Last Updated:August 1 @ 08:34 am

Obama Says He Has Authority to 'Go It Alone' on Gun Control

By GOPUSA Staff

Barack Obama held the last press conference of his first term on Monday and doled out a large dose of left-wing policies. He wants to raise the debt ceiling... again... and he said that there are several things he can do under "executive action" to further his gun-control agenda.

In the press conference, Obama said some gun control measures "I can accomplish through executive action."

What's so pathetic is the way Obama tries to delegitimize the real concerns people, including gun owners, have regarding the direction of the country. To say that the rise of attendance at gun shows and the increase in the purchase of guns is due to "ginned up" fears is completely irresponsible and wrong.

People ARE concerned. And the NRA doesn't have to say a word. Any time a liberal politician speaks about guns, gun sales go up. Barack Obama should be asked about that. Instead he's given a free pass to blast gun-rights advocates while dismissing people's concerns with partisan jabs.

Let's enforce the laws on the books. Let's have people keep guns out of the hands of crazy people, and let's keep the government out of our business!

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 9.4/10 (468 votes cast)
Obama Says He Has Authority to 'Go It Alone' on Gun Control, 9.4 out of 10 based on 468 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

91 Comments

  1. Blu OwenComment by Blu Owen
    January 14, 2013 @ 1:34 pm

    ONE SENSIBLE APPROACH TO GUNS.
    Since we have a 2nd Amendment, government is required to take a hands off approach to keeping firearms from law abiding citizens. This does not mean that we cannot take a sensible approach to tracking weapons that are used in commission of a crime. If all weapon makers were required to give the government the serial number and the rifling profile for every weapon produced this would enable the government to more easily track a weapon if it was used in a crime. Rifling profiles are now used after the fact but only if they can get possession of the gun.
    Since gun dealers keep track of guns sold by serial number, law enforcement would have a way of at least starting to track the gun in question from the original owner.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 1.3/5 (155 votes cast)
    • usafoldsargeComment by usafoldsarge
      January 14, 2013 @ 2:12 pm

      Hitler would love you…… This nothing more than another form of registration.. If they are keeping track of serial numbers, these records are only to be kept by the FFL, not the FED Gov’t.BUT, don’t you think that these records would be used as an aid in confiscation. Imagine the storage facility required to store 2 or 3 fired projectiles????? All new weapons come with 2-3 spent casings to aid in identifying a weapon, suppose you want these on file with the gov’t as well? Strange but the crimes everybody is harping about, are the ones where they had the weapons immediately upon cease fire and the usual subsequent suicide or copcide….. Armed robberies where the criminal is caught is usually done with a stolen weapon anyways. With your system, the owner whose weapon was stolen and was recovered but the criminal wasn’t will have to jump through hoops proving it wasn’t him that committed the robbery. Once again, it would be the legal weapon/owner that would be subjected to the government control..
      Surrender any little bit of liberty to a government for security and you will, in a short time have neither

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (198 votes cast)
    • cj01Comment by cj01
      January 14, 2013 @ 2:18 pm

      Unfortunately, similar approaches have been tried (e.g. new pistols are all shipped with spent shell casings fired from that pistol and, in some states, are registered) resulting in 0 crimes solved, and in some cases (e.g. Canadian Registry) as massive expenditure.

      The problem with measuring rifling at the beginning of a firearm’s life is that the effect changes over time, and barrels are easily replaced (in fact must be replaced after a certain amount of use).

      All potentially ideas worth considering on the surface, but once someone actually familiar with the operation of firearms gets involved, many ideas like this (and many of those being proposed around the country) simply wouldn’t help anything except create more government bureaucracy…sort of like prohibiting bayonet lugs or grenade launchers on firearms in the 1994 ban…forcing the government to track essentially useless items while doing nothing to actually prevent anything (when was the last time you heard of a bayoneting or grenade anywhere other than on TV or in a movie?).

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (93 votes cast)
    • catmanComment by catman
      January 14, 2013 @ 2:41 pm

      Blu…

      You obviously know nothing about firearms.

      1 – The records of firearms are only valid for a short time. Even the FBI does not trace firearms years after it was last sold through a dealer.

      2 – Barrels are replaceable on most firearms, so it would be logistically impossible to keep track of 600,000,000 firearm bullet samples.

      3 – On many firearms, the bullet is destroyed when it is fired, so there is no bullet to match… just a bunch of pieces.

      4 – Who would fire the 600,000,000 firearms and catch what bullets they could… and who would pay fir the $300 per gun that it would cost to label and computer index each bullet… that would add up to $180,000,000,000 ($180 Billion dollars), and if you assigned 3,000 people to do the job, it would take 100 years to do it.

      Are you crazy!

      I love it when people that know nothing about firearms, “have solutions”.. it never stops being stupid!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (143 votes cast)
    • Blu OwenComment by Blu Owen
      January 14, 2013 @ 2:44 pm

      Being a very pro 2nd Amendment gun owner, I would ask the people who replied to my comment, what would you suggest?
      Perhaps a one strike law that if you use a gun in a crime and are convicted you are given a mandatory 10 year sentence with no parole. Drastic yes effective it would probably take less than 5 years to find out.
      Post some suggestions…

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 2.4/5 (63 votes cast)
    • msatta2dComment by msatta2d
      January 14, 2013 @ 2:59 pm

      How do you think they were able to rid all the Jews in Germany of their guns if not through registration. If we really want to get serious about gun control STOP ATTACKING THE LAW ABIDING CITIZENS!
      Rather make it mandatory for every citizen over the age of 18 to own and know how to operate via NRA or local police lessons. If a person does not want to own a gun, he will simply pay a $500 tax for the luxury of not owning a gun and it will be mandatory that he have a “Gun Free Zone” sign showing at his place of residence.
      If a criminal is found to be in possession of a gun whether he has used it or not in connection with any crime will automatically serve 3 yrs. in jail with no parole.
      THAT is how you stop crime – NOT by taking guns from law abiding citizens. The only reason for the confiscation of guns anywhere at any time has ALWAYS been to enslave the people, and for NO OTHER REASON!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.7/5 (115 votes cast)
    • catmanComment by catman
      January 14, 2013 @ 3:02 pm

      “Being a very pro 2nd Amendment gun owner, I would ask the people who replied to my comment, what would you suggest?
      Perhaps a one strike law that if you use a gun in a crime and are convicted you are given a mandatory 10 year sentence with no parole. Drastic yes effective it would probably take less than 5 years to find out.
      Post some suggestions…”

      Blu… the problem with this “Approach” is that the criminals are not afraid of prison… they commit suicide after they have killed the innocent victims. What do you do then… and if they are not dead, they don’t care if they go to jail.

      You want to put armed robbers in jail for 10 years, no prole, sure, everyone is for that (except Jessie Jackson and Al Sharpton)… but you are doing nothing to address the insane person.

      There is no solution to madness. While it is shocking and tragic, it is nothing compared to many other needless deaths that happen everyday, and don’t make the 6 o’clock news.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (52 votes cast)
    • brierebearComment by brierebear
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:03 pm

      Msatta and others, exactly WHO is taking away guns? I live this “confiscation” argument … it is illogical to believe that more than 300 million guns could be confiscated, and the president didn’t do it in the first 4 years (just as he hasn’t installed socialism / communism), and won’t in the next 4.

      Msatta, I find you suggestion of slamming people like myself (those who have and will never touch a gun) with some form of a tax (for what reason, I don’t know). With the crazies discussing putting armed guards in public schools, would you support a user fee attached to guns for use in paying for these guards? Local taxpayers should not have to do this.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 1.3/5 (50 votes cast)
    • texasindComment by texasind
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:23 pm

      Wrong place to talk “sensible” anything,Blu! The only shades on this site are black and white. Catman’s list is especially precious. He can’t possibly envision that the FBI’s records retention might be extended to, say, forever. Or that we might establish a system of recording rifling profiles for new guns without going back and profiling existing ones. If you can’t have a perfect system, even one that improves as new guns accumulate, why bother? And some barrels will be replaced, and some bullets will be too destroyed to be unidentifiable, so to heck with rifling profiles. You just don’t know anything about guns, Blu. And anyway, it’s all a ploy for Obama to take away our guns and make himself dictator! What a bunch of loon-birds!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 1.9/5 (41 votes cast)
    • Texas GuyComment by Texas Guy
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:32 pm

      You people who want to perform any type of “registration” (if it looks like duck, walks like a duck, sounds like a duck…) should study the Dunblane Massacre, then follow it up with a study of the Snowflake Campaign. Here’s a teaser question: how much did gun-related crime rise in the UK after both of the above? I know the answer, and it’s not pretty. And by the way, both of them have close parallels to what is going on in this country right now.

      That screwball who is occupying OUR white house should read up on this. Not that anyone of his ilk is going to pay much attention; history and precedent don’t mean much to wanna-be tin pot dictators.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (76 votes cast)
    • mrpilkingtonComment by mrpilkington
      January 14, 2013 @ 5:31 pm

      Your first statement seems very naive. You have fallen into the left wing trap of blaming the gun. It ain’t the gun!

      The government has no business knowing whether you own a gun or not, much less the serial numbers and the rifling. If people like Obama know you have guns and know the serial numbers, their next step will be to knock on your door and tell you to give them up.

      Your second statement makes perfect sense and that’s why the left wing loons will never go for it. It’s the very same crowd that wants to take away the rights of law abiding citizens who think it’s cruel and unusual punishment to put bad guys in jail and throw away the key.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.6/5 (50 votes cast)
    • socialismisevilComment by socialismisevil
      January 14, 2013 @ 7:02 pm

      Blu

      one strike laws dont work

      bad people dont follow the laws

      THEY MAKE “GUNS” while in prison

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.2/5 (17 votes cast)
    • jstealeComment by jsteale
      January 14, 2013 @ 10:00 pm

      Unfortunately the average criminal is much smarter than you are. They rarely attempt to buy guns legally that they intend to use to commit crimes. Tracking guns would cost a lot of money and would be utterly useless in tracking crime guns except for those few instances where a legal owner uses his legal gun to commit a crime. Once a gun is stolen the trail would go cold and since criminals get their guns through the black market tracing would accomplish nothing.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (26 votes cast)
    • jstealeComment by jsteale
      January 14, 2013 @ 10:14 pm

      brierebear – Who is going to pay for armed guards? People who want their kids to be safe while in school can pay. School departments can get rid of some of the teachers assistants and even some teachers who are indoctrinating the kids of America to pay for the armed guards. We pay to have armed guards guarding our money, our sporting events, our courtrooms but we don’t care to protect our kids? Plenty of places have armed guards and no bats an eye at that. Why on earth would anyone not want to protect their kids? The Israelis did exactly that and the Palestinian terrorists stopped targeting schools.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (28 votes cast)
    • torkwrench3699Comment by torkwrench3699
      January 14, 2013 @ 10:15 pm

      There is a lot of discussion about methods and costs associated with registration and bullet tracking. In fact, even if this was implemented the bullet results in most cases would be inconclusive. My angle is how would registration/bullet tracking deter crime? All the mass shooters I know of didn’t care if you matched bullets and firearms or not. Most committed suicide anyway. If you are in a dangerous and unstable mind frame, shooting people in public places in broad daylight, why would you care if they can track the gun/bullets back to you? NO deterrent there! Would it be a consolation to the parents? Your daughter was killed in a mass shooting but we traced the gun back to Joes Gun Shop? Lets take the billions it would cost to register/track our guns and invest in mental health, job creation, gang intervention, criminal prosecutions, and other such truly meaningful focal points.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (24 votes cast)
    • jstealeComment by jsteale
      January 14, 2013 @ 10:29 pm

      Texasind – Yeah, this country is so rich that we can easily afford to spend billion upon billions of dollars for virtually nothing in return. You would have us spend these billions of dollars for centuries before all the pre-existing guns have worn out and we would have system that might be helpful if criminals become so stupid over that time that they will use a gun they know can be tracked to them to commit their crimes and technology has stagnated to the point that guns are still the supreme small arm.

      Are you interested in solving the problem of mass shootings or are simply interested in spending a large amount of money so that you can proclaim that at least you did something. The common factor in all of these mass shootings is that the shooter choses soft targets where they know that they will have plenty of time to kill a lot of people before armed response shows up. If you are really interested in solving the problem figure out how to get armed response on site faster, thus the call for armed guards.

      Michael Reagan asked his father’s security team why they couldn’t stop Hinckley from shooting the most well protected human on earth. HE replied that no one could stop the crazies. Hinckley got 6 shots in 1.7 seconds with a revolver. Hinckley was taken down immediately because armed response was on site immediately. He was still able to shoot 2 people, but no one died.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (22 votes cast)
  2. Chuck AnziulewiczComment by Chuck Anziulewicz
    January 14, 2013 @ 1:37 pm

    Sadly, I think the NRA is right: There will probably be NO new laws affecting gun ownership. No new gun registration, no limits on clips and ammo, no bans on assault weapons, NOTHING. All you have to do is go to the wingnut websites like InfoWars and WorldNetDaily, where commentators are promising civil war and armed revolution if ANY new gun control laws are passed; how do you argue against such threats? Conservative commentator Ben Shapiro predicts a “tyrannical” U.S. government in the next 50-100 years; how does one respond to such prophecies?

    There WILL undoubtedly be more massacres in the future in schools and churches and restaurants, but let there be no more wailing and gnashing of teeth when they occur, no more hand-wringing, because this is the price we have to pay to indulge gun nuts in their little “hobby.”

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 1.3/5 (129 votes cast)
    • usafoldsargeComment by usafoldsarge
      January 14, 2013 @ 2:23 pm

      Do you know the meaning of tyranny?????? In our country, it will be the complete subjugation of the people by the Federal government. It will take far less than 50 years, believe me. And I have watched it grow to fruition over the past 60 years one little piece by little piece. Be sure to put a sign in front of your house to let your community know your stance and don’t expect any defense if it should happen in your lifetime

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (119 votes cast)
    • cj01Comment by cj01
      January 14, 2013 @ 2:28 pm

      Little hobby? Nothing about the rights being argued say anything about hobbies or hunting…that’s something made up as an argument in the past few decades, and people can’t seem to let go despite having been proven incorrect at all levels of government.

      Unfortunately, I fail to see how ANY of your suggestions would actually stop anyone from committing the very crimes your describe. No matter WHAT weapon is chosen, an insane person armed with anything in an environment where they know there can be no resistance will have free reign until armed resistance arrives. Be it a knife or sword, shovel, revolver, hunting rifle, or ‘evil’ rifle, you’re stuck cowering until someone with a weapon gets there.

      So would you feel morally superior watching a suicidal madman beating your spouse or child with a shovel while waiting for someone with one of those evil firearms to show up? I pray you and I never have to find out, and the odds say we won’t. But I’d feel much safer having someone vetted and trained in my child’s school in the event one of these suicidal maniacs made it in there…particularly since they fairly regularly stop their attack the moment they feel the least bit threatened.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (99 votes cast)
    • ChewyBeesComment by ChewyBees
      January 14, 2013 @ 2:47 pm

      I don’t usually attack people, only topics, but here an exception must be made.

      There are very few reasons comments like this would be made. The most common is that the writer lives in a veil of security and feels that veil can never be taken down.

      So where do you live that is forever secure? Is it an upscale jewish neighborhood? Do you have police cars parked outside 24/7 because you are one of the special people?

      Where do you get your food? It must be the grocery store, an American icon too big to fail, lol. And when it does fail, how will you find food? Will you order off the Internet? Or is there some magical garden that produces cheeseburgers and tacos you can start up in a Chia jar in the corner?

      Where does your water come from, all clean and sparkly? Is it the magical faucet or the on time bottle delivery? When that suddenly stops working, or is more brown than the city river, then what will you do?

      What is your source of income? Do you produce anything, or push buttons and papers around in exchange for Federal debt notes?

      Who are your associates? Like minded people, I would guess, constantly reassuring each other that you’ve got all the answers when a review of the above is proof positive you are in control of nothing, that your entire life’s existence is dictated by heroic images on TV.

      The reason for a gun isn’t just in cast things go south, it is to keep them from going south. There has never been a nation in the world that hasn’t been ransacked after a societal implosion, except one. This nation is headed in that direction, and guns in the hands of men are one of the few things that is stopping it.

      Loud mouthed control freaks licking grease of one hand while typing with the other are the tool of the psychopath. You are a tool.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.7/5 (102 votes cast)
    • vtdaveComment by vtdave
      January 14, 2013 @ 3:02 pm

      usafoldsarge, Chuck knows a lot about tyranny. Chuck, and others like him, are using “tyranny of the minority” to push the agenda of his “hobby”. You see, Chuck, and his ilk, like to cry “democracy, democracy!” until the voting public votes an overwhelming “NO!” at which point they then go to court and have the court rule the vote unconstitutional. You know what I am talking about, don’t you, Chuck? It is funny how the Constitution suits him just fine when used as a tool to push his agenda, which, mind you, is not directly enumerated/supported in the US Constitution, but, when used to support a directly enumerated right he is blind to it and feigns dismay over the possibility that no changes will be made in regards to gun ownership. Sorry Chuck, but nothing short of an amendment to the US Constitution is legal in regards to the 2nd Amendment.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.7/5 (50 votes cast)
    • Jota_Comment by Jota_
      January 14, 2013 @ 3:50 pm

      “There WILL undoubtedly be more massacres in the future in schools and churches and restaurants” – Chuck Anziulewicz

      And you think if there were more laws affecting gun ownership. more gun registration, limits on clips and ammo, and bans on assault weapons, then no more massacres anywhere?

      Of course not, you know good and well more laws, more registration, more restricts has nothing to do with stopping massacres but disarming the public

      If you really wanted to stop massacres you would advocate for getting rid of gun free zones which loudly shouts, it is a massacre ready site and put an armed guard in place to shoot the madman

      That is what you would do if you wanted to stop massacres, but you don’t, you just want make everyone a victim when a madman runs the government

      But that can never happen, just like we were told about gun free zones, it will be so safe, just trust us.

      And speaking of a madman, Obama thinks he has authority to subvert the Constitution by the Constitution? Sounds crazy to me!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (63 votes cast)
    • handymanherbComment by handymanherb
      January 14, 2013 @ 3:57 pm

      Chuck You, the places where the shootin’s are happening, are in gun free zones where honest citizens, can’t carry their weapons for self defence.

      But you think the answer is to take guns away from a citizen, who has done nothing wrong, who just wants to defend their family or others.

      I suggest you look what happened down under and what they have to say about giving up guns

      https://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=fGaDAThOHhA

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (45 votes cast)
    • kskiddComment by kskidd
      January 14, 2013 @ 3:59 pm

      Chuck … “because this is the price we have to pay to indulge gun nuts in their little “hobby.”

      No, Chuck, this is the price we have to pay for liberal stupidity. Liberals ransack the political and moral foundations of the United States, and then, having created such a mess that the average kid doesn’t know who or what to believe and ends up believing in nothing, accept death, and then they (the liberals) say “This is because there are guns!”

      If you could get rid of every gun in the country, including the ones owned by those who break any law you may come up with (you cant, but if you could) then you’d have kids attacking with knives, arson and home made pipe bombs.

      And I’m sure that sooner or later, liberals would get around to blaming it on people who believe there is a difference between right and wrong, as they always do.

      Guilt transference: The life’s blood of all liberal agendas.

      Besides, the comment you made and I quoted is not even original. You’re just repeating what the current politically correct pretty boy mouth piece of liberal insanity and anti-constitutional freedom said.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (42 votes cast)
    • bboy32Comment by bboy32
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:02 pm

      During the 10 years of the Clinton gun ban, from 1995-2004, there were 182 mass shootings with 820 victims. It didn’t work!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (41 votes cast)
    • highsiderComment by highsider
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:07 pm

      Chuck Auschwitz, You are either a poor soul having trouble getting your three brain cells close enough to rub each other, or you are a Socialist/Communist Troll. In either case you should post your drivel on one of the inane progressive websites. I discount your opinion about anything.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (30 votes cast)
    • jstealeComment by jsteale
      January 14, 2013 @ 10:45 pm

      By the tenor of your comments I am guessing that you are blissfully unaware of the spate of mass stabbings of school children in China, not to mention hammer attacks and clever attacks, and ax attacks over the last 2 years. How could there possibly attacks at schools when the Chinese subjects are not allowed to have guns?

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (15 votes cast)
    • mstrong1Comment by mstrong1
      January 15, 2013 @ 10:28 am

      “There WILL undoubtedly be more massacres in the future in schools and churches and restaurants”….. NOT at ANY time I happen to be visiting any of these locations……..

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)
  3. americanjoeComment by americanjoe
    January 14, 2013 @ 2:28 pm

    There is no such thing as sensible gun control! Blaming a firearm for a death is about as stupid as blaming the car for a death in a car crash. If that was the case we would save more live by banning cars that we would guns. It’s the criminals that are killing people, not the guns. I can kill a person with my bare hands, are they going to ban hands? No, because that would be stupid. Just like the morons that keep calling civilian AR’s assault rifles. An assault rifle is a rifle capable of firing more than one round per squeeze of the trigger. Civilian AR’s are semi-automatic which means they only fire one round per squeeze of the trigger. Another thing the AR in AR-15 does not stand for Assault Rifle, it stands for Armalite Rifle. That’s the manufacturer of the first AR-15. The second amendment is there to keep this country from becoming what we escape from in first place, a tyrannical government! I have never killed anyone that wasn’t trying to kill me first! You need guns in the hands of good guys to combat the guns in the hands of the bad guys. If you take the guns from the good guys, then only the bad guys will have them. I don’t like that balance of power, not going to work for me.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (82 votes cast)
  4. NewsWatcherComment by NewsWatcher
    January 14, 2013 @ 2:37 pm

    No. This is enough. This arogant dictator must be dealt with proplery. He has shown his disdain for the very document he pledged to defend. He has shown his disdain for the rule of law in this country. This is impeachable .. AND it must be done. I don’t care if you are conservative or liberal .. this man cannot continue in the office of the presidency if we are to survive as a free country and a free people.

    It is time to say .. “Enough!”

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (87 votes cast)
    • wharmanComment by wharman
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:12 pm

      Only problem is that some of the ones that would bring impeachment charges against him are encouraging him to subvert the legal process and they are the ones who helped get him in office in the first place.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (27 votes cast)
    • bf39Comment by bf39
      January 14, 2013 @ 7:07 pm

      I agree NewsWatcher. I, like Donald Trump, would like to see obama’s authentic birth certificate, not copies someone has created.
      And as far as I am concerned he has taken too much “executive action” already and created a giant debt for the American People.
      mr. president, why don’t you use your “executive action” to pay back the Social Security LBJ “borrowed” back in the 60′s?
      Then you wouldn’t have to threaten the Seniors with stopping their check.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (13 votes cast)
    • wildflower0928Comment by wildflower0928
      January 15, 2013 @ 1:56 am

      I could care less about his birth certificate, his mama, his daddy or any of that! I care about what he is doing to this country of ours. He has broken more laws than have been written to protect and preserve. He has murdered our way of life, stripped us of our essential beliefs and freedoms, demoralized us to the rest of the world. God has been taken from our children, our Pledge to our Flag, our Christmas. He has signed more executive orders in his first term than presidents combined. He acts as a king. We broke from a king. He is our employee. He threatens us with cuts to Social Security, our money. He threatens us with cuts to veterans. they’ve earned more than what they get. he doesn’t threaten cuts to Congress or Vice-Presidential pay. He doesn’t threaten cuts to his pay. He doesn’t threaten fewer vacations. He threatens those of us he is supposed to serve. He resides in our house. He should live by our rules. He makes his own and he garners those to him who will not and do not defy him. He is a traitor and does not deserve to hold the office of President of the United States.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (13 votes cast)
    • bf39Comment by bf39
      January 15, 2013 @ 1:41 pm

      Wildflower0928 if he wasnt born in the U.S., he cant be president.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  5. shafawnComment by shafawn
    January 14, 2013 @ 2:46 pm

    They’re all a bunch of traitors and Communists and we’re sitting on a powder keg. It wouldn’t take much to light the fuse
    Obamacare crushing small business and staggering unemployment will light the match.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.9/5 (43 votes cast)
  6. pwpmmpComment by pwpmmp
    January 14, 2013 @ 2:51 pm

    Obama, the man who would be king. Give a little man a little power and you get a little tyrant.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (52 votes cast)
    • calizuz1Comment by calizuz1
      January 14, 2013 @ 8:11 pm

      Little brain led by those elitists who would rule the world.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (10 votes cast)
  7. mbmbcsComment by mbmbcs
    January 14, 2013 @ 3:10 pm

    This man is the epitome of evil, arrogance, selfishness, stupidity. He says no guns in schools but there are photos of armed guards protecting his kids. He has used 20 innocent kids to run gun control down our throats. He could care less about the massacre of those kids

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.9/5 (49 votes cast)
  8. js071257Comment by js071257
    January 14, 2013 @ 3:15 pm

    Obama has learned his Alinsky/Marxist lessons well. He understands with a majority of the masses dependent on government he can attempt to overturn what the founding fathers envisioned would happen, which is why the second amendment IS the second amendment.

    He would love nothing better than to enflame gun owners to declare a national state of emergency to implement gun seizure and martial law.

    He is officially a lame duck and we need to keep the pressure on those still willing to stand in his way, not lose our cool, and wait him out.

    Above all, pray pray pray for the health of the conservatives on the Supreme Court which is where the balance of power and our final wall against him lies.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.9/5 (42 votes cast)
    • shafawnComment by shafawn
      January 14, 2013 @ 3:34 pm

      And bombard Washington, representatives and senators and write to Obama himself and tell him NO Obama is NOT a king. He is a hired employee of we the people and he is NOT representing what we want.
      He is representing a socialist agenda and we want him fired for it.

      If any president EVER needed impeaching.. OBAMA does!

      IMPEACH OBAMA!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (42 votes cast)
    • tmbryantComment by tmbryant
      January 14, 2013 @ 3:43 pm

      He may be a lame duck in that he can’t run for re-election, but with 4 more years left on his term, he can certainly do a lot more damage to our country. I’ll agree with shafawn, if there was ever a a president who needed impeached, it’s Obama. Since impeachment comes from the Senate and with a communist party control of the Senate, it’s going to take something pretty bad for them to throw a president of their own party under the bus.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (32 votes cast)
    • calizuz1Comment by calizuz1
      January 14, 2013 @ 8:13 pm

      Unfortunately, ya’ll, he has half the country hoodwinked. He is the anti-Christ, literally.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (10 votes cast)
  9. kskiddComment by kskidd
    January 14, 2013 @ 3:50 pm

    I am confused. Did he say he has the authority to ‘Go It Alone’ on Gun Control or did he say “some gun control measures “I can accomplish through executive action.” ”

    I notice that “some gun control measures” is written as if it were part of a sentence that ends “I can accomplish through executive action.”

    Two ideas put together in one sentence with only half of it in quotes. I’m not saying that it was, but how do I know that the second part of that whole sentence, “I can accomplish through executive action.” is not being taken out of context?

    Having said that:

    Perhaps there are some things he can do legally through executive action on the issue of gun control, but I can’t imagine what they would be, given the wording of our second amendment.

    But then, he’s the same guy who said General Motors was to big to fail, who nationalized some of our banks, who shoved obamacare and it’s infringement upon religious freedom down our throats and has appointed a multitude of ‘czars” to create policy and oversee aspects of our government and lives without any input from congress, such as congressional approval of said czars (wasn’t one of them a communist?)

    Who knows what this guy thinks he can do. I am sure that as the appointed “lord and savior” of so many voters, he believes he also has authority to walk on water.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.7/5 (29 votes cast)
    • LenaComment by Lena
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:28 pm

      Kidd, a lot of your posts sound like a liberal trying to pretend he’s a conservative. You throw doubt on the author by pretending you’re not quite sure what Obama said. Everyone knows that Obama’s words are the ones in quotes. If you doubt the writer’s characterization, then watch the video. Listen to Obama’s words.

      If you still doubt that Obama is going after guns by whatever means necessary you are trolling the wrong website.

      Conservative sites have been infested with trolls since the election and I especially dislike the ones like you that are just too cute by half.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.6/5 (22 votes cast)
    • kskiddComment by kskidd
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:40 pm

      Well, Lena, just trying to be honest. Funny, trouble makers think I’m a coward, easy going people think I’m a trouble maker. Christians think I’m a deviant, deviants think I’m a religious nut. Rich people think I live on welfare and welfare people think I’m rich because I don’t vote for democrats (not ever). No matter what I say, I expect someone to find something wrong, but I do ok.

      My opening statement about the things written by the author were honest. But yes, I do believe Obama is an abomination, as are Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, people who think you can prove what love is by marrying some one of the same sex, people who think killing babies is good because it grants sexual freedom to women and irresponsibility to men for just a few dollars. No, I do not believe in shooting liberals or buying new guns in preparation for a second revolutionary war. I believe America exists because of the divine providence the signers of the Declaration of independence believed in, I hate communism, socialism, fascism and slavery as a matter of principle.

      But, I appreciate you calling me a troll so that tonight, when I count my blessings before I head to bed, I can thank God you are not my wife :)

      By the way, yes, I missed the video, because I am having trouble with my computer and videos do not play well, and I know that Obama will go after not just guns, but any American freedom any way he can.

      May I suggest that you stop trolling around for people to insult? I mean, if that’s why you come here, try face book. You’ll be right at home.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 3.5/5 (15 votes cast)
  10. Gil GileyComment by Gil Giley
    January 14, 2013 @ 3:56 pm

    Obama will flex his muscles and threaten to rule by executive order against the Second Amendment. Good luck, he may have thrashed our Constitution in the past but this move is much different. He needs 2/3 of the states to ratify the Second Amendment.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (19 votes cast)
    • walker2005Comment by walker2005
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:10 pm

      The Left has been choosing to focus on the gun in “gun violence” because they have an agenda to turn us all into slaves of the state. We need to bring the discussion around to the real issue. Mental illness. Besides the firearms, the common denominator with the killers was mental illness. Mental illness that was observed by many who came forward after the crisis but did nothing to deal with it before the killer(s) went on a rampage. Political correctness plays a part in this as well. Case in point…Fort Hood. Major Hasshan was “promoted” up the chain of command because his superiors were afraid of a backlash from the politically correct. Such a reaction could adversely affect their career.

      It’s not the gun. It’s the person.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (24 votes cast)
    • calizuz1Comment by calizuz1
      January 14, 2013 @ 8:16 pm

      Ditto walker2005. Serfdom here we come. Criminals will still have guns.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (10 votes cast)
  11. Pingback: Obama Says He Has Authority to 'Go It Alone' on Gun Control - ALIPAC

  12. specwar4Comment by specwar4
    January 14, 2013 @ 4:00 pm

    Imagine yourself as a White Male in his 20′s nowdays. No Hope of a job, No hope of a house, No hope of a girlfriend that hasn’t been tainted by an A.A.Male. No hope at a chance for success, No hope of ever being considered 1st on the list for anything. No Hope Period. All of this caused by Barack Obama and Leftist Liberals. Nothing anyone can say or do can change the “Gun” Issue because it is not the true “Issue”. Lack of Faith in God and No Hope for America is the true underlying issue. Obama can Executive Order us into the ground and the problem will just get worse. The American People and the Republican Party Need a Little Spark of Hope…

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.4/5 (28 votes cast)
    • kskiddComment by kskidd
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:26 pm

      Spewar4… “magine yourself as a White Male in his 20′s nowdays. No Hope of a job, No hope of a house, No hope of a girlfriend that hasn’t been tainted by an A.A.Male. No hope at a chance for success, No hope of ever being considered 1st on the list for anything. No Hope Period”

      I hope I am not out of line by guessing that you are a young soldier. Been there, felt that way, and discovered with the passage of time that 1) A man only needs one woman, and 2) there are millions to choose from: Perhaps you should look somewhere else. As for the rest of that, move to a new location. America is a big place. There is opportunity to be found (so long as you are not spending your time looking for 4 leaf clovers in the back yard or down at the local convenience store buying lottery tickets).

      There is always hope. Have a little faith, and keep in mind that the kind of faith that moves mountains always carries a pick and a shovel. Don’t give up. You may not be a soldier, but if you are, learn that you can do one year at a time in anybodies outfit and then one more year at a time until you get out. If you are not a soldier, quit looking at the local horizon. Pull up stakes and go find your niche. It’s there someplace. America, for all her problems, still offers hope and opportunity to millions (We have a huge immigration problem, but we are one of the few nations in the world that does not have an “outigration” problem.

      As for a girlfriend, the best way to end up living in a marital nightmare is to get in a hurry. I’ve known some women and I ride a motorcycle and I can tell you that they have two things in common If you get in to much of a hurry (that’s one) or if you do something stupid (that’s two) you’re guaranteed to end up in some state of broken. :)

      Take your time. Remember, nothing that lives remains the same. If it’s not growing, it’s dying, So, grow. Keep your eyes, ears, mind and heart open. When the time is right, be sure you are right, and you’ll do alright.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 3.3/5 (13 votes cast)
    • calizuz1Comment by calizuz1
      January 14, 2013 @ 8:19 pm

      SpecWar4. You are right on the money……..

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.2/5 (5 votes cast)
  13. shafawnComment by shafawn
    January 14, 2013 @ 4:02 pm

    Is there any way to impeach Obama without depending on the Socialist controlled Senate?

    If he can shred laws and pretend he is law maker then why can’t we the people make a new law that says if the senate is as unconstitutional as the president then we can circumvent the senate the way Obama circumvents the House. ???

    Are we going to sit idly by while this man destroys our constitutional rights?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.5/5 (25 votes cast)
    • powertothepeopleComment by powertothepeople
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:09 pm

      We may have to depend on someone in the military saying enough is enough and declare Obozo a criminal and arrest his sorry A** and throw him in chains.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.6/5 (22 votes cast)
  14. bizzybuzzerComment by bizzybuzzer
    January 14, 2013 @ 4:04 pm

    http://www.ehow.com/how_2093097_impeach-president.html

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 3.7/5 (3 votes cast)
  15. powertothepeopleComment by powertothepeople
    January 14, 2013 @ 4:04 pm

    Note that Blu wants to draw you into a discussion about solutions so you feel you are part of the solution and not part of the problem. This is the old perception is reality trick…get the unsuspecting to participate so they do not see the evil behind the reality.

    Obozo is part of the greater movement to eliminate all threats to the liberals, socialists and communists among us.

    I love the threat that mass killings will continue in schools and other places just because the gun exists. But what of the police…shouldn’t they give up their guns if all law abiding citizens are not allowed guns?? Why would they need them? Then should not Obozo give up his security details with their fully automatic weapons?

    If Obozo reaches his hand into the Constitutional water he should be impeached. But, yes, it will not happen as the communists run the Senate. The fuse is burning!

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (17 votes cast)
    • gimmesometruthComment by gimmesometruth
      January 15, 2013 @ 1:23 pm

      I TOTALLY agree! If the State has the right to point their weapons on citizens, be it AR15′s, 9MM Glock’s, water cannons, flash bangs, or LRAD’s, then we have the RIGHT to respond in kind to ensure our ability to be FREE of tyranny of the state.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)
  16. jz16Comment by jz16
    January 14, 2013 @ 4:18 pm

    I think the REAL POINT here is our Three Branches of Government and what each can do according to our Constitution. It seems to me the Excutive Branch is out of control.
    What should be done about guns, needs to be DEBATED in Congress, voted on and sent to the States for Radification. That is what is outlined in our Constitution. You cannot change the Constitution by Excutive Order. Mr. President did you flunk Civics?
    I agree we need to figure out why we have people go nuts and kill with or without guns. Why has it become so common of late? I don’t think a week of hearings is enough time to come up with the answers.
    For you that are anti-guns, this is not the point here can the Excutive Branch overrule the Constitution. We have a system of laws if we ignore them, be careful of what we will become.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.7/5 (15 votes cast)
    • jayelkComment by jayelk
      January 14, 2013 @ 5:21 pm

      Most people forget the initial branch, making it 4 branches of government. The initial branch is ‘We the people’. And the checks and balances between branches has apparently corroded to become useless. I fear what new ‘checks and balances’ may be instituted.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.6/5 (10 votes cast)
  17. timeforjusticeComment by timeforjustice
    January 14, 2013 @ 4:23 pm

    When are the people of this Country going to finally stand up and say NO to all the fundamental rights that are being wiped out even as we speak?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (19 votes cast)
    • catmanComment by catman
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:29 pm

      When the people decide that freedom is more important than free cell phones…

      … and grow some *****!

      But with bottom feeding Harry Reid in the senate, it’s not gonna happen!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (15 votes cast)
  18. jayelkComment by jayelk
    January 14, 2013 @ 4:24 pm

    The death of innocents is always horrendous.

    What I find repulsive, is some people’s ability to select when to be outraged, to feign emotion only when it fits their desires.

    According to the FBI Uniform Crime Report, between 2006 and 2010 47,856 people were murdered in the U.S. by firearms, or around 10,000 murders per year. That is horrible and yes, those criminals should be incarcerated, and most likely were.

    According to the US Census Bureau, an average of about 1,230,000 American citizens are murdered EVERY YEAR between 2004 and 2008, by abortions. Even if we remove the 191,670 rapes reported (2005 stats), that leaves over 1 MILLION murdered.

    So, on an annual basis, American citizens have been murdered roughly 100 times more with ‘scalpels’ than with guns.
    And I’ll bet you can count the number of those abortionists that have been incarcerated pretty quickly. Not a single one.

    Where is the outrage? Where is the media coverage?
    Perhaps we need genital-control instead of gun-control? (sarcasm – I’m against government ‘controls’ and all for self-control.)

    The hypocrisy of those believing in pro-choice, while believing the death of 28 people in one instance of insanity or 12 in another, is worth eliminating the rights of millions of law abiding American citizens is beyond repugnant. It is so incredibly foul as to taint any who witness it with the perpetual stench of death.

    Pro-choice gun control advocates, may God have mercy on you for your hypocrisy and your self-righteousness, because you know very well that the law abiding citizens whose rights you take away will not be so merciful.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (16 votes cast)
    • shafawnComment by shafawn
      January 14, 2013 @ 4:44 pm

      You need to look at the bigger picture.

      This is a study done by Harvard on the counterproductive result of gun control comparing the United States with the rest of the world.

      The findings of two criminologists – Prof. Don Kates and Prof. Gary Mauser – in their exhaustive study of American and European gun laws and violence rates, are telling:

      Nations with stringent anti-gun laws generally have substantially higher murder rates than those that do not. The study found that the nine European nations with the lowest rates of gun ownership (5,000 or fewer guns per 100,000 population) have a combined murder rate three times higher than that of the nine nations with the highest rates of gun ownership (at least 15,000 guns per 100,000 population).
      http://theacru.org/acru/harvard_study_gun_control_is_counterproductive/

      The United States is number 28 in homicide murders by gun in the world. The top 9 countries with the highest homicide rate DO have gun control policies and some of them are VERY strict gun bans.

      Washington D.C. outlawed hand guns and only then did it go on to produce a homicide rate 8x the national average.

      You really don’t know what you’re talking about.
      You’re just afraid of guns.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (15 votes cast)
  19. hoosier46Comment by hoosier46
    January 14, 2013 @ 4:39 pm

    Somehow, I doubt that I am the only person who sees more than just a little hypocrisy in what Obama is trying to do. The administration that intentionally sold over 2,000 guns, mostly fitting their definition of assault weapons, to criminals, now wants to increase restrictions on gun ownership by civilians with no criminal history. Looking at this logically one could easily surmise that the only ones they want to own guns are the criminals. Any such proposal should be the laughing stock of the media and comics everwhere.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.7/5 (14 votes cast)
  20. Pingback: I’ll take the guns and your mama’s SS check, and your uncle’s Veteran’s check and… « servehiminthewaiting

  21. brucedeitrickpriceComment by brucedeitrickprice
    January 14, 2013 @ 5:07 pm

    Every time I look, there are more problems with the official version of Sandy Hook.

    Anyone not following this story would be stunned by the apparent fraud.

    I urge everyone to take an interest in determining what, in fact, actually happened that day.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.6/5 (9 votes cast)
  22. GOProudComment by GOProud
    January 14, 2013 @ 5:17 pm

    Whether it’s Gun-Control, Raising the Debt Ceiling, Sandy Relief, or the Budget, we conservatives and supporters of the Constitution have our work cut out for us since the liberals and progressives have hijacked this Republic. They control the network TV news, major newspapers and media outlets, therefore the mush-for-brains citizens of our country only get one side of the story, right out of the Marxist playbook. We’ve got to be more pro-active in society and politics, and keep relentlessly coming at them with the truth, that conservatism( small Govt. ), Free Market, and Capitalism is what has made the country great and why we were called the Bread-Basket of the World, and hope it eventually sinks in. If not, America will no longer recover it’s greatness, it’ll be just another seat at the world table.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (9 votes cast)
    • introspector7Comment by introspector7
      January 14, 2013 @ 5:46 pm

      Replace the “o” with an “a” and drop the “k”.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  23. introspector7Comment by introspector7
    January 14, 2013 @ 5:40 pm

    Any type of gun registration is an infringement of the right to keep and bear arms. You cannot very well put down a tyrannical government and exorcise your Jeffersonian duty when they know who the gun owners are. They’ll just come for your guns and they won’t bother to knock. A criminal will get their guns by breaking into the homes of gun owners that have been outed by the various Marxist News outlets. They will wait until you’re not home and gain entry and do their thing. As for back ground checks, do away with them and replace it with a legal I D or on your drivers license just put Felon below the i d # . No i d or Felon can’t buy. If you’re mentally unstable or severe Parkinsons or some other disability that would make it unsafe for you to discharge a firearm simply have an ineligible for firearms ownership criteria so as not to stigmatize the individual.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)
    • calizuz1Comment by calizuz1
      January 14, 2013 @ 8:23 pm

      Soooooo, true.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  24. Ray RobinsonComment by Ray Robinson
    January 14, 2013 @ 6:13 pm

    The policies that should be looked at first are the ones dealing with mental health. Reporting by health care providers to the proper agency, probably the BATFE, patients who should not be allowed to own firearms would do more to prevent tragedys than symbolic laws written by gun haters that do not understand the subject. No this would not prevent all tragedys but it would be a start. A gun by itself is harmless. A gun in the hands of an insane person is a deadly mistake. Please pardon any spelling errors. My spellcheck is not working.

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.0/5 (4 votes cast)
  25. Michael BrittinghamComment by Michael Brittingham
    January 14, 2013 @ 6:24 pm

    WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO NOT issue any Presidential Orders to address the USA gun violence problems that may infringe on the powers of Congress. Based on the belief that a President who abuses his executive order authority undermines the constitutional separation of powers and may even violate it, and that there are serious constitutional and other problems in the broad assertion of any assumed ‘Presidential power to govern by decree’, that in fact, may infringe on the powers and duties of Congress; we the people, therefore call upon President Obama and the Obama Administration; NOT to issue ANY ‘Presidential Orders’ and/or ‘Decrees’ regarding the issues of ‘gun control’, and to carefully weigh its legal options, and potential political fall-out concerns, along with its own policy objectives, in order to find the right solutions for dealing effectively with each opportunity to address the multi-faceted gun violence problem in America.

    “There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person.”
    - Charles-Louis de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu

    You can sign and then forward this URL to others to help promote this petition.https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/not-issue-any-presidential-orders-address-usa-gun-violence-problems-may-infringe-powers-congress/HsywS70w

    VA:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.4/5 (7 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





  • "The churches today are just another business. And these are good measures of the success of a business. ..." Comment by Bobinms
    Posted in Barna: Many pastors wary of raising 'controversy'
  • "This says it all Kremlin's Obama Tweet Puts His Poodle Up Against Putin's Leopard http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/kremlin-obama-tweet-poodle/2014/08/01/id/586327/?ns_mail_uid=78955430&ns_mail_job=1579896_08012014&s=al&dkt_nbr=orbiuzn4" Comment by genesal
    Posted in With friends like these....
  • "Speaking to a reality condition of far too many churches ... they have a board of directors or deacons or..." Comment by rustypat
    Posted in Barna: Many pastors wary of raising 'controversy'

Fresh Ink Archives

  • August 2014
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • Reference Pages

  • About
  • Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer