PDA

View Full Version : Several states move to cancel primaries


lpara
11-11-2003, 12:24 AM
<span style='font-family:verdana'>Several states move to cancel primaries

* *ASSOCIATED PRESS
* *Several states have moved to drop their presidential primaries next year, worried about costs in tight financial times and wondering if the political exercise would serve any purpose.
* *Some say they can't afford the millions of dollars it costs to hold an election. Others say the decisions reflect the lopsided nature of modern primaries: The front-runner gets anointed by the press and campaign donors after the first few state primaries and the rest of the primaries are formalities.
* *The decisions add fuel to the argument that the primary system is in dire need of repair. In most states forgoing a primary, party-run caucuses will be used instead to choose delegates to the national conventions.
* *&quot;Fewer voters will participate because [caucuses] are more complex,&quot; said Curtis Gans, director of the Committee for the Study of the American Electorate. State politicians are freezing out average voters, he said, because caucuses bring &quot;lower turnout, and more advantage to whoever's organized.&quot;

Some Democrats complain that cutting primaries hurts their party (http://www.washtimes.com/national/20031109-114400-4808r.htm) http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin2.gif</span>

Floridaguy
11-11-2003, 08:58 PM
I would love it if there were no Dem primary here. http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/cool.gif

http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/cowboy7.gif

markinthedark
11-16-2003, 11:41 PM
The Primary system is not winner take all. In most states that is. The candidate votes are translated to delegates in the convention. That doesn't mean delegates can't be stolen, bought, traded, coerced, ect.
This may happen if no candidate can achieve critical mass. Strong candidates don't have to much to worry about, but a close race or a multiple split race can get this messy. This will be The B*tch's entree into the race.
Even though she swears up and down she is not running, expirance teaches to NEVER BELIEVE A WORD SHE OR ANY OF THE REST OF HER CREW SAY WITHOUT INDEPENDANT VERIFICATION.
Reagan used this policy with good effect on commies in the eighties, it is still vallid today. http://www.gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/usflag22.gif

Commodore Barrett
11-21-2003, 05:39 PM
Again, I refer all to the Waiting for Hillary thread. We all know that she is waiting for the first ballot to show there is only a plurality of delegates for any given candidate, and not a clear-cut majority. So, once the first ballot is taken, and there is no majority vote, look for Hillary to be taken as &quot;the greatest thing since sliced bread.&quot;

And then watch the major media do everything they can to promote Hillary and demonize George -- like they did his father back in 1992 when Perot canceled his run.