Last Updated:November 28 @ 05:03 pm

Federal court rejects Texas voter photo ID law; SC next

By Will Weissert

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - A tough Texas law requiring voters to show photo identification at the polls discriminates against low-income blacks and Hispanics, a federal court ruled Thursday, wiping out for the November election a measure championed by conservatives and setting up a potential U.S. Supreme Court showdown.

In Washington, a three-judge panel unanimously ruled that the 2011 law imposes "strict, unforgiving burdens on the poor" and noted that Texas' racial minorities are more likely to live in poverty.

It was the state's second major loss in court in three days, coming after a separate federal panel ruled Tuesday that Texas' Republican-dominated Legislature failed to avoid "discriminatory purposes" when drawing new maps for congressional districts and both houses of the state Legislature to reflect the Texas' booming population.

The voter ID decision could set a precedent for upcoming legal challenges to similar laws in other states. South Carolina's strict photo ID law is on trial this week in front of another three-judge panel in the same federal courthouse. A ruling in that case is expected before the November election.

It also underscores a widespread push, largely by Republican-controlled legislatures and governors' offices, to impose strict identification requirements on voters. But Democrats say fraud at the polls is largely nonexistent and that Republicans are trying to disenfranchise minorities, poor people and college students - all groups that tend to vote Democratic.

State Attorney General Greg Abbott said he will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, "where we are confident we will prevail." He pointed to past decisions upholding similar "ballot integrity safeguards" in Georgia and Indiana.

Republican Gov. Rick Perry said, "Chalk up another victory for fraud."

"Today, federal judges subverted the will of the people of Texas," he said, "and undermined our effort to ensure fair and accurate elections."

A report by the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan legal think tank in New York, determined that new voting restrictions could suppress the votes of more than 5 million young, minority, low-income and disabled voters nationwide. And election administrators and academics who monitor the issue say generally that in-person fraud is rare because someone would have to impersonate a registered voter and risk arrest.

During the Texas voter ID case, the Justice Department called several lawmakers, all of them Democrats, who said they detected a clear racial motive in the push for the law. Lawyers for Texas argued that the state was simply tightening its laws. Texas called experts who demonstrated that voter ID laws had a minimal effect on turnout, and Republican state lawmakers testified that the legislation was the result of a popular demand for more election protections.

The voter ID judges were Rosemary Collyer, an appointee of former President George W. Bush; Robert Wilkins, an appointee of President Barack Obama; and David Tatel, an appeals court judge appointed by Bill Clinton.

Tatel, writing for the panel, called the Texas law "the most stringent in the nation." He said it would impose a heavier burden on voters than a similar law in Indiana, previously upheld by the Supreme Court, and one in Georgia, which the Justice Department allowed to take effect without objection.

Thursday's decision spelled out what Texas could do to soften its voter ID law and eventually be upheld in court - but Abbott's decision to appeal means Texas may be looking for a larger Supreme Court battle regarding the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Under Section 5 of the act, Texas and all or parts of 15 other states must obtain clearance from the Justice Department's civil rights division or a federal court before carrying out changes in elections. The states are mostly in the South and all have a history of discriminating against blacks, American Indians, Asian-Americans, Alaskan Natives or Hispanics.

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said Thursday that the voter ID ruling and "the decision earlier this week on the Texas redistricting plans not only reaffirm - but help protect - the vital role the Voting Rights Act plays in our society to ensure that every American has the right to vote and to have that vote counted."

Last December, South Carolina's voter ID requirement became the first such law to be rejected by the Justice Department in nearly 20 years. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney said the attorney general made a "very serious error" by blocking it.

In 2011, new voter ID laws passed in Kansas, Mississippi, Rhode Island and Wisconsin, while Alabama and Tennessee tightened existing voter ID laws to require photo ID. Governors in Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire and North Carolina vetoed such laws.

This year, Pennsylvania enacted its own law and voting-rights groups are appealing to the state Supreme Court. And in Wisconsin, a county judge ruled in July that the state's new photo ID law impairs the right to vote. In an appeal, Republican Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen argues the law doesn't impose an undue burden because voters can get free state ID cards.


Associated Press writers Pete Yost and Mark Sherman in Washington contributed to this report.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 4.8/10 (6 votes cast)
Federal court rejects Texas voter photo ID law; SC next, 4.8 out of 10 based on 6 ratings

Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:


  1. cynicalpeteComment by cynicalpete
    August 31, 2012 @ 9:13 am

    tTis way Muslims from foreign countries cam enter the USA or have an absentee ballpt and vote for Obama

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)
  2. Jim ForsytheComment by Jim Forsythe
    August 31, 2012 @ 10:04 am

    What stupid judges! We all know that fraud is rampant in the election system. We also know who (democrats) are responsible for the fraud. Presumptively, the judges were democratic appointees which explains the stupid ruling.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (10 votes cast)
  3. capricorn1Comment by capricorn1
    August 31, 2012 @ 10:10 am

    judges are willing to do liberal bidding from the bench and to hell with america is there motto.judges should be replaced often.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.9/5 (10 votes cast)
  4. hitthedeckComment by hitthedeck
    August 31, 2012 @ 10:52 am

    Never thought a voters ID would be turned down in Texas but guess the only way to find out if voters are illegal would be to turn their names in for a free credit report.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)
  5. lowlifeComment by lowlife
    August 31, 2012 @ 11:05 am

    Another illustration of why there is no longer any justice in our court system. Any judge who would put their name to such an opinion is using their position to enforce personal political preferences, rather than rule in accord with the Constitution, or the law. Unfortunately, there is presently no practical way to remove these politically motivated morons from their judgeships. If there is ever again a competent government elected in this country, a Constitutional amendment needs to be pushed that will provide some way to keep these people from continuing to do this, with impunity, until they die, or retire (maybe limited terms, periodic re-confirmation, and/or lower standards for removal), along with a mechanism for Congress and the President to nullify improper decisions by the courts.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)
  6. outragedComment by outraged
    August 31, 2012 @ 11:15 am

    How about we all play the same game. Lets sue the TSA, banks, and any organization that requires a photo ID, for discriminating against low-income blacks and Hispanics! Now there is a legal precedence.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.3/5 (6 votes cast)
  7. middlegroundComment by middleground
    August 31, 2012 @ 11:17 am

    We love to tell others around the world how to run an honest election, but we, or at least this administration, are trying to do everything they can to keep our own elections dishonest. Frankly, I think we should go one step farther and have Visa or another credit card agency verify one-vote per person with the government paying the cost of verification.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)
  8. moparfan54Comment by Dave
    August 31, 2012 @ 11:42 am

    This ruling is disgusting, three liberal judges in Washington, can over rule a law passed by an entire legislature of a state. We are in trouble.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)
  9. andymanComment by andyman
    August 31, 2012 @ 11:59 am

    any chance we can at least outlaw shoeboxes full of ballots for democrat candidates found in trunks of cars, etc. after the ballots have been counted? We could call it the
    no more frankens law.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (6 votes cast)
  10. BillzillaComment by Billzilla
    August 31, 2012 @ 12:17 pm

    Believe it or not, it was Jimmah Carter who came up with the voter ID laws as a good idea. The very same Jimmah who travels the world to sniff out rigged elections. The second worst President now, (thanks to Barack Hussein Obama taking over the number one worst President spot), who thought voter ID’s to be a good thing. Funny thing about it is… I’ve never read or heard anything in the “main stream media” about good ole Jimmah being a racist, guess I musta missed it.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  11. BobinmsComment by Bobinms
    August 31, 2012 @ 12:20 pm

    I love the slant of this AP article.

    “The states are mostly in the South and all have a history of discriminating against blacks, American Indians, Asian-Americans, Alaskan Natives or Hispanics.” (I think he may have missed a couple of groups. “Alaskan Natives” in the South?? Wow!

    “In Washington, a three-judge panel unanimously ruled that the 2011 law imposes “strict, unforgiving burdens on the poor” and noted that Texas’ racial minorities are more likely to live in poverty.” I guess only Texas has poor racial minorities. It’s wonderful that the unforgiving burdens are not on the “rich”.

    What a piece of garbage.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  12. cynicalpeteComment by cynicalpete
    September 1, 2012 @ 12:53 am

    “discriminates against low-income blacks and Hispanics, ”
    what’s that got to do with a voter ID? Many ID cards are free or very cheap.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  13. Eagle OneComment by Eagle One
    September 2, 2012 @ 3:49 pm

    Maybe it’s my ignorance but wouldn’t a drivers license serve the same purpose? If you don’t have it or have lost it for what ever reason, your loss. No ID, No vote.
    Just taking care of business.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a Comment

Reference Pages

  • About
  • Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer