Looking Back ~ Criticism of Republicans

[McGrats]

As Eberly indicated, the 'pubs lost a ton of credibility with their excessive spending under Hastert and Company. Sadly, getting back your credibility is like putting toothpaste back in the tube.

And since we have a "Lamestream Media" intent on placing liberals back in the WH, it makes the job even more difficult.

Thanks Mr. Hastert! And thank you Mr. Bush for not using your veto pen when necessary.

Oh well, it won't be too many more days till a new Presidency.

:(

[Terri]

Oh well, it won't be too many more days till a new Presidency.
Yep, here comes Hillary to sign Rangel's tax plan.

I couldn't help but notice that you had nothing at all to say against it, McGrats.

[McGrats]

I couldn't help but notice that you had nothing at all to say against it, McGrats.

I didn't have to. When garbage smells, everyone knows it.

:D

[Terri]

I didn't have to. When garbage smells, everyone knows it.
Unfortunately, they do not.

The average voter doesn't take the time to understand tax policies.

They are happy to settle for taxing others more in order to give them handouts.

Articles like Bobby's are needed to help people understand Rangel's policies.

[florida]

Thank you GWB and Republican Majority Congress for Letting the American People Down on Pork Barrel Spending. If the Dems take the White House in 2008, GWB and the Boys are to blame.........God Help Us All!!!

Thompson 2008

[Terri]

I've moved these posts to Rants because they are not on topic in the thread about Rangel's proposed tax increase.

The Republicans made mistakes and they earned criticism for it.

Please use this thread to continue beating the dead horse while the rest of us talk about the future of tax reform under Democrats in the thread provided for THAT topic.

[greg]

I've moved these posts to Rants because they are not on topic in the thread about Rangel's proposed tax increase.Ooops, Terri, you caught me mid penning! What do I do?

I didn't have to. When garbage smells, everyone knows it.McGrats, Terri has a salient point here. It's best to pen at least a one liner 'spell-it-out,' if not for some of us economic 'average voters' like me, then to add to our conservative encouragement by telling us all where you explicitly stand and why (to give us lesser economically-endowed argument armaments).

On point,
For those of you wondering what the details of taxing the rich to pay for Democratic spending proposals might look like, Rangel, a close ally of Hillary Clinton, has provided a tour of the abyss.Terri and other economically versed, correct me if I'm wrong, but the basic Democratic definition of "rich" is anyone NOT on their LBJ welfare program. (LBJ=President Lyndon Baines Johnson [D], of that welfare 'Great Society' fame.)

The NTU goes on to say that small business would be forced to pay higher self-employment taxes.And it's the small businesses which provide the overwhelming majority of American employment. Rangel's eventual end goal appears to be the destruction of American small business.

So while jacking up tax rates, Mr. Rangel has also found a backdoor way to phase down the number of itemized deductions taxpayers can take. Perhaps Mr. Rangel can explain what he has against charitable contributions; or the deduction for state and local taxes; or the home mortgage deduction at a time when the housing industry is reeling.End goal: make Americans subvert their carrying their own burdens by forceably shifting that over to a 'government' who will just increase Uncle Sam's Plantation (by Star Parker).

Can someone please tell me what the phrase "working families" means???Of course, the liberal Democrats like Rangel won't define their terms. They work off of emotional subversion, studiously ignorning the conservative counter point with their liberal MSM, hoping to stampede the American electorate towards their camp. We conservatives need to watch these liberal word tactics.

The more Rangel talks, the more it helps Republicans.Only if the Republican hirelings take note and get their message out, like how Dr. Eberle is also doing.
Let's hope America is listening.And those of us who are listening can join in to goose our hirelings in Congress regardless of their political leanings, as well as talk it up with our other fellow Americans. If our hirelings already know, then support them in their conservatism, or courteously let them have the fire of conservative feedback accountability in their liberalism.

This is yet another reason in the almost unending strings of reasons why the liberal Democrats MUST NOT take the Presidency, and why they must be taken out of Congressional control.

And most important of all, for us individual and aggregate conservative citizens of all conservative stripes hold our Congressional hirelings to the fire of our feedback accountability. Our conservative citizenship lifestyle. Remember the shamnesty Three? Latest attempt being the Dirt Bin wetDREAM Act last week.

[Terri]

Greg, I think most of your post belongs in the Rangel thread and would be informative there to those who are interested in what may take place in the future.

[greg]

Terri, done, as http://www.gopusa.com/forum/showthread.php?p=404 423&posted=1#post404423! Feel free to remove this reply posting #9. Thanks!