceded to be a “part of China.” Are we now going to fight a war to prevent Beijing from bringing the island home to the “embrace of the motherland”?
And if we are prepared to fight, Beijing should not be left in the dark. China ought to know the risks it would be taking.
Cuba is an island, across the Florida Strait, with historic ties to the United States. Taiwan is an island 7,000 miles away, on the other side of the Pacific.
This month, Cubans rose up against the 62-year-old Communist regime fastened upon them by Fidel and Raul Castro.
By what yardstick would we threaten war for the independence of Taiwan but continue to tolerate 60 years of totalitarian repression in Cuba, 90 miles away?
Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of “Nixon’s White House Wars: The Battles That Made and Broke a President and Divided America Forever.” To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators website at www.creators.com.
—-
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.
Isn’t it amazing that a leader of a more powerful Country, like Nixon, can cede a free Country like Taiwan to communist China? What a disgrace! Just like Neville Chamberlain ceding part of Czechoslovakia to Germany. Many political leaders are garbage.
We could stop China economically in their tracks by just refusing to do business or accept ANY of their products into the United States. The following American economic recovery would blossom. But too many corrupt American businessmen and politicians have been bought and paid for by China like the Bidens and Duterte’s who as long as they get their own security and wealth, care not for those others who lose theirs,,,,so long as they get their 10% or the 30 pieces of silver used by the American Judas’s who betray AMerica with the socialist kiss.
Exactly. WE Have too many traitors LAPPING AT chinas bowl, to ever do anything to them.
AND IF ALL their attacks of our infrastructure, all their hacking of our intelligence, all their spying on us, WASN’T ITSELF proof something needs to be done, WHAT OF THEIR RELEASING COVID On the world?
AND IF THAT is still not ‘enough’ to go to war.. WHAT THE HELL IS?!
OR are our so-called leaders, TOO SCARED TO go to war with china over anything!??
I fully agree with you, backpacker. It made me mad then — the betrayal of Taiwan by Nixon— and it still makes angry today!
This is where hindsight is 20/20. It is with China as it is with North Korea. When we had the chance to render North Korea a non-threat, we pulled back. Look at them now.
The same is true in regards to China—there have been opportunities along the way to recognize their intent and get them in line. Again, now take a look.
A valuable lesson as to why we need a strong, capable, and respected military run by people who are true patriots and know how to command and lead—who have the insight to recognize threats and how to deal with them. This also goes for our President and Commander-In-Chief—it is not a position to be filled lightly. The present occupant at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue is a glaring example of what you do not want in that position. China owns him—we’re already jeopardized.
As the phrase goes. AN OUNCE Of prevention is worth a pound of cure..
HAD WE TAKEN CHINA OUT say in the 70s, after we CAUGHT THEM red handed, supplying troops and weapons to north vietnam, MAYBE WE COULD HAVE NIPPED Their global threat in the butt back then. BUT NOW DAYS< i just can't see ANY OF THE LYING sacks of putrid excrement in office, EVER DOING anything to 'irk off china'.. THEY ARE TOO bloody yellow.
Secretary of State, Anthney Blinken under democrat president, Joe Biden, goes to China With -‘ Hat-in-Hand, pleading P?ease don’t hurt the United States,Please!.
I agree with you, Son of thunder. We need to stop China now. We can do as Inluminatou states — i.e, ” stop China economically in their tracks by just refusing to do business or accept ANY of their products into the United States. The following American economic recovery would blossom.” And we can tell China as a last resort, invasion of Taiwan, Japan, or the Philippines, will require us to act decisively, a major confrontation with the US. We can not abandon our allies and loyal friends,