POLL: If the presidential election was today I would vote for........

[Terri]

You must be registered and logged in to vote.

You're welcome to post and share why you voted as you did.

[Terri]

bump

[rfurtkamp]

Bush, no questions asked.

[2True]

Doesn't matter. The top two (Dem and Bush) act like free-spending Liberals.

[BIG CASINO]

Tis very sad that 2TRUE seems not to understand the difference between Republicans and Democrats (he says "dosn't make any difference").

Among the most important differences is that Republicans anster to God, while Democrats answer to man!


Paddle Foreward, Kids

[KatyJ]

George W. Bush all the way! *This country needs this President more than ever. *He has handled foreign policy extremely well, especially The War on Terror. *The economy is on an upswing. * The unemployment numbers are on a decrease. *

I simply don't trust any of the nine candidates running for President. *They'll do what Clinton did in office nothing. * http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag4.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/star2.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag19.gif

BUSH-CHENEY '04

[Cirbuck]

Well I don't agree with those that say it is a choice of the lesser of two or three evils this time. *I think that George Bush has proven himself to be not only a good leader with integrity but largely has done the best that could be done within the confines of such a morally and fiscally bankrupt system. *No man can be elected president and with a wave of some magic hocus pocus fix all the ills of our federal government according to what we more conservative thinking populace would want. *I disagree with a lot of his softness on immigration and other issues but then he is making more decisions that make sense to me than not. *And, in light of what he has had to deal with in the eruption of this new war we are fighting, he has held fast to the integrity of his convictions and fought a good fight. *Beyond that, I know personally he is a man of serious moral and religious conviction and as I have said before that is one of the most important criteria for me. *I certainly hope that he wins out of all the possible alternatives present. http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/usflag22.gif

[Floridaguy]

Big Casino, good to see you again. I missed the "paddle forward kids" tagline. *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif *Bush is our best candidate for 2004. But hey, now is a great time to think of an electable conservative candidate for 2008.... presumably one who can/will beat the *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/broomstick.gif .

http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag19.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rwbelephant.gif

[anamericanpatriot]

*http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/cool.gif President Bush has proven himself up to the job of keeping America free and strong. *He had barely warmed his seat in the Oval Office and 9/11/01 occurred. *From then on he NEVER "lost control!" *Instead, he answered the call, united America, fueled patriotism and put the world on notice to "Not tread on the USA!" *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/unclesam.gif http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/clap.gif http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/elefant.gif

In today's world, Bush has NO ONE qualified to take his place as the President--and that includes those who have their blinders on and are looking at Hillary! *The hate emanating from the Democrats is so intense against Bush, the Republican Party and our great country, that it can only find its source in the Evil one--the Devil! *I'm praying for the Democratic Party and have even told them to "get rid of the hate" and "dispose of their trashy agenda." *Whether they listen, or not, is their choice but without "getting back to the things that made and keeps America strong," their current efforts will bury their party...much like our stance against Communist Russia resulted in her breakdown of the "Iron Curtain" and the Berlin Wall.

http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flagsalute.gif http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/happydance.gif GOD BLESS AMERICA! *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/gopusa.gif BUSH-CHENEY IN 2004! *There is no other choice for a strong, free America! *Pray for the Peace of Jerusalem! http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/elefant.gif http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/usa.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag19.gif

[azwhitewolf]

I'll do a little GW, and a side of Cheney. *

I'm impressed with his resolve, and his decision to go to war over there despite the cry-baby petroli-oil wearing peaceb*st*rds and their hero, Dennis Kucinich. http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsup.gif

I even like his foreign aid packages and what he did to help stimulate the economy. *And he makes people feel safe. *I like the content of his speeches. *

What chaps my http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/jacka.gif is his refusal to stand up to Mexico's Vicente Fox (who is a self-interest punk), or close the borders and services for illegal aliens. *This issue has been around since I can remember, and it's time someone stood up and took care of it. *Now is the most opportunistic time to do JUST THAT - to avoid scrunity and cries of racism, and follow the law under the realistic guise of security. *

It's my only beef, but a big one. *Nuff said. *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

Nice to see that no-one yet has checked "I won't vote". *That's encouraging.

[eussery1]

http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif can't answer the Poll, not sure whom to vote for. Can't find a conservative in the present candidates from the 2 major parties. http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif
Earl

[pRIMrose]

Of course I will vote for Bush. I wouldn't dream of not voting. How can you possibly criticize who is in office if you don't vote?

However, just because I vote for a man doesn't mean I won't criticize him when I think he is ignoring the platform he ran on. It's mostly Democrats who blindly, like lemmings, follow a leader right over the cliff and never criticize him.

And I certainly won't shoot myself in the foot by wasting my vote on someone who has absolutely no chance whatsoever in getting elected.

Until we can cultivate a "real" conservative it will have to be this way.

[Brenda]

IT HAS TO BE BUSH. *I SEE NO BODY ELSE WITH HIS JUDEAO/CHRISTIAN EHICS,MORALS AND CONVICTIONS.
However I am dissappointed in his statement to Taiwan, and his previous policy of telling Israel "you can't fight your enemies like we will/are fighting ours"".

AND JUST FOR THE RECORD THE "SPENDING" PROBLEM IS IN CONGRESS!!!

ONE OTHER ISSUE: GWB SHOULD DO AND "END RUN" AROUND THE "ILLEGAL TACTICS" OF THE dems TO TIE UP THE JUDICAL NOMINEES, as proven in the "leaked" memo's, AND FILL THE VACANCIES WHILE THE congress IN ON VACATION!!

CONSERVATIVE VALUES AND GODLY PRINCIPALS ARE MY GUIDE LINES FOR VOTING. *HE NEEDS TO STAND UP TO THE "BLACK OLIGARCHY" - BUT, I THINK THAT'S THE JOB OF congress.

AND I WILL ALWAYS ADMIRE HIM FOR HIS SPEECH AT THE "LIGHTING OF THE TREE". *I BET THE aclu GOT ILL.
can the aclu sue the president?

THE ILEGAL ALLIEN ISSUE MUST BE ADDRESSED-THEY ARE SUCKING THE AFFECTED STATES DRY. But in their shoes I would want out too.

BUT THE FEATHER IN HIS CAP FOR ME- HIS CONTINUED STATEMENTS THAT HE RELIES ON GOD FOR GUIDANCE. *MAY HE CONTINUE TO DO SO INSPITE OF THE LIBERALISTIC IDEALS FLYING IN HIS FACE AT EVERY OPPORTUNITY.
I was dissappointed with His statement that allah and the GOD of the Holy Bible are the same, perhaps that's the way Islam started, but it sure took a wrong turn somewhere.

WE NEED BUSH, THEIR IS NO ONE ELSE WORTHY. I WORRY ABOUT 2008, if we are still around.
WITH THE JUDGES MAKING UP LAWS MAYBE HE COULD RUN AGAIN http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif
http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wow.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif

[jackbenimble]

Here is an interesting question for the next poll:

Is President Bush and the Republican Controlled Congress spending money like:

A. A drunken sailor?

B. A slightly enibriated sailor?

C. A sailor that claims to have had only two beers?

D. A sailor on the wagon suffering from the DTs?

Regards,
Jack

[Terri]

I think we'll run this poll and the one we had last week about once a month right up to the election.

It will be interesting to see how the results and the comments change as things progress.

[markinthedark]

Not voting is a vote for the Commiecrat due jure.

[markinthedark]

jackbenimble I take exception to the "Sailor" reference. I was one, and no sailor had access to that much money. The median of the enlisted pay scale per hour is 30% of the minimum wage. Now a pirate after a nice haul..... http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif

[Paleo-Conservative]

I can only vote for a candidate that will uphold the Constitution and as far as I have been able to determine, the only one who espouses that policy is Howard Phillips. Can he win? Extremely unlikely because he is his own man. He is not therefore just another robot under the control of the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderbergers, Tri-lateralists or some combination thereof and that alone, in my opinion, places him well above our current encumbent in terms of honesty and integrity. It also forfeits his support from our CFR controlled media and from most monetary sources, thereby assuring his defeat.

Anyone that has bought into the administration fabrications of WMD, uranium cake from Niger, long range missiles (I think they were 25 miles longer in range than the limit that some bureaucrat had imposed), ties to al-Qaida, etc. is suffering from severe delusions. All those fabrications were transparent almost from the time they were offered but Hitlers old axiom about telling a big enough lie long enough was certainly proved again.

Old Republican promises of smaller government have proved unfounded what with our incredible budget excesses and continued Constitutionally illegitimate agencies such as the Depts of Education or of Agriculture, or of dozens of other agencies. When are we going to trim these illegitimate excesses out of our government? When we get a Republican Congress and President? That used to be the excuse. I am relatively certain that there are no plans in the current administration for any such actions that might help bring us into alignment with Amendment Ten in spite of Republicans galore.

We still have troops over half the face of the globe in spite of the best advice of our founding fathers to mind our own business. And even with our current troop levels, we can't seem to find enough manpower to seal off our borders and keep out literally millions of illegal aliens who are soaking up welfare, education and medical funds and facilities. Perhaps if we had less largesse we wouldn't be bothered by the hordes of illegals from the South (or North either). Anyone seen any legislative action in that direction? I haven't either! When Congressman Tancredo proposed a bill to keep the illegals out, our current incumbent said he'd never sign it. At that point I had to say I could no longer support a President who couldn't or wouldn't honor his oath of office and who is apparently trying to buy illegal votes (what other conclusion can I come to)? Compassion for the poor illegals? How about our own citizens first?

The constant pandering to the UN is another unconstitutional action. What right does either a Republican or Democratic administration have to grant a non-American agency the right to dictate policy regarding our taxes, laws, tariffs, military deployment, education, etc, et.al.

These are only a few very brief reasons why I can no longer vote for controlled candidates from either party who are leading us over the edge of a cliff. Rather to have supported a losing candidate who displays honor and integrity than to forfeit principle and be constantly deceived in the future. In either case, I'm afraid we'll see our country go completely down a sinkhole unless Conservatives can get their act together and eject our blunderer in chief.

[stharrybygrace]

Oh please, I have a choice between George Bush, or a bunch of trolls with all the principles of a rattlesnake?
The answer is plain as day.
BUSH-CHENEY 2004 http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/usflag22.gif

[azwhitewolf]

Quote[/b] ]The constant pandering to the UN is another unconstitutional action. *What right does either a Republican or Democratic administration have to grant a non-American agency the right to dictate policy regarding our taxes, laws, tariffs, military deployment, education, etc, et.al. *

PC, I could in no way be mistaken for Bush's biggest fan. *

However, while I agree with you on the immigration issue (which I'm holding out hope that Bush's second term will issue different results), I have to DISAGREE that Bush is a UN puppet. *He stood up and against the world leadership to do what we're doing now. *

The UN wouldn't force Saddam to open up his palaces. *The UN made laws they wouldn't enforce. *And for our safety, we went over and did a little looking ourselves. Against the UN. *Against the liberals, and the peace asshats that screamed bloody murder that we were being "bullies". *

Personally, I think the UN will attempt to dictate globalization. *And from what I believe, I'm not ready for a NWO. *Anyone who stands WITH his convictions, especially AGAINST the UN is someone who at least displays character. *I can't trust a liberal to follow their true convictions. *They have none except what is pleasing for the day.

I don't think our founding fathers would have done it differently.
Quote[/b] ]Anyone that has bought into the administration fabrications of WMD, uranium cake from Niger, long range missiles (I think they were 25 miles longer in range than the limit that some bureaucrat had imposed), ties to al-Qaida, etc. is suffering from severe delusions.
Yeah, we were "in it for the oil", right? *Or did we just go too long without a war? *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/laugh.gif *Saddam really WAS our friend, wasn't he?

FWIW, I checked out the Howard Phillips webpage, and he seems like my kind of guy. http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsup.gif But I also think you're right. He has no chance, though I wish he did.

[Commodore Barrett]

Although my options remain open for 2008 (if we are still around -- Meteor Crater, AZ, still remains a little unsettling for me) I remain committed to GW unless something happens to him -- God forbid!)

Right now, though, GW needs to consider grooming his successor from among several candidates. I'd like to see Colin Powell make the attempt, but I remember what had happened to Mr. Justice Thomas. So I agree with Mrs. Colin Powell, and hope that the General agrees to write his memoirs of his years in the Army and in the State Department. *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif

The questions still remain: With which candidate can we defeat Hillary? Can the GOP retain control of the Congress and
add to its majority sufficient Senators to beat back a Dem filibuster? And so forth.

Including a policy address from GW which will symbolize the ancient dream -- to establish a community independent of Earth on another body within our Solar System. Fox had in its pre-Super Bowl XXXIII hype a tribute to Lincoln: The Lincoln Tapestry. Written by Aaron Copeland and still available through the Public Radio Music Service (I leave the All Things Considered off the air; during that time of day, I prefer Hannity), the Fox had the living former Presidents narrating part of the Tapestry. Yes, Fox included Reagan's pre recorded voice off camera. And the video included a scene which I remember fondly -- from the ruins of Ground Zero to the skies. My largest regret is that the Lunar Community wasn't running at the time; the Stars and Stripes unfurled at Mount Malapart would be the ultimate response against terrorism of whatever kidney.

MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!

[NWGOPMom]

Definitely Bush. While I have problems with his immigration policy (or lack thereof) and a few other things, I would still put my vote solidly behind him.

[Billary2004]

I will happily vote for Bush. Yes, his fiscal views and social ideas are far from conservative, but I BELIEVE that he has it in him and the Republican Party has it in itself to come together to produce more conservative goals that will lead us into another 8 years of Republican success (can you say Condi Rice-our next Pres!)
Illegals in this country, the growing entitlement intrusion, taxes......the list of things to fix goes on, but this is all moot if we don't have a country to fix. Fatalistic (realistic) as it might be, China and Russia still hold pose an enormous and real threat to our country and way of life. There is no doubt that the 2 countries were/are funding and promoting the first wave of attacks set to destroy this our country. Bush has excelled at defending our country since 9-11 and made the genius move to not only punish Saddam and his cronies, but work to set up a democracy, which will hopefully have a domino effect throughout that region and show the world that people can live freely, despite unbelieveable odds. Bush has taken the firsts steps in mounting an offense to defeat the post cold world "enemy" and lead the world to a safer and more democratic way of life.

[2True]

Quote[/b] (Billary2004 @ Dec. 17, 2003 -- 3:30 pm)]Illegals in this country, the growing entitlement intrusion, taxes......the list of things to fix goes on, but this is all moot if we don't have a country to fix.
Doesn't much matter what external threats we stop when our country is being sold out from under us.

I know when I joined the GOP it was not to:
* Give amnesty as a reward to criminals who ignore our
laws, drive down wages, and endanger my kids by
bankrupting the local ER/Hospital,
* Create the largest Socialist handout in US history,
* Ignore open meetings/FOIA laws,
* Create a massive budget deficit (even when war costs
are factored out.),
* Hand over immigration authority/policy to Chile and Singapore
without recourse,
* And the list goes on....

My money and vote won't be used to support that.

And I won't fall for the "vote for us or you're helping the boogie man" red herring, either.

Either the GOP stands for the needs of Americans or it is irrelevant. Given the legislative record of the last three years, the current GOP is largely irrelevant to the Citizens of the United States. And the Bush Administration is the director of this tragedy in the making.

[TeresaVa]

anamericanpatriot
* Said it best. *

*I can not and do not want to imagine anyone else who could do the job better, or with more heart than our honorable President Bush.
Knowing Bush is in office is the only reason I can sleep at night since 9/11

* I am sure he will be win hands down over whomever gets the nomination for the Democrat party or what I refer to them as the "Helen Keller" party, but will be scared to death once 2008 rolls around.

TeresaVA

[Terri]

Hi Teresa! Welcome to the forum!

[conn.servative]

while the fiscal policy leaves a lot to be desired, it wouldn't get any better, and would only get worse by voting for a democrat. but tops on my list is national security, and if dean were to be elected our military would all have blue helmets, and never succeed at anything. kerry would send our troops in only with the un's permission, then when the troops got back he'd tell them to pretend to throw away their medals so they can be cool too. kucinich would be so giddy that he wouldn't know what to do. mosely-braun would make women's votes worth 2 from now on. gephardt would see to it that union's were more powerful then congress. sharpton, would have his criminal record expunged. edwards would be like a mini-gore, he could walk into a room full of people, everyone would recognize his face, but noone could put a name to it. Nader would move to abolish both parties, and institue the "green american party" where we all have the same ideals.

of course i'm voting for Bush, i've already signed up to be a team leader to recruit

[Thomas602]

Quote[/b] (Thomas602 @ Dec. 20, 2003 -- 4:15 pm)]Quote[/b] (Floridaguy @ Dec. 11, 2003 -- 9:27 pm)]Big Casino, good to see you again. I missed the "paddle forward kids" tagline. *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif *Bush is our best candidate for 2004. But hey, now is a great time to think of an electable conservative candidate for 2008.... presumably one who can/will beat the *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/broomstick.gif .

http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag19.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rwbelephant.gif
Gee, I wonder what the 'witch' icon stands for? Do I get 3 guesses and the first 2, don't count? Could it be the Jr. Senator from New York? Did I get it right...huh?? http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif
All kidding aside...George W. Bush is a man of serious conviction, and morality. He is Level-Headed, and considers
the good of ALL in this country, when he makes a decision.
Make no mistake. He weathers criticism well, and is undaunted by it. Certainly there are things that could be done better, but considering the mess that this country is in,not to mention this PLANET(?), who would you trust? Certainly not any of the people running on the Democrat ticket? All they can be is NEGATIVE. THAT, my friends is NOT what WE NEED in this time of tummault and kaos. George W. Bush is the RIGHT man, at the RIGHT TIME! GOD BLESS HIM, OUR TROOPS, AND THE U.S.A.!! Thanks for your attention...

[Nanasay]

Since I have no other choice.. I vote for Bush..

But, AZWW and I agree.. His pandering to Mexico is going to get his butt kicked.. If he doesn't listen, he's going to have a very close race as 85% of America want the illegals OUT! We want our taxpayer services for Americans.. And giving illegals driver's licenses will encourage the Dim to use them to VOTE..

Being a team leader also, I have made these views known.. I think that Bush is listening as, lately, he appears to be backing down..

My family will also being voting for Bush..

[KatyJ]

I'd have to agree with you on your point. Although, I'll be supporting and voting for Bush. He needs to drop supporting Mexico, especially on the illegal immigrant issue.

[Terri]

This president is a leader and he is changing the political layout of the world. I think this is the most pressing issue of our time and I simply cannot imagine abandoning it in midstream.

The Middle East is changing before our eyes and the next five years are going to be very interesting if Bush is reelected and can continue to exercise his brand of foreign policy.

[Tom Tancredo 2004]

I have no choice, but to vote for Bush in 04. His position on immigration, especially illegal immigration, is dead wrong and if he's acting like this on his second term, then our country will go down the drain permanently.

I could vote for a third party candidate, but there isn't anyone who is strong enough to attract voters from the GOP and Democrats. They have ideas, but no money or recognition to win elections.

Reelect Bush and elect Tancredo for President in 2008. I have a gut feeling Rep. Tancredo will declare his presidency before the GOP presidential primary in 08. He's got the brains, name recognition and his patriotism attracted Americans from all walks of life.

Together, we must ask Bush really tough questions on illegal immigration and there's gotta be large enough crowds at every place Bush stops at to give him an earful. Otherwise, he doesn't know what most Americans want.

We need to raise a lot of noise on the immigration issue so Bush would change his stance on Mexico and illegal aliens. If he listens and take firm on this issue, then Bush will win in a landslide!

BUSH FOR PRESIDENT IN 04 & TANCREDO FOR PRESIDENT IN 08!

[Floridaguy]

Hey, if Tancredo is running in 2008, I would support him over just about any other candidate I can think of. I hope he does run. http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsup.gif

http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag19.gif http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/cowboy7.gif

[Tom Tancredo 2004]

Quote[/b] (Floridaguy @ Dec. 23, 2003 -- 5:37 am)]Hey, if Tancredo is running in 2008, I would support him over just about any other candidate I can think of. I hope he does run. *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsup.gif

http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag19.gif *http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/cowboy7.gif
Hi Floridaguy or Rory! http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/smile.gif

That's a possibility that is coming out of my heart and I bet many other people feel the same way about his future chances for running the Presidency.

The next Republican Presidential primary is a long ways away and a lot can change from now until 2008. By then, Tancredo will more be experience and his name will be recognize in all 50 states by 2008.

Who knows? We should pray to God everyday that we need a man like Tancredo to run in 2008. America needs to return back to its Judeo-Christian heritage and stop relying on worldly things. God, Family and Country!

<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:purple' >TANCREDO FOR PRESIDENT IN 2008!</span></span> http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsup.gif

[KatyJ]

In 2008, I would like for Condolezza Rice to run for President. I think she could beat Hillary Clinton hands down because she's so smart and intellgent.

http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/star2.gif http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/usflag22.gif

[alsopls]

My vote George Bush! I screwed up in 1976 and voted for Jimmy (I really don't like Americans) Carter. I was upset at some of Ford's policies and mistakenly believed a Georgia democrat would be good for our Country OY VEY http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/sad.gif
p