Last Updated:August 20 @ 02:55 pm

Why unemployment rate fell: More people give up looking for jobs

By Christopher S. Rugaber

WASHINGTON (AP) - U.S. employers added 96,000 jobs in August, a tepid figure that points to the economy's persistent weakness and slowing prospects for the unemployed.

The unemployment rate fell to 8.1 percent from 8.3 percent in July. But that was only because more people gave up looking for jobs. People out of work are counted as unemployed only if they're looking for a job.

The sluggish job growth could slow the momentum President Barack Obama hoped to gain from his speech Thursday night to the Democratic National Convention.

They could also make the Federal Reserve more likely to unveil a new bond-buying program at its meeting next week. The goal would be to lower long-term interest rates to encourage borrowing and spending.

Hourly pay fell in August, manufacturers cut the most jobs in two years and the number of people in the work force dropped to its lowest level in 31 years. The government also said 41,000 fewer jobs were created in July and June than first estimated.

___

Here's what The Associated Press' reporters are finding:

___

SHRINKING WORK FORCE

The unemployment rate declined in August, but for a bad reason: The government doesn't count people as unemployed if they've stopped looking for a job.

The number of people working or looking for work shrank in August by 368,000, the government said. The reasons vary, economists say.

Many people, after months of looking for a job without success, give up. But this group of "discouraged" workers doesn't fully capture the phenomenon.

New parents, for example, may quit a job to focus on raising children.

An older worker who's laid off may claim Social Security benefits instead of looking for a new job.

And there's also a demographic shift underlying the trend: Baby boomers are retiring.

The result is that the percentage of working-age Americans with a job or looking for one has dropped to 63.5 percent, a 31-year low.

— Christopher S. Rugaber, AP Economics Writer

___

NOT SO FAST

Will the Federal Reserve go big next week?

Some economists expect a new bond-buying program to be announced.

Others aren't so sure. Most do think the Fed will unveil something, after Chairman Ben Bernanke said last week that the Fed will do more to help the economy.

But they don't see a bold move. Not yet, anyway.

Sal Guatieri of BMO Capital Markets thinks the most likely Fed step will be to extend its timetable for keeping short-term rates at record lows. Currently, the Fed plans to keep rates there until at least late 2014. Guatieri said he thinks that target will be extended to mid-2015.

But by late December or early next year, Guatieri says the Fed could begin more bond buying, perhaps focused on lowering mortgage rates.

— Martin Crutsinger, AP Economics Writer

___

GOVERNMENTS HURTING, NOT HELPING

In normal recoveries, government hiring helps economies recover from recessions.

Not this time.

When you count the 7,000 public-sector jobs lost in August, governments at all levels — federal, state and local — have slashed 670,000 jobs since the recession ended in June 2009. By contrast, private companies have added 3.5 million jobs.

It's the first time since World War II that governments have shed jobs this deep into an economic recovery. At this point — three years and two months — into the nine previous postwar recoveries, government jobs had risen an average 8 percent.

This time, they're down 3 percent.

— Paul Wiseman, AP Economics Writer

___

OBAMA'S BREAK-EVEN MILESTONE

Here's a milestone that's difficult for President Barack Obama to brag about: There are 133.3 million Americans working — 261,000 short of the number when he was inaugurated in January 2009.

At this year's pace of job creation, payrolls would return to that level in October. And the job totals would be released Nov. 2 — four days before the election.

Of course, any comparison of now vs. then must take into account the huge numbers of jobs lost — and then gained — in between.

___

BIG HOLE TO FILL

The U.S. job market still has miles to go just to get back to where it was before the Great Recession.

The economy lost nearly 8.8 million jobs from the time employment peaked in January 2008 until it bottomed in February 2010.

Including the 96,000 jobs added in August, the United States has regained fewer than 4.1 million jobs, or 46 percent, of those lost jobs. Which helps explain why this is by far the feeblest recovery since World War II.

— Paul Wiseman, AP Economics Writer

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 9.8/10 (12 votes cast)
Why unemployment rate fell: More people give up looking for jobs, 9.8 out of 10 based on 12 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

6 Comments

  1. Mort_fComment by Mort_f
    September 7, 2012 @ 3:02 pm

    The good news is 670,000 fewer government jobs. I wonder how many of those are Federal government? The devil is in the details. Any ‘losses’ in the queen’s retinue?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
    • valboskiComment by valboski
      September 7, 2012 @ 4:39 pm

      I would guess that very few of the “government” jobs lost were at the federal level. Most were probably state and local jobs that were carried for a year by the so-called stimulus package that reportedly “saved” all those jobs. Now that the states/locals don’t have that $$$ coming in any more the layoffs/cutbacks have begun. I’d be willing to bet there are still more federal employees than before, not less.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  2. marthaComment by martha
    September 7, 2012 @ 4:42 pm

    Sooooo. I have been unemployed for a year, but was not initially looking for a job until 8 months ago. How exactly are they counting me then? How do they know I am looking? I never filled out any survey or any unemployment paperwork, so how exactly do they know?!? According to the gov’t logic, then, for the first few months I was just “not working,” then I magically became “unemployed” when I filled out my first application. Again…how did they count me? If they didn’t count me, then how do they figure they have accurate numbers?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.7/5 (3 votes cast)
    • thecitizenComment by thecitizen
      September 8, 2012 @ 4:36 pm

      The numbers are accurate in that they pull them straight out of the air after they change the ‘counting protocols’ to reflect number that makes ‘em look pretty.

      Nobody knows about the changes and even if they do the numbers are so bogged down in arcane minutia nobody can spontaneously or extemporaneously understand or argue them.

      All that said, I’d still like to know how they can possibly claim to have accurately counted you, or not, to reflect comprehensible, common sense numbers. And the same goes for everyone else counted … or not.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  3. Brian in MIComment by Brian in MI
    September 9, 2012 @ 8:08 pm

    So – why do the unions support this Bozo???

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  4. rrb1952Comment by rrb1952
    September 10, 2012 @ 11:01 pm

    Because the unions are run by Bozos. And Bozos elect those Bozos.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





News Archives

  • August 2014
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • Reference Pages

  • About
  • Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer