PDA

View Full Version : Rockefeller: Bush Duped Public On Iraq


qrayjack
09-10-2006, 10:02 AM
Rockefeller: Bush Duped Public On Iraq
Senator Says World Would Be Better Without Iraq Invasion

(CBS News) WASHINGTON When the Senate Intelligence Committee released a declassified version of its findings this past week, the Republican chairman of the committee, Pat Roberts, left town without doing interviews, calling the report a rehash of unfounded partisan allegations.

Its statements like this one, made Feb. 5, 2003, by then-Secretary of State Colin Powell that have become so controversial, implying Iraq was linked to terror attacks.

"Iraq today harbors a deadly terrorist network headed by abu Musab al-Zarqawi, an associated collaborator of Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda lieutenants," Powell said.

But after 2 1/2 years of reviewing pre-war intelligence behind closed doors, the lead Democrat on the Intelligence Committee, Sen. John Rockefeller (D-W. Va.), who voted for the Iraq War, says the Bush administration pulled the wool over everyone's eyes.
MORE (http://wcbstv.com/topstories/topstories_story_252 203351.html)

Rockefeller went a step further. He says the world would be better off today if the United States had never invaded Iraq — even if it means Saddam Hussein would still be running Iraq.

All the Kurds and other political opposition to Saddam who were tortured, murdered and exterminated probably wouldn't agree with Sen. Rockefeller, and America and other free peoples would be under attack from terrorist groups based in Iraq.

Amawalk John
09-10-2006, 11:02 AM
I've been wondering since last June when we would next hear from the West Virginian mole, Senator Jay Rockefeller, treasonous leaker of US military strategies and secrets to middle eastern towelhead regimes, Big Oil trust fund baby, and all-around liberal moonbat.

OK, senator, you've read your talking points. Now go back in your hole.

qrayjack
09-10-2006, 11:27 AM
The barbershop quartet from hell: Rockefeller, Kennedy, Kerry and Murtha.

rangerrebew
09-10-2006, 01:32 PM
I guess JR was too stupid and incompetent to realize the President's "bad" intelligence was significantly different from the senate's "good" intelligence. :rolleyes: I would never suggest that JR is the raising the issue 2 months before the mid-term elections for political reasons. :moonbat1: As a US Senator and a member of a prestigious American family, I would be an awful person to suggest that he would put party ahead of honesty, integrity, and country. :barf:

84rules
09-11-2006, 09:42 AM
And if, as the Democrats claim, Bush was so stupid, how stupid did the Dems have to be to be duped by him?