Minnesota Monitor Home | GOPUSA | News | Commentary | Forum | The Loft | Online Activist | Cartoons | Classifieds

>> Recommend to Friend | >> Send comments to the Minnesota Editor

The Blame Game and Deception on DFL Health and Human Service Funding

Posted by David Anderson
May 8, 2009 at 10:51 am

>> Printer-Friendly Version

Representatives David Bly’s recent guest column in the Northfield News about funding for hospitals and nursing homes really misleads voters and taxpayers in our district.
 

This column was Bly pointing fingers and not taking any responsibility for the budget situation we are in.  Let’s not kid ourselves - the DFL had a chance to start making changes last session and willfully decided to put off changes making the situation worse.  Where was Bly's suggestions and reductions proposed last year when they knew the economy was heading south?
 

Bly wants you to have empathy and think the sky is falling in on Health and Human Service funding.  This is Bly and the DFL attempting to elevate the issue to a huge crisis much like President Obama and Rahm Emanuael prescription of “never let a good crisis go to waste.”
 

So now for reality!  The HHS Spending bill the House DFL passed (HF 1362) increases Health and Human Services spending by $2.2 billion over the last biennium.  That is a 20.4% over the 2008-2009 biennium!  Hardly the doom and gloom of massive cuts Bly was boasting.

 

Sources:  2009 HHS Spending and 2007 HHS Spending.

 

Further, HF1362 does not change eligibility requirements for Medical Assistance or MinnesotaCare at all.  HF1362 calls for a 3 percent cut to long-term care facilities and to hospitals, including reducing reimbursement rates for Medical Assistance and General Assistance Medical Care; and limiting personal care attendant hours to 310 per month per individual. 
 

While Bly and the DFL like to claim the bill CUTS more than $400 million from Health and Human Services REALITY is that instead of increasing $2.6 billion it only increases spending $2.2 billion. HF1362 appropriates $12.96 billion for 2010-11 (20.4 % increase); and $14.71 billion in 2012-13 (13.5% increase) above 2010-11 base spending.

 

Some other things that Rep. Bly did not tell taxpayers about in the bill include:

 

  • Medical Assistance healthcare for non-citizen pregnant women/childrentwo months of MinnesotaCare;
  • Coverage is provided for children without application or verification (presumptive eligibility);
  • Assets tests are removed for food stamp program eligibility;
  • A whole set of fee increases for licensing including child care centers (in-home and actual centers), day training, and a whole host of others in Article I of the bill that will drive up costs for businesses and taxpayers.;
  • Children can indicate interest in enrolling in MA/MNCare on education applications which will automatically apply for health care benefits whether needed or not;
  • In Article 6 of the legislation Medical Assistance premiums are increased for those with disabilities that are working and at the same time eligibility is expanded for non-citizens by removing limiting residency and deeming language.

 

What I would like to know is what solutions is Bly proposing or has proposed?  You look at his bill introductions and I would say outside of more spending – Nothing!

Bly voted against proposals that would: open up the health insurance market to the free market and allow more providers to offer coverage which would give Minnesotans greater choice in providers (House Journal Page 4135); increase auditing of spending of Health and Human Services to eliminate the waste and fraud (House Journal Page 4159); that would inform the Legislature of the citizenship status of those receiving welfare benefits; and prohibit funding of abortions with state taxpayer dollars (House Journal Page 4106). 

 

What it really comes down to is priorities.  Just like your family at home having to decide which areas of your budget are most important and which are not.  The State budget is the same but instead of staying within the guidelines of the resources that are available Bly and the DFL spend more than they have and expect you to make up the difference in tax increases.  Bly’s votes show his priority is increasing welfare and out of control budgets over balancing the budget deficit and keeps taxpayers on the hook for abortions.
 

What legislation did Bly introduce to spur the economy or limit government’s impact on your budget?  What legislation did Bly introduce or support that would help the budget, the businesses and families getting squeezed by government overspending and over regulating? What about getting the work done on time?

 

How will all this welfare and HHS spending program expansions be sustained when the one time federal funding expires?  You guessed it – you the taxpayer will be expected to shell out more.  Bill reductions do not control HHS spending growth as the Governor’s budget proposes which Bly criticizes. Though many of the Governor recommendations are included, the House is depending on broad tax and fee revenue increases to avoid deeper cuts and to sustain these new and expanded programs into the future.
 

HHS spending grew by $1.5 billion in the last biennium, is expected to grow by $2.19 billion in the 2010-11 biennium, and $1.7 billion in 2012-13. This is additional spending is unsustainable. The bill spends money to chase federal CHIPRA funding to add new health care enrollees, and at the same time cuts providers. This is bad policy, and indicates the downside of moving towards a government operated system, with yearly expansions of government health care.

 

This bill increases enrollment on health care programs, beginning with non-citizen pregnant women and children, and including all school children, to meet federal matching health care fund criteria. To expand enrollment, significant outreach measures are imposed to entice school children and their families to enroll in state programs.  Just what we need schools doing instead of focusing on educating our children.
 

Soliciting and increasing enrollment during a state budget deficit is irresponsible, irrational, and disrespectful to the underpaid health care providers that serve public-assisted recipients. Adding more enrollees to public health care programs is costly, and doing so creates future state obligations that are beyond our ability to fund. 
 

Rep. Bly and the DFL continue to blame the governor, claim the sky is falling, and misguide the uninformed reader.  As always the truth is in the details just not in what rhetoric Representative Bly and the DFL provide.

>> Subscribe to GOPUSA's free news and commentary updates!

No Comments »

Welcome to
GOPUSA
Minnesota

Check out more postings below.

Blocking websites of allegedly gambling sites - what's next?

Posted by David Anderson
May 8, 2009 at 10:48 am

>> Printer-Friendly Version

What if Minnesota blocked domain names and IP’s of sites it objectively views as illegal and really aren’t? And without a hearing? What if they felt bloggers opinions were hate speech when in fact it is just protected free speech by blocking their IP by demand of Administrative and Bureaucratic Officials? What if China seized the domain names of U.S. Web sites promoting religions that China bans? Or what if Nebraska seized and shut down the domain name law.com because its cutting-edge legal content, that state believed, encourages frivolous litigation in violation of state law? The list is endless……. In terms of what if’s? Many of these sites are not hosted in Minnesota or even subject to Minnesota law but that isn’t stopping Minnesota from using an archaic law to enforce its subjective and unconstitutional process.

On April 29th, the Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division (AGED) of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety announced it would require ISPs and telcos to block computers located in the state from accessing gambling sites, and said non-compliant companies would be referred to the FCC. Now, the state has sent each ISP and telco the enclosed blacklist of sites and URLs. http://www.imega.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/ab001dd4.pdf You will find a variety of online poker sites including establishments that do not even accept customers from the United States. The Department of Public Safety is also calling for companies to block telephone access to
he sites’ support numbers.

At issue is whether states and localities can legally restrict access to the Internet based on federal, city, county or state laws. Minnesota is invoking a law written before the Internet became widely accessible that pertains to common carriers -- such as the use of a telephone to call a bookie and place a bet.

Last year, Kentucky seized 141 Internet gambling domain names in an attempt to stop access to online gambling. The Kentucky Court of Appeals later stayed the forfeiture. http://www.eff.org/files/kentuckyorder.pdf Also is relevant information on domain names relevant to the Minnesota position that were raised in the Kentucky case: http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/ky_v_domainnames/amicusbriefky_0.pdf

Minnesota delivered notices to AT&T Internet Services, Charter Communications, Comcast Cable, Direct TV, Dish Network, Embarq,
Sprint/Nextel, Frontier Communications, Qwest, Verizon Wireless, and Wildblue Communications, citing U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1084, (d) which pertains to common carriers. The law reads, in part:

"When any common carrier, subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission, is notified in writing by a federal, state, or local law enforcement agency, acting within its jurisdiction, that any facility furnished by it is being used or will be used for the purpose of transmitting or receiving gambling information in interstate or foreign commerce in violation of federal, state or local law, it shall discontinue or refuse, the leasing, furnishing, or maintaining of such facility, after reasonable notice to the subscriber ... "

What is next, asking Google, Yahoo, Myspace, Facebook and others to block search results for sites that Minnesota subjectively declares a gambling website? Has AGED provided due process to any of these sites? You know notice and opportunity to be heard the cornerstone of law? Shouldn’t we as taxpayers be told who or what led to the concern of government censoring websites and IP addresses? How much are we as taxpayers expected to shell out for this big brother, big government regulation?

You can go to many of the websites and discover that many allow free play such as full tilt which I play on for free. How exactly is government going to decipher what is legitimate and what is not and should government be playing any role in that decision or not? Somebody needs to do a public information request through the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act to see what led to this call for scrutiny and needless expenditure of tax dollar money to begin with.

Poker players in Minnesota may be left with legal card rooms at racetracks and the state’s tribal casinos as the only options if the action to block 200 websites is successful. That should give us a clue that probably put the state up to this nonsense to begin with. Except those mentioned are all about gambling and many of the sites being blocked offer poker for free. Poker players throughout America should be very concerned, as should internet freedom lovers regardless of where they stand on gambling. Once we establish a process of government regulating the internet, where does it stop?

In a column published by PokerNewsDaily we find that the Director at AGED hadthis to say, “The list, which is only 200 out of literally thousands of websites, was selected at random without regards to what type of internet gambling each site is engaged in. Online poker would fall within that possibility.” So now we are making administrative decisions without due process on a range of possibilities? Citizens and taxpayers should find that disturbing. He further states that, “Online gambling has been held
to be illegal by the past three Attorney Generals and Minnesota is one of the first states to take action.”

I bet a person doesn’t have to look real hard to see the PAC, lobbyists, associations and individuals who may have donated to these last three Attorney General Candidates. But then we are talking illegal gambling and many of these sites offer poker for free. Hardly illegal now is it?

Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association (iMEGA) Chairman Joe Brennan questioned the Government’s professionalism in generating its list. According to a statement found on iMEGA’s website, Brennan explained, “We question how much thought was put into the selection of these sites. To propose censoring Minnesota residents’ Web access and not
to know which sites are even in the U.S. market makes me wonder just how seriously the Department of Public Safety is taking this action. It comes off as a half-baked attempt at intimidation rather than thoughtful enforcement.” As I mentioned above the list of 200 was generated randomly without regard to what type of internet gambling each site was allegedly even engaged in.

I am all for state rights and limited government involvement but this is about the internet which was supposed to open markets, increase competition and access worldwide. Now I believe it is time for the federal government to step in and restrict the right of states to make these kinds of decisions. This is really about interstate commerce which means states have no right regulating under the Constitution of the United States. State bureaucrats and politicians are trying harder and harder to
restrict the internet as it cuts into various revenue streams. Here in Minnesota its gambling. If federal law isn’t implemented each state will carve up the internet, removing anything that they perceive as financially or socially negative, and the era of freedom we have enjoyed for two decades will end. Next if left uncheck will see hefty state by state taxes to supposedly “level the playing field” for local retailers, followed by restrictions on academic and political websites under the guise of “social
harm?”

>> Subscribe to GOPUSA's free news and commentary updates!

No Comments »

 


Pages

Categories

Resources

Subscriptions

Organizations

Blogroll

Take Action

Archives

Meta


GOPUSA - Minnesota
Brought to you by GOPUSA
Copyright © 2009 GOPUSA.com
www.GOPUSA.com |
Powered by Wordpress