Last Updated:October 30 @ 05:39 pm

Democrats sue to end filibuster and lose

By McClatchy Washington Bureau Staff

WASHINGTON -- A long-shot lawsuit challenging the Senate filibuster rules, in part over a contentious immigration issue, was tossed out Friday by a federal judge.
In a 47-page ruling, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan acknowledged that the "filibuster rule is an important and controversial issue ... as in recent years, even the mere threat of a filibuster is powerful enough to completely forestall legislative action."

Nonetheless, Sullivan added that he was "powerless to address this issue" for several reasons.

"Reaching the merits of this case would require an invasion into internal Senate processes at the heart of the Senate's constitutional prerogatives as a House of Congress, and would thus express a lack of respect for the Senate as a coordinate branch of government," Sullivan wrote.

The government watchdog group Common Cause filed the lawsuit on behalf of itself and several members of the House of Representatives, who contended Senate Republicans had used the filibuster to block campaign finance reform legislation. Joining the suit were three individuals who said they would have benefited from the so-called DREAM Act had it not been blocked by a filibuster.

Erika Andiola, Celso Mireles and Caesar Vargas, who were born in Mexico and now live in the United States, said the stalled immigration legislation could have helped them attain legal U.S. status had the bill not been blocked.

Sullivan, though, found they lacked the legal standing to sue and said they "failed to demonstrate" that the immigration bill or campaign finance reform bill would have passed if it weren't for the filibuster.

Among other things, the filibuster requires a vote of 60 senators before the Senate can proceed with or end debate on bills. The lawsuit argued it is unconstitutional because it is "inconsistent with the principle of majority rule."

Undeniably, the filibuster has become an obstructive tool commonly deployed by members of the minority party.

"The number of actual or threatened filibusters has increased dramatically since 1970, and now dominates the business of the Senate," Sullivan acknowledged.

In 2009, the Senate counted a record 67 filibusters, which was double the number of filibusters that occurred in the entire period between 1950 and 1969. For the whole 111th Congress, which spanned 2009 and 2010, the number of filibusters had increased to 137.

As a result, Sullivan said, "many (bills) with broad bipartisan support died in the Senate without ever having been debated or voted on because of the inability to obtain the 60 votes."

Nonetheless, Sullivan noted that he was "not in a position ... to determine or predict what action the Senate might take in a final vote" on either the campaign finance or immigration bills.

Sullivan's ruling followed oral arguments Dec. 10. It is not, however, the end of discussion about revising the filibuster. Separately, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada has spoken publicly about potential filibuster reforms that might be tried at the start of the 113th Congress next month.

---

A service of YellowBrix, Inc.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 7.6/10 (14 votes cast)
Democrats sue to end filibuster and lose, 7.6 out of 10 based on 14 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

6 Comments

  1. MutantoneComment by Mutantone
    December 22, 2012 @ 11:52 am

    So How much did this cost? Who paid for it? No wait let me Guess….Us?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (8 votes cast)
    • handymanherbComment by handymanherb
      December 22, 2012 @ 5:01 pm

      Would have cost us a lot more to pass it and get the next wave of illegals heading this way, the Dem’s were supposed to shut the door after forcing Pres Regan into an amnesty bill to make all living here illegal, legal for Dem’s votes.

      The Dem’s didn’t shut the door,so instead of solving the illegal problem,got the next wave of illegals over here waiting their turn for the nexamnestyty

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.4/5 (9 votes cast)
  2. hjb2730Comment by hjb2730
    December 22, 2012 @ 12:06 pm

    “Erika Andiola, Celso Mireles and Caesar Vargas, who were born in Mexico and now live in the United States”
    Sounds like Illegals want to sue, If that is the case they should be deported now ! If you come in legal fine ! A lot of gall to sue over a law that you broke !

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (16 votes cast)
  3. BishopComment by Jamie Krasnoo
    December 22, 2012 @ 6:11 pm

    The filibuster has been a tool used by both parties since this Nation began. It is an integral part of proceedings within Congress. Harry Reid wants filibuster reform because it’s a thorn in his side in passing the legislation he wants to pass. Reid would rather have Republicans either roll over and go along with everything the Democrats want or simply step out of the way. I bet it would be quite different if the filibuster were benefiting the Democrats rather than hindering them. How about lets talk about how Reid refuses to put bills up for vote by Republicans?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (9 votes cast)
  4. slingshot383Comment by slingshot383
    December 23, 2012 @ 6:53 am

    The filibuster itself is good, but the rules they use in Washington DC is not. In Missouri, the person(s) doing the filibuster has to actually take the floor and talk. That would make the filibuster much more powerful than the rule now where they can just announce it and walk away.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)
    • aretiredgiComment by aretiredgi
      December 23, 2012 @ 11:24 pm

      Why do they need the filibuster potential, when between them they can’t even pass gas.

      When I joined the military in 1966 I took an oath to protect this country from enemies both foreign and domestic.

      I now realize who the domestic ones are, they inhabit that big building with the dome.

      Change WILL come to this once country gentlemen.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





Reference Pages

  • About
  • Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer