Home Fresh Ink Landlords sue Seattle to pick their own tenants

Landlords sue Seattle to pick their own tenants

OneNewsNow.com March 20, 2017 at 6:40 am 10 Fresh Ink

Landlords in Seattle, Washington, are suing the city over its newly adopted law that forces them to rent their houses on a first-come, first-served policy – taking away their right to choose a tenant using their own discernment concerning safety and reliability.

Attorneys representing the landlords argue that the new law – that was effective on New Year’s Day – is unconstitutional.

“Landlords in the city filed a lawsuit last week claiming that the new policy violates the state constitution and requesting a permanent injunction preventing the city from enforcing it – which would essentially make the law void,” TheBlaze reports. “The law went into effect Jan. 1, but is not slated to be enforced until July.”

Controversial law

Seattle – which is home to Federal Judge James Robart, who rejected President Donald Trump’s travel ban executive order on immigration – has been designated as a sanctuary city – a title its Democratic mayor has told the president he is willing to defend. Taking in a large number of recipients of government assistance, many progressive city officials have pressed for a nondiscrimination policy that forces landlords to accept rental applicants who the land owners might have second thoughts about.

“The first-come, first-served policy was adopted by the city council in August as an effort to prevent landlords from discriminating against renters who receive government assistance as a secondary form of income,” TheBlaze’s Sara Gonzales informed. “It requires landlords to develop a specific screening criteria for prospective tenants, review the pending applications in the order they were received, and make offers in that same order to those who meet the criteria. Landlords would not be able to deviate from the order [in which] applications were submitted.”

The new law is just the latest non-discriminatory legislation forced on Seattle residents who rent out their property, as they are currently compelled by the government to exercise an LGBT-friendly rental process when dealing with applicants who identify with an alternative lifestyle – including transgenders and transvestites.

“Landlords are already prohibited from discriminating against prospective tenants on the basis of gender, race and sexual orientation, but advocates of the new Seattle policy say that it is too hard to prove discrimination in court, and the new law will help with that problem,” Gonzales continued.

Appealing to existing law

Pushing back against the progressive wave sweeping over the Pacific Northwest’s most populous city, landlords are banding together in a legal offensive against Leftist city officials by arguing that the law slated to be enforced this summer violates the state constitution by forcing an unlawful seizure of property, according to the Seattle Times.

Seattle’s leading daily also reported that the landlord’s complaint against the city also claims that the new law violates the free speech protections guaranteed to all United States citizens – asserting that it tramples their due process rights, as well.

Not allowed to protect one’s family …

One couple involved in the lawsuit, Chong and MariLyn Yim, are landlords who own a duplex and a triplex. They contend that the new law works against some landlords – like themselves – and for others.

“The Yim family argues that the policy unfairly offers exemptions to those renting out mother-in-law apartments or backyard cottages, but not to those renting out duplexes or triplexes,” Gonzales informed about the couple, who live in one of their units with their children. “The Yims also say the policy prevents them from keeping their family safe in the best way they see fit.”

Jeopardizing the safety of their children – because the city wants to steamroll its progressive agenda on Seattle residents – is one of the major arguments being presented in the case.

“The Yim family cannot afford to absorb losses because of a tenancy gone bad,” the lawsuit argues. “And for a family with three children, selecting a tenant who will also be their close neighbor requires careful discretion. The Yims treasure their right to ensure compatibility and safety by choosing among eligible applicants.”

Another problem with the new policy is also argued in the suit, as excessive restrictions imposed by the city could possibly add to down time between renters – who must follow strict guidelines when searching for new roommates.

“[Chong and MariLyn] also say the policy has made it much harder for one of their tenants to find a replacement roommate, due to the stringent regulations,” Gonzales noted.

Ethan Blevins, who serves as an attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF), is representing the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. The conservative nonprofit law firm with offices in Bellevue, Washington, focuses exclusively on cases defending property rights, especially lawsuits such as the Yims — ones that are waged to protect citizens from the encroaching arm of the government.


Copyright OneNewsNow.com. Reprinted with permission.

VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 9.0/10 (3 votes cast)

Landlords sue Seattle to pick their own tenants, 9.0 out of 10 based on 3 ratings

Print Friendly

Please leave a comment below.


  1. ltuser
    ltuser March 19, 2017 at 12:00 am

    I hope these landlords Win and the city gets shutdown. If i were all those people, i would be looking for someone to buy those properties as quickly as possible, so they can LEAVE THIS “progressive” hellhole..

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  2. drillbeast March 20, 2017 at 9:13 am

    Seattle, these are the dictators YOU elected!

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (6 votes cast)
  3. odayterrence March 20, 2017 at 9:45 am

    If Seattle government is so anxious to make renting decisions…let them buy up all those rental properties (at fair market value of course) and get themselves into the rental business. Should be an eye-opening educational experience for them…as the normal expected results will find these politicians out of a job come next election.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.7/5 (3 votes cast)
    • stopspending March 20, 2017 at 11:07 am

      oda, I had the same thought about the gov buying and then renting those properties and then realized that would not show the gov anything. The gov does not care about profit and loss, they do not care if tenants destroy property, do not care if they do not pay or move out and destroy the property. Nor do they care if they rent to sexual predators or people that would endanger others in the area. If the tenants cause financial loses, the gov just takes more from the taxpayers. If there are safety issues, the gov is exempt. It is unfortunate that in these liberal areas businesses can not make even basic decisions about what is best for their business.

      VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser March 20, 2017 at 2:45 pm

      Exactly. If a private citizen rents out, they need to
      A) take out special renters insurance, on their property being leased
      B) either deal with all the hassle themselves, OR pay a leasing agency to take care of it
      C) risk losses when the tenants fail to pay up,
      D) risk loss of the property, which can also impact THEIR OWN living residences when the renters destroy things.

      Where as when the government rents, they don’t CARE about A or B, and if C or D happen, they just raise taxes on everyone else to make up for the losses…

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  4. FrankC March 20, 2017 at 10:05 am

    Doe this mean a person with asthma would be forced to rent to a person who smokes?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
    • ltuser
      ltuser March 20, 2017 at 2:54 pm

      Yup. based on the reading of this law, if someone was a smoker and they were FIRST in line to rent the place you were advertising, you would be required to lease to them..

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  5. 440volt March 20, 2017 at 12:54 pm

    What more could be expected from the openly gay mayor of Seattle and the socialist city council member. The mayor is up for reelection this year. My guess is that he will be returned to office given his “base” in San Francisco north. But as my grandmother taught me, the pendulum always swings both ways. It’s high time the pendulum swung to the right and start undoing some of this ****.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.5/5 (2 votes cast)
  6. columba March 20, 2017 at 2:01 pm

    Government control of the housing market always — ALWAYS — creates slums, housing shortages, and skyrocketing rents.

    VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 4.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  7. ltuser
    ltuser March 20, 2017 at 3:00 pm

    Of course it does Columba. People who OWN their property and are thus on the line financially for it, are MORE LIKELY to take care of it and keep it in good condition. Where as people ‘given it’ as in Section 8, don’t give a rats butt about how it looks and if it breaks, they whine till the government gives them another new nicer unit..

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)

Write a Reply or Comment