Home | Commentary | News | Forum | The Loft | Online Activist | State News | Resources | Classifieds Subscribe | Mobile | RSS | Contact
Breaking News -- House passes health care bill
E-mail this story to a friend
Have comments? Send them to the editor.
Printer Friendly Version
Subscribe for Free!
Treaty signed 40 years ago limited nuclear growth
By BARRY SCHWEID
Associated Press
July 2, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) -- A landmark treaty signed 40 years ago Tuesday by 61 countries is turning out to be more successful than predicted in keeping the nuclear weapons club small.

But as a State Department official cautioned at the time in a newly published memo, the United States has limited leverage to slow down the spread of bombs.

"I don't think we are reining in technology," said Richard Rosecrance, a Harvard adjunct professor who was on the State Department's policy planning staff in 1968 when he wrote the memo for Secretary of State Dean Rusk: "That's very difficult to do. But we may be able to rein in intensions."

Rosecrance, who predicted in the memo that "nuclear proliferation will continue," said in an interview Tuesday that "when countries get close they usually hold back building a bomb."

Underscoring the problem, though, he wrote even 40 years ago that the basic secrets of bomb technology and manufacture were already widely known. And, he said, a nation could achieve an advanced state of nuclear "pregnancy" while remaining within the strictures of the treaty.

In 1963, President John F. Kennedy predicted at a news conference that he saw "the possibility in the 1970s of the president of the United States having to face a world in which 15 or 20 or 25 nations may have nuclear weapons."

"I regard that as the greatest possible danger," Kennedy said. He was not alone in that forecast.

Today, the nuclear club has nine members: The United States, Russia, Britain, France, China, India, Pakistan, North Korea and, it is generally believed, Israel.

The treaty commits the now 188 nations that have signed the accord not to acquire nuclear weapons. The five countries that had already held nuclear tests, the United States, Russia, Britain, France and China, were to pursue "effective measures" toward nuclear disarmament.

Meanwhile, India, Pakistan and Israel refused to sign the treaty.

There is virtually no movement on the disarmament front, while concern about a breakout is focused now on Iran, which claims its nuclear program is not aimed at building a bomb, and North Korea, which in 2003 became the only country to defect from the treaty. The Stalinist regime recently took some big steps, though, toward revealing essential elements of its program.

The two countries are not the only ones with the technology that very quickly can be translated to nuclear weapons. Japan and Germany are known to have the elements of a nuclear weapons program. Canada could have been an early member of the club but chose not to go ahead. South Africa had six bombs but disassembled them. Libya abandoned its program.

President Bush, marking the 40th anniversary of the signings in Washington, London and Moscow, issued a statement calling for strong action to strengthen measures designed to stem the proliferation of nuclear weapons technology.

He called the treaty, which took effect March 5, 1970, "a key legal barrier to nuclear weapons proliferation."

>> Continued -- Page 1 2

Copyright 2008 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

 

++ Check out the GOPUSA home page for the latest information.

Last Updated:
Saturday 8:13 pm EST



Not a member? Click here.
Weekend Chat by clovers
Lieberman wants probe into 'terrorist attack' by major on Fort Hood by FlaJim
Weekend Chat by Ray-Ray
Lieberman wants probe into 'terrorist attack' by major on Fort Hood by qrayjack
Discuss Issues in the Forum

Grassroots Survey Team
View recent survey results
Join the survey team!



GOPUSA Cartoons
Click here!

++ Action Alert: No more apologies....get to work!

++ Semper Fi - Now Just Die - Obama Pushes Euthanasia on Veterans

++ New Survey: Future of America's health care