Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett and a federal judge in Missouri each rejected dual challenges to President Joe Biden’s student debt relief plan on Thursday.
The Brown County Taxpayers Association had filed an emergency relief request on Wednesday, arguing that Biden’s plan denies Congress its role of controlling federal spending while saddling the government with a bill of more than $1 trillion.
In August, Biden announced that the White House planned to forgive $10,000 in student loan debt for those making less than $125,000 annually and $20,000 for recipients of Pell grants, which assist students from lower-income families. The loan cancellations could begin as soon as Sunday.
The Brown County Taxpayers Association’s lawsuit previously failed at the district level where a federal judge dismissed it for lack of standing and an appeals court refused to overturn the lower court’s ruling before the emergency relief application was sent to Barrett, who oversees the 7th Circuit.
The association sought a restraining order and preliminary injunction to block Biden’s student debt relief plan from going into effect.
Barrett dismissed the application Thursday without comment, a signal that the taxpayers association lacked legal standing to challenge Biden’s student debt relief plan.
In a second case, U.S. District Court Judge Henry E. Autrey in St. Louis dismissed a lawsuit brought by six Republican states — Nebraska, Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas and South Carolina — that also sought declaratory and injunctive relief to block the program from taking effect.
The six states argued that Biden’s Education Department breached the separation of powers, violated the Administrative Procedure Act and overstepped the 2003 Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act — also known as the Heroes Act.
The HEROES Act allows the Education Secretary to “waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision applicable to the student financial assistance programs under title IV of the Act as the secretary deems necessary in connection with a war or other military operation or national emergency.”
Autrey noted in his decision Thursday that the HEROES Act was used to provide relief amid the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 to pause the accrual of interest and repayment for all federally held student loans — which was extended by Congress under the CARES Act.
When the CARES Act authorization expired, Education Secretary Miguel Cardona invoked the HEROES Act again to continue the pause on student loan repayments through December 21, 2022.
Autrey, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, said the stated had not suffered injuries that gave them the legal standing to sue the federal government.
“While plaintiffs present important and significant challenges to the debt relief plan, the current plaintiffs are unable to proceed to the resolution of these challenges,” Autrey wrote in his decision.
However, Judge William Griesbach, the U.S. District Court judge in Green Bay who previously dismissed the taxpayer association’s lawsuit, said in his decision that “those seeking to take advantage of the program” may want “to consider this possibility before placing undue reliance on the benefits promised.”
Copyright 2022 United Press International, Inc. (UPI). Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI’s prior written consent.
—-
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.
Biden’s plan denies Congress its role of controlling federal spending while saddling the government with a bill of more than $1 trillion. Thus adding to our country’s out of control inflation.
How do you feel about paying off someone else’s student loan?
Can I get Biden to pay off my house and my car??
Of course not, so why do I who didn’t get to go to college, pay for someone else’s college loan?
AND How in the heck, is this NOT making it to where a TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION< has legal standing???
BARRET once again, disappoints.
I have no problem helping educate smart people to serve in critical National defense jobs or do research to keep America ahead of the technology curve. Other than that the federal government has no business in socially redistributing honest money to dishonest political parties bent on using Patriot money for educating traitors to the concepts of workable American freedom. Paying to indoctrinate my own children in secular socialism to become socially dependent upon government to the point that the sacred concept of SELF-government is totally destroyed at a personal level, leading to total deatruction on a national level to the benefit of only one political party, is indeed a social crime against American humanity. Let merit and talent, not corrupt politicians, determine the educational winners and losers or we all will soon lose this country to the political criminals now in power.
If you are a US citizen and pay taxes you do have skin in the game to stop this bull to cancel out Congress law passing abilities.
Oh, that’s right. Amy Barrett has kids going to college during the next few years.
IF she does, then LEGALLY SHE has a conflict of interest, so by law SHOULD HAVE recused herself from making the call here..
More and more, it seems like ALL THREE PICKS of trumps, are just MORE RINOS like Roberts has long been.
More and more, it seems like ALL THREE PICKS of trumps, are just MORE RINOS like Roberts has long been.
Yes, must mean all Trump’s picks are no good rotten judges in your world. Cases don’t begin at the Supreme Court and this was not an emergency. There is a process and lower courts will rule first.
Already a lower court heard another case against student loan forgiveness yesterday and granted a short stay while the court examines it. It seems likely other cases will be brought using different arguments in additional lower courts and those courts will also rule. I have no idea how it will turn out in the end but the end is not yet. It seems likely the Supreme Court will rule on it in due course.
then why did she just dismiss it so flippantly?
Let’s use our most destructive and powerful weapon we have – our votes. Vote like our lives depend on them cause our lives do. So VOTE, VOTE, VOTE and make sure only “legal” votes are counted. No illegal invader should be able to vote.
And further down the deep, dark, danky, disgusting hole the US goes.