Last Updated:September 2 @ 12:47 pm

Huge deficit looms over Social Security

By Stephen Ohlemacher

WASHINGTON (AP) - As millions of baby boomers flood Social Security with applications for benefits, the program's $2.7 trillion surplus is starting to look small.

For nearly three decades Social Security produced big surpluses, collecting more in taxes from workers than it paid in benefits to retirees, disabled workers, spouses and children. The surpluses also helped mask the size of the budget deficit being generated by the rest of the federal government.

Those days are over.

Since 2010, Social Security has been paying out more in benefits than it collects in taxes, adding to the urgency for Congress to address the program's long-term finances.

"To me, urgent doesn't begin to describe it," said Chuck Blahous, one of the public trustees who oversee Social Security. "I would say we're somewhere between critical and too late to deal with it."

The Social Security trustees project the surplus will be gone in 2033. Unless Congress acts, Social Security would only collect enough tax revenue each year to pay about 75 percent of benefits, triggering an automatic reduction.

Lawmakers from both political parties say they want to avoid such a dramatic benefit cut for people who have retired and might not have the means to make up the lost income. Still, that scenario is more than two decades away, which is why many in Congress are willing to put off changes.

But once the surplus is spent, the annual funding gaps start off big and grow fast, which could make them hard to rein in if Congress procrastinates.

The projected shortfall in 2033 is $623 billion, according to the trustees' latest report. It reaches $1 trillion in 2045 and nearly $7 trillion in 2086, the end of a 75-year period used by Social Security's number crunchers because it covers the retirement years of just about everyone working today.

Add up 75 years' worth of shortfalls and you get an astonishing figure: $134 trillion. Adjusted for inflation, that's $30.5 trillion in 2012 dollars, or eight times the size of this year's entire federal budget.

In present value terms, the Social Security Administration says the shortfall is $8.6 trillion. That means the agency would need to invest $8.6 trillion today, and have it pay returns of 2.9 percent above inflation for the next 75 years, to produce enough money to cover the shortfall.

That's the rate of return Social Security expects to get from its trust funds. The problem, of course, is that Social Security doesn't have an extra $8.6 trillion to invest.

Social Security Commissioner Michael J. Astrue said he is frustrated that little has been done to solve a problem that is only going to get harder to fix as 2033 approaches. If changes are done soon, they can be spread out over time, perhaps sparing current retirees while giving workers time to increase their savings.

"It won't be easy but it's just going to get harder the longer they wait," Astrue said.

There is no consensus in Washington on how pressing the problem is.

President Barack Obama created a deficit-reduction commission in 2010 but didn't embrace its plan for Social Security: raising the retirement age, reducing benefits for medium- and high-income workers and raising the cap on the amount of wages subject to the payroll tax, all very gradually.

The issue has been largely absent from this year's presidential election. Neither Obama nor his Republican opponent, Mitt Romney, has made it a significant part of the campaign.

Blahous, a Republican, warns that the magnitude of the problem is becoming so great that "Social Security's days as a self-financing program are numbered" if Congress doesn't act in the next few years. Democrat Robert Reischauer, Social Security's other public trustee, is less dire in his predictions but has told Congress that it needs to act within five years.

Others express less urgency.

"I would like to see Congress move on this tomorrow but we do have 22 years before there is any cut in Social Security benefits," said Sen. Bernie Sanders, a liberal independent from Vermont who heads the Senate Social Security caucus. "Compared to other crises - the collapse of the middle class, real wages falling for American workers, 50 million people having no health insurance - how would I rate the Social Security situation? Nowhere near as serious as these and many other problems."

AARP, the nation's most powerful lobbying group for older Americans, agrees.

"I'm not suggesting we need to wait 20 years but we do have time to make changes to Social Security so that we can pay the benefits we promised," said David Certner, AARP's legislative policy director. "Let's face it. Relative to a lot of other things right now, Social Security is in pretty good shape."

Social Security is financed by a 12.4 percent tax on wages. Workers pay half and their employers pay the other half. Self-employed workers pay the full amount.

The tax is applied to the first $110,100 of a worker's wages, a cap that rises each year with inflation. For 2011 and 2012, the tax rate for employees was reduced to 4.2 percent but is scheduled to return to 6.2 percent in January.

Social Security's finances are being hit by a wave of demographics as aging baby boomers reach retirement, leaving relatively fewer workers behind to pay into the system. In 1960, there were 4.9 workers paying Social Security taxes for each person getting benefits. Today, there are about 2.8 workers for each beneficiary, a ratio that will drop to 1.9 workers by 2035, according to projections by the Congressional Budget Office.

About 56 million people collect Social Security benefits, and that is projected to grow to 91 million in 2035. Monthly benefits average $1,235 for retired workers and $1,111 for disabled workers.

Marge Youngs, a 77-year-old widow from Toledo, Ohio, said Social Security makes up most of her income. She's reasonably sure that Social Security's financial problems won't affect her benefits but worries about her children and grandchildren.

"We might not have to worry about it, but it's the next generation coming up that will," Youngs said.

Corryn Grace Freeman, 22, a recent college graduate from Columbia, Md., said she understands the federal government must address its growing budget problems but worries that her generation will be "penalized" for being born late.

"It's like we're paying for the current elderly, we have to save more for ourselves, and we don't get any help in the future," Freeman said. "And not to mention we're facing one of the toughest job markets that the U.S. has been faced with."

---

Associated Press writer Andres Gonzalez contributed to this report.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 8.6/10 (14 votes cast)
Huge deficit looms over Social Security, 8.6 out of 10 based on 14 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

5 Comments

  1. bgannyfComment by babs
    August 13, 2012 @ 10:52 am

    Proposed solution: (1) stop paying out to those who never paid into it. (2) if someone has annual retirement income in excess of $150,000.00 annually, they dont need social security, too. (3) get the governments hand out of the cookie jar.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (6 votes cast)
    • cynicalobserverComment by cynicalobserver
      August 13, 2012 @ 7:06 pm

      Yes, keep Congress from stealing from the SS Trust Fund. too many people are getting Social Security that have never paid a dime into it. Many are immigrants who are drawing Social Security benefits with a disabled relative.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
  2. jenerseaComment by jenersea
    August 13, 2012 @ 2:16 pm

    SS is not an entitlement, that money has been taken out of our pay checks for the last 20, 30, 40 years. We have paid our dues, get the crook’s hands off the cash. I don’t hear them talking about cutting out welfare completly. Bums that don’t work sitting around getting free money. What happened to that big surplus of money? My bet is that the parasites in Washington grabbed it for their socialist programs. No way should anyone who has worked and paid into this program get denied their money. Cut out foreign aid, it goes mostly to countries that hate us and the people who need it there, never see it. I have worked 2 jobs for about 15 years of my life to make ends meet. I have no sympathy for the ones that won’t work and want to sponge off the ones who do work.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)
  3. SamCComment by SamC
    August 13, 2012 @ 2:24 pm

    Solution….Have Government pay back (with interest}all they have “borrowed” from our Social Security trust. Period.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (6 votes cast)
  4. passthewordComment by passtheword
    August 14, 2012 @ 9:40 am

    Simple fix: Make SS a stand alone budgetary item that can not be touched by anyone. Make it illegal to touch it.

    Have the gov’t develop a plan to repay what has been robbed from the account.

    Once it is a stand alone with no way the Congress or President can touch it. Ask and I said ask the wealthiest among us to help shore SS up by donating to the fund. Especially large industries and investors whose riches are the direct result of the working man. This would be a PR campaign they could not resist.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





Reference Pages

  • About
  • Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer