Minnesota Monitor Home | GOPUSA | News | Commentary | Forum | The Loft | Online Activist | Cartoons | Classifieds

>> Recommend to Friend | >> Send comments to the Minnesota Editor

The Blame Game and Deception on DFL Health and Human Service Funding

Posted by David Anderson
May 8, 2009 at 10:51 am

>> Printer-Friendly Version

Representatives David Bly’s recent guest column in the Northfield News about funding for hospitals and nursing homes really misleads voters and taxpayers in our district.
 

This column was Bly pointing fingers and not taking any responsibility for the budget situation we are in.  Let’s not kid ourselves - the DFL had a chance to start making changes last session and willfully decided to put off changes making the situation worse.  Where was Bly's suggestions and reductions proposed last year when they knew the economy was heading south?
 

Bly wants you to have empathy and think the sky is falling in on Health and Human Service funding.  This is Bly and the DFL attempting to elevate the issue to a huge crisis much like President Obama and Rahm Emanuael prescription of “never let a good crisis go to waste.”
 

So now for reality!  The HHS Spending bill the House DFL passed (HF 1362) increases Health and Human Services spending by $2.2 billion over the last biennium.  That is a 20.4% over the 2008-2009 biennium!  Hardly the doom and gloom of massive cuts Bly was boasting.

 

Sources:  2009 HHS Spending and 2007 HHS Spending.

 

Further, HF1362 does not change eligibility requirements for Medical Assistance or MinnesotaCare at all.  HF1362 calls for a 3 percent cut to long-term care facilities and to hospitals, including reducing reimbursement rates for Medical Assistance and General Assistance Medical Care; and limiting personal care attendant hours to 310 per month per individual. 
 

While Bly and the DFL like to claim the bill CUTS more than $400 million from Health and Human Services REALITY is that instead of increasing $2.6 billion it only increases spending $2.2 billion. HF1362 appropriates $12.96 billion for 2010-11 (20.4 % increase); and $14.71 billion in 2012-13 (13.5% increase) above 2010-11 base spending.

 

Some other things that Rep. Bly did not tell taxpayers about in the bill include:

 

  • Medical Assistance healthcare for non-citizen pregnant women/childrentwo months of MinnesotaCare;
  • Coverage is provided for children without application or verification (presumptive eligibility);
  • Assets tests are removed for food stamp program eligibility;
  • A whole set of fee increases for licensing including child care centers (in-home and actual centers), day training, and a whole host of others in Article I of the bill that will drive up costs for businesses and taxpayers.;
  • Children can indicate interest in enrolling in MA/MNCare on education applications which will automatically apply for health care benefits whether needed or not;
  • In Article 6 of the legislation Medical Assistance premiums are increased for those with disabilities that are working and at the same time eligibility is expanded for non-citizens by removing limiting residency and deeming language.

 

What I would like to know is what solutions is Bly proposing or has proposed?  You look at his bill introductions and I would say outside of more spending – Nothing!

Bly voted against proposals that would: open up the health insurance market to the free market and allow more providers to offer coverage which would give Minnesotans greater choice in providers (House Journal Page 4135); increase auditing of spending of Health and Human Services to eliminate the waste and fraud (House Journal Page 4159); that would inform the Legislature of the citizenship status of those receiving welfare benefits; and prohibit funding of abortions with state taxpayer dollars (House Journal Page 4106). 

 

What it really comes down to is priorities.  Just like your family at home having to decide which areas of your budget are most important and which are not.  The State budget is the same but instead of staying within the guidelines of the resources that are available Bly and the DFL spend more than they have and expect you to make up the difference in tax increases.  Bly’s votes show his priority is increasing welfare and out of control budgets over balancing the budget deficit and keeps taxpayers on the hook for abortions.
 

What legislation did Bly introduce to spur the economy or limit government’s impact on your budget?  What legislation did Bly introduce or support that would help the budget, the businesses and families getting squeezed by government overspending and over regulating? What about getting the work done on time?

 

How will all this welfare and HHS spending program expansions be sustained when the one time federal funding expires?  You guessed it – you the taxpayer will be expected to shell out more.  Bill reductions do not control HHS spending growth as the Governor’s budget proposes which Bly criticizes. Though many of the Governor recommendations are included, the House is depending on broad tax and fee revenue increases to avoid deeper cuts and to sustain these new and expanded programs into the future.
 

HHS spending grew by $1.5 billion in the last biennium, is expected to grow by $2.19 billion in the 2010-11 biennium, and $1.7 billion in 2012-13. This is additional spending is unsustainable. The bill spends money to chase federal CHIPRA funding to add new health care enrollees, and at the same time cuts providers. This is bad policy, and indicates the downside of moving towards a government operated system, with yearly expansions of government health care.

 

This bill increases enrollment on health care programs, beginning with non-citizen pregnant women and children, and including all school children, to meet federal matching health care fund criteria. To expand enrollment, significant outreach measures are imposed to entice school children and their families to enroll in state programs.  Just what we need schools doing instead of focusing on educating our children.
 

Soliciting and increasing enrollment during a state budget deficit is irresponsible, irrational, and disrespectful to the underpaid health care providers that serve public-assisted recipients. Adding more enrollees to public health care programs is costly, and doing so creates future state obligations that are beyond our ability to fund. 
 

Rep. Bly and the DFL continue to blame the governor, claim the sky is falling, and misguide the uninformed reader.  As always the truth is in the details just not in what rhetoric Representative Bly and the DFL provide.

>> Subscribe to GOPUSA's free news and commentary updates!

No Comments »

Welcome to
GOPUSA
Minnesota

Check out more postings below.

Minnesota DFL continue to place tax and spend ahead of taxpayers, families and businesses

Posted by David Anderson
April 29, 2009 at 1:22 am

>> Printer-Friendly Version

Minnesota government spending two years ago was on autopilot as the DFL in Minnesota spent almost $3 billion more in new spending not including the $6 billion in tax and fee increases they passed for transit and some transportation in Minnesota. Now with the economy in decline, families losing their jobs, businesses on the verge of closing what do we get from the DFL? Well more of the same of course.

Let’s just look at HF2323 which passed the House recently which without a last moment switch by Rep. Tom Rukavina would have failed in the House. Of course the DFL will spin this as only the rich will pay but that is the furthest thing from the truth - we all will pay. This bill has the following tax increases:

Income Tax: $469.5 million income tax increase
Cigarette Tax: $210 million tax increase
Alcohol Taxes: $209.4 million tax increase
Boats, ATVs & Snowmobiles: $10.5 million tax increase
iTunes Tax: $4.23 million tax increase
Gift Tax: $15 million tax increase
Yanking the Gas Tax Credit: $60.5 million
Local Option Sales Tax: $391 million

This bill shows that Democrats have two priorities: Raising taxes and protecting the welfare state. Jobs are not a priority for Democrats. Their tax increases would hit thousands of small businesses that are trying to keep the employees they have and add more. They call massive spending investments rather than what they are; more unnecessary spending.

Where else is the DFL’s priorities? Good question! While the DFL passed tax increases in the neighborhood of $1.5 billion, they also showed that they can not control spending. HF1362 which just passed the House floor increases Health and Human Services spending by $2.2 billion. The so called jobs bill SF2081 sends the wrong message by forgiving a $32.75 million loan to the City of St. Paul so the city can build a new hockey rink across from the Excel Energy Center. It also increases a so-called “Workforce
Enhancement Fee” on employers that is an absolute job killer. The DFL are telling Minnesotans it is okay for government to build a hockey rink at the same time they are cutting funding to veterans services, Public Safety.

But these taxes are not on just the rich as the DFL like to talk about. Once you hit the $30,000 to $40,000 income levels, there are more losers than winners in the Democrats tax increase. The Democrat bill not only raises taxes on those areas mentioned above, but it also yanks JOBZ tax benefits and allows every county in the state to impose a new sales tax.

The DFL tax bill takes away the mortgage interest deduction, K-12 credit, K-12 subtraction, property tax deduction organ donor credit, and child care credit. Some of these are partially offset by new substantially smaller credits or cuts, but by also repealing the gas tax credit they passed along with their gas tax increase in 2008, Democrats show that they cannot be trusted to keep these credits and may repeal them in the future.

One thing is certain that the DFL priorities are not families, taxpayers and businesses in Minnesota. All the DFL in the House have done is created a climate of more taxes and assault on your checkbook by protecting their special interests and increasing government spending in St. Paul at a time we can least afford it.

>> Subscribe to GOPUSA's free news and commentary updates!

No Comments »

Local government must tighten its belt just like taxpayers and families have to!

Posted by David Anderson
February 12, 2009 at 7:50 pm

>> Printer-Friendly Version

 

In Minnesota, as well as in Lonsdale, families, taxpayers and businesses are struggling and the economy will get worse before it improves

 

If we are to have a new day in Minnesota, and make us more competitive, we need to control spending at all levels of government, with state government taking the lead. More importantly, Minnesota must improve the business climate to create more jobs.

 

But that is where you need to help and step in.  Local elected officials are no different than any other level of government, if left unaccounted they just follow their own agenda, and listen to a few that scream the loudest for more spending and more government regulations.

 

Representative David Bly has authored a massive increase in government spending and labeled it the ‘middle class amendment” of which the sole purpose is to get the entire middle class hooked and dependent on the government..  He introduced his legislation at the end of last session and has now introduced the so called “peoples bail out” legislation.

 

I wrote Representative Bly and stated that the essentials of a vibrant and firm middle class are limited government, less taxes, along with incentives to work, save, invest and expand private businesses. 

 

Minnesotans want to stretch their hard earned dollar and decide where to spend it, what charities to give their money too, and be able to save some for a rainy day, or a kids education, or to invest in a new business.  These decisions need to happen at the family kitchen table not by special interests and politicians in St. Paul.

 

Simply doling out more money to those that pay no taxes to begin with does not work.  Taking more from those in the middle class and higher income earners will do nothing to raise the income of those who choose not to work or work very little.

 

Bly and the DFL want to add more people to the government healthcare rolls, increase regulations 100 fold by introduce job stifling carbon reduction and global warming nonsense and along with it attempt to make the entire middle class become dependent on the government.

 

Rep Bly’s response:

 

“If you fear for your children's future you should get on board with my plan. Since you don't believe government should invest in opportunity for its people I would fear for our democracy and the freedom it provides to all of us.  If you believe in anarchy and wild west justice where only those who have lots of money and guns have freedom and property I fear for your children too.”
 

 

So even with a $4-5 billion which could be a $6-7 Billion at the state level you see calls for more spending on global warming and carbon reduction nonsense further adding costs to do business in Minnesota, you have calls to increase education spending by over $2 billion dollars which is sold as making the system simpler, and more spending for arts, trails, light rail and so on and so on.  The list is endless.  You want something now, you want to pay off your political votes now is the time to ask …. Everybody is lining up at the trough.

 

The local governments are no different.  Here in Lonsdale, we have just raised fees on what seemed everything imaginable.  Taxpayers were told that new senior center that was built with TIF that includes a public library will not cost taxpayers anything.  A meeting about downtown produced calls for spending of unknown magnitude including streetscape, government buying up buildings, and countless other proposals.  At almost every council meeting there is some department, individual or contractor looking for sign off for spending including the private individuals looking to get the city to pay for all the infrastructure on their business park proposal.  A local education PTA letter called on residents to call legislators for even more money.  Will it stop?  Taxes are not unlimited as some tend to think.

 

We seriously need to put a stake in the sand and say it is time to revisit everything.  It is time to focus on priorities.  It is time to focus on core priorities and services and put off all these others until sometime down the road or not approve them at all.  I call this spending smarter.  Spending smarter makes fiscal sense.  Here’s the point: The more money that is spent on nonessential bureaucratic programs, the less there is left to adequately fund necessary programs and staff them with well trained and prepared personnel.

 

While I won’t say all of them are unworthy or even nice, the question I ask and is never asked by local officials is, “Is it a necessity, is it a core service or responsibility?”  Sure the library was built as part of a way to sell the city’s involvement in TIF but is it a necessity?  It is certainly not free as the mayor proclaimed in a recent column.  It will cost Lonsdale just over $30,000 for the last half of 2009 to pay for Northfield staff to staff the library.

 

The enormous growth in government is unsustainable. It shrinks the private sector economy by preventing families and businesses from using their money as they choose.  Only by capping total spending growth, rather than swapping between revenue streams, can the total burden on taxpayers be lightened.  This needs to be done at ALL levels of government.

 

Forcing officials in all levels of government to prioritize by taking a real look at spending, like you and I where we work and, like you and I do at home around the kitchen table, that will ensure the essential tasks to be performed are done not only effectively, but efficiently as well.

 

>> Subscribe to GOPUSA's free news and commentary updates!

No Comments »

 


Pages

Categories

Resources

Subscriptions

Organizations

Blogroll

Take Action

Archives

Meta


GOPUSA - Minnesota
Brought to you by GOPUSA
Copyright © 2009 GOPUSA.com
www.GOPUSA.com |
Powered by Wordpress