jackbenimble
01-31-2005, 10:18 AM
<table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr class="standard"><td>Quote </td></tr><tr class="standard"><td class="QUOTE"> Rush for the Border (http://www.opinionjournal.c om/diary/?id=110006230)
Limbaugh issues a warning to President Bush.
Monday, January 31, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST
ORLANDO, Fla.--In the aftermath of 9/11, conservatives bottled up their frustrations over some of President Bush's policies. Then they muted their criticism during the presidential campaign. But now it is spilling out in all directions--and the White House had better pay attention.
On Friday Rush Limbaugh, a staunch Bush supporter, took two separate opportunities to warn the president that he faced conservative opposition on some key issues that could hurt his chances of passing the rest of his second-term agenda. First was federal spending, which "is surging out of control," according to the Heritage Foundation's new "Mandate for Leadership." The other was immigration, which, Mr. Limbaugh told his listeners, "could break up the Republican-conservative coalition" à la Ross Perot. "We cannot maintain our sovereignty without securing and protecting our borders in an era where terrorists around the world seek entry to this country," he said.
[/QUOTE]
And here is a little more quoting Ken Kobylt of the Ken and John show that got the "FireDreier Campaign" rolling in SoCal.
<table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr class="standard"><td>Quote </td></tr><tr class="standard"><td class="QUOTE">Mr. Kobylt says talk radio has tasted blood on the immigration issue and he expects other hosts around the country to now pick up on the issue. "Republicans are in bed with businesses who like low labor costs, and Democrats have this socialist bent," he says. "But the taxpayers in this country cannot be responsible for a corrupt, bankrupt country like Mexico. We should start throwing employers in jail, a few fat rich white guys in prison."
[/QUOTE]
It is really interesting to see this article in the Wall Street Journal. For pretty much two decades the WSJ has pushed for and promoted a 5-word constitutional amendment: "There shall be open borders". This article does not really reflect a huge shift from that philosophy but it does recognize that the public is getting increasingly angry and that if they government doesn't start establishing some enforcement credentials they are likely to end up with a backlash and some fat rich guys in jail.
It is equally interesting to see Rush Limbaugh get off the fence on this issue. I enjoy Rush's show and listen to at least part (often only a few minutes) of it a couple of times per week. In over a decade, I have almost never heard Rush talk about illegal immigration. But several times lately I heard him launch into a minor tirade on the subject and once he devoted a significant part of his show to the topic.
Sean Hannity, who normally has his face wedged firmly between President Bush's buttocks, has been even more vocal. Again, I only listen to his show occassionally but almost everytime I do he spends a little time criticising the Bush Shamnesty. It seems to be making it onto his TV show about once per week too.
Radio Talk Show Hosts are all about ratings and they are starting to figure out that the illegal immigration issue resonates with conservatives. And it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; the more they talk, the madder people get and the more it resonates and drives ratings which causes them to talk more.
I think it is a good thing.
Regards,
Jack
Limbaugh issues a warning to President Bush.
Monday, January 31, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST
ORLANDO, Fla.--In the aftermath of 9/11, conservatives bottled up their frustrations over some of President Bush's policies. Then they muted their criticism during the presidential campaign. But now it is spilling out in all directions--and the White House had better pay attention.
On Friday Rush Limbaugh, a staunch Bush supporter, took two separate opportunities to warn the president that he faced conservative opposition on some key issues that could hurt his chances of passing the rest of his second-term agenda. First was federal spending, which "is surging out of control," according to the Heritage Foundation's new "Mandate for Leadership." The other was immigration, which, Mr. Limbaugh told his listeners, "could break up the Republican-conservative coalition" à la Ross Perot. "We cannot maintain our sovereignty without securing and protecting our borders in an era where terrorists around the world seek entry to this country," he said.
[/QUOTE]
And here is a little more quoting Ken Kobylt of the Ken and John show that got the "FireDreier Campaign" rolling in SoCal.
<table border="0" align="center" width="95%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tr class="standard"><td>Quote </td></tr><tr class="standard"><td class="QUOTE">Mr. Kobylt says talk radio has tasted blood on the immigration issue and he expects other hosts around the country to now pick up on the issue. "Republicans are in bed with businesses who like low labor costs, and Democrats have this socialist bent," he says. "But the taxpayers in this country cannot be responsible for a corrupt, bankrupt country like Mexico. We should start throwing employers in jail, a few fat rich white guys in prison."
[/QUOTE]
It is really interesting to see this article in the Wall Street Journal. For pretty much two decades the WSJ has pushed for and promoted a 5-word constitutional amendment: "There shall be open borders". This article does not really reflect a huge shift from that philosophy but it does recognize that the public is getting increasingly angry and that if they government doesn't start establishing some enforcement credentials they are likely to end up with a backlash and some fat rich guys in jail.
It is equally interesting to see Rush Limbaugh get off the fence on this issue. I enjoy Rush's show and listen to at least part (often only a few minutes) of it a couple of times per week. In over a decade, I have almost never heard Rush talk about illegal immigration. But several times lately I heard him launch into a minor tirade on the subject and once he devoted a significant part of his show to the topic.
Sean Hannity, who normally has his face wedged firmly between President Bush's buttocks, has been even more vocal. Again, I only listen to his show occassionally but almost everytime I do he spends a little time criticising the Bush Shamnesty. It seems to be making it onto his TV show about once per week too.
Radio Talk Show Hosts are all about ratings and they are starting to figure out that the illegal immigration issue resonates with conservatives. And it becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; the more they talk, the madder people get and the more it resonates and drives ratings which causes them to talk more.
I think it is a good thing.
Regards,
Jack