PDA

View Full Version : A Letter To Michael Moore


jonalvy44
03-20-2003, 06:42 AM
Michael Moore:

Get a CLUE!! Over 70% of the American population support our president!! Your self-loathing anti-Americanism doesn't wash here...You've been exposed for what you are, a big fat America hater. You have now joined the Tom D******* camp of silly little (well, not so little in your case) men who have become politically irrelevent. Hopefully one day you will learn the lesson that Saddam Hussein and the terrorists of the world are on the verge of learning...DON'T MESS WITH AMERICA!

Full of contempt for you and what you stand for,


Jon Alvarez
Syracuse, NY
Why we fight:
http://home.attbi.com/~sept11/
In Our Name- Pledge of Support to President Bush
http://inourname.insignific antthoughts.com/
Visit Alvy's forum: http://groups.msn.com/AlvysForum

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------

Your incredibly stupid letter below:

A Letter to George W. Bush on the Eve of War
By Michael Moore, MichaelMoore.com
March 17, 2003

George W. Bush
1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Washington, DC


Dear Governor Bush:


So today is what you call "the moment of truth," the day that "France and the rest of world have to show their cards on the table." I'm glad to hear that this day has finally arrived. Because, I gotta tell ya, having survived 440 days of your lying and conniving, I wasn't sure if I could take much more. So I'm glad to hear that today is Truth Day, 'cause I got a few truths I would like to share with you:


1. There is virtually no one in America (talk radio nutters and Fox News aside) who is gung-ho to go to war. Trust me on this one. Walk out of the White House and on to any street in America and try to find five people who are passionate about wanting to kill Iraqis. You won't find them! Why? 'Cause no Iraqis have ever come here and killed any of us! No Iraqi has even threatened to do that. You see, this is how we average Americans think: If a certain so-and-so is not perceived as a threat to our lives, then, believe it or not, we don't want to kill him! Funny how that works!


2. The majority of Americans – the ones who never elected you – are not fooled by your weapons of mass distraction. We know what the real issues are that affect our daily lives – and none of them begin with I or end in Q. Here's what threatens us: Two and a half million jobs lost since you took office, the stock market having become a cruel joke, no one knowing if their retirement funds are going to be there, gas now costs almost two dollars – the list goes on and on. Bombing Iraq will not make any of this go away. Only you need to go away for things to improve.


3. As Bill Maher said last week, how bad do you have to suck to lose a popularity contest with Saddam Hussein? The whole world is against you, Mr. Bush. Count your fellow Americans among them.


4. The Pope has said this war is wrong, that it is a Sin. The Pope! But even worse, the Dixie Chicks have now come out against you! How bad does it have to get before you realize that you are an army of one on this war? Of course, this is a war you personally won't have to fight. Just like when you went AWOL while the poor were shipped to Vietnam in your place.


5. Of the 535 members of Congress, only one (Sen. Johnson of South Dakota) has an enlisted son or daughter in the armed forces! If you really want to stand up for America, please send your twin daughters over to Kuwait right now and let them don their chemical warfare suits. And let's see every member of Congress with a child of military age also sacrifice their kids for this war effort. What's that you say? You don't think so? Well, hey, guess what – we don't think so either!


6. Finally, we love France. Yes, they have pulled some royal screw-ups. Yes, some of them can be pretty #### annoying. But have you forgotten we wouldn't even have this country known as America if it weren't for the French? That it was their help in the Revolutionary War that won it for us? That our greatest thinkers and founding fathers – Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, etc. – spent many years in Paris where they refined the concepts that lead to our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution? That it was France who gave us our Statue of Liberty, a Frenchman who built the Chevrolet, and a pair of French brothers who invented the movies? And now they are doing what only a good friend can do – tell you the truth about yourself, straight, no b.s. Quit pissing on the French and thank them for getting it right for once. You know, you really should have traveled more (like once) before you took over. Your ignorance of the world has not only made you look stupid, it has painted you into a corner you can't get out of.


Well, cheer up – there is good news. If you do go through with this war, more than likely it will be over soon because I'm guessing there aren't a lot of Iraqis willing to lay down their lives to protect Saddam Hussein. After you "win" the war, you will enjoy a huge bump in the popularity polls as everyone loves a winner – and who doesn't like to see a good a**-whoopin' every now and then (especially when it 's some third world a**!). So try your best to ride this victory all the way to next year's election. Of course, that's still a long ways away, so we'll all get to have a good hardy-har-har while we watch the economy sink even further down the toilet!


But, hey, who knows – maybe you'll find Osama a few days before the election! See, start thinking like that! Keep hope alive! Kill Iraqis – they got our oil!!


Yours,


Michael Moore

www.michaelmoore.com

He can be reached at: mike@michaelmoore.co m

AngelsRWorldChamps
03-20-2003, 10:50 AM
Cool Letter

Mo mo Moore where are you cow man http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/angry.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/angry.gif

Charie
03-20-2003, 01:38 PM
Quote[/b] ]and a pair of French brothers who invented the movies

I knew there was another reason to dislike the French!!! * *http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsdown.gif *They made it possible for people from Martin Sheen to Michael Moore to spread their venom over the world!!!!

azwhitewolf
03-20-2003, 02:09 PM
I was just looking at Michael Moore's website.

It's obvious that this anti-drivel comes about due to their (dare I say) intolerance(!) of having a Republican president.

Apparently, his "Bowling for Columbine" wasn't satisfying for one teacher's enjoyment in New York - he showed it to his high school class, and felt joy when the kids booed Charton Heston, discussed their views against 'President' Bush (encapsulations included), and against the right to own a gun.

Some history class! Takes "higher education" to a whole new meaning. Michael Moore, however much of a symptom, is not the blame. The blame is that too many people support this guy's views.

jhains
03-26-2003, 09:43 AM
Friday, March 21, 2003

A reply from John Hains, Jr. to Michael Moore on behalf of President George W. Bush

Michael Moore
Hollywood, CA
mike@michaelmoore.co m

Dear Mr. Moore:

In this response, I will attempt to show you more respect than you cared to show the to the legally elected President of the United States of America.

To begin with, you addressed the acknowledged "leader of the free world" as Governor Bush, when his proper title is either President Bush, or Mr. President. *If you didn't care for the verdict of a judge, and you continually addressed them by anything other than "your Honor" or "Judge" in court, you would be held in contempt. *Behaving in a childish fashion only detracts from your position in a debate. *It is vitally important that you treat your opponent with the respect due to their position, whether you agree with how they got there or not.

Next, you accused the President of "lying and conniving" and then proceed to justify your charge with your own version of warped facts and half-truths. *I will answer each of these accordingly; each allegation followed by my response. *I personally hope that you have enough self worth to engage me in a debate on these topics. *I am confident in my statements, but I am certain that you are also. *Perhaps, through dialogue, you and I can find some common ground and possibly bring one another closer to the truth, whether that be your version or mine.

1. There is virtually NO ONE in America (talk radio nutters and Fox News aside) who is gung-ho to go to war. Trust me on this one. Walk out of the White House and on to any street in America and try to find five people who are PASSIONATE about wanting to kill Iraqis. YOU WON'T FIND THEM! Why? 'Cause NO Iraqis have ever come here and killed any of us! No Iraqi has even threatened to do that. You see, this is how we average Americans think: If a certain so-and-so is not perceived as a threat to our lives, then, believe it or not, we don't want to kill him! Funny how that works!

To say that "NO ONE in America" is gung-ho about war is essentially correct. *No right thinking person would happily decide engage in violence of any type. *However, your statement is misleading in that you are seeking persons who would be emphatic about the death of Iraqis. *Polls by Zogby, Gallup and major news organizations (http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/iraq_poll030321.html ) show clearly that a majority of Americans agree that Saddam Hussein and his regime should not be in control in Iraq. *Even the UN agrees on that point. *The disagreement is on how to achieve that end. *One should not make the mistake of assuming that a war against a regime is an attack on the people it governs. *The United States Government is making every possible attempt to avoid unnecessary death in Iraq, and not limiting that to just the non-combatants, but also to the Iraqi military as well as ours. *This is clearly evidenced by the attack of opportunity on Thursday morning in Iraq, that may have wounded or killed Saddam Hussein. *If Hussein is surgically removed from power, then his regime will fall will minimal effort and loss of life. *In addition, the precise attacks that are focused only on military targets, rather than World War Two style carpet bombing demonstrates the care and concern the coalition military force is using to preserve human life. *One should clearly be able to see that no one in the alliance attacking Iraq is there to kill everything that moves. *The alliance is there to liberate those Iraqi citizens who have been subjugate, oppressed, tortured and killed for the past thirty years by Saddam Hussein and his leadership. *See http://www.indict.org.uk for further evidence to this point, but to save time the summation is that Saddam Hussein is personally responsible for the violent deaths of close to 500,000 Iraqi citizens.

2. The majority of Americans -- the ones who never elected you -- are not fooled by your weapons of mass distraction. We know what the real issues are that affect our daily lives -- and none of them begin with I or end in Q. Here's what threatens us: two and a half million jobs lost since you took office, the stock market having become a cruel joke, no one knowing if their retirement funds are going to be there, gas now costs almost two dollars -- the list goes on and on. Bombing Iraq will not make any of this go away. Only you need to go away for things to improve.

To say that the majority of Americans never elected President Bush is a fallacy. *The reality of the situation is, and one could say I'm being nitpicky about it, that only 51.3% (105,586,274) of REGISTERED voters showed up at the polls for the presidential election. *Of that number, Al Gore received 50,996,064 and George W. Bush received 50,456,167, with the remaining 4,134,043 votes split among the other candidates. *Al Gore won the popular vote by 539,897 votes. *So while 50.27% of the total votes for Gore and Bush went to Gore, that number barely accounts for 24.78% of the 205,821,197 registered voters let alone a "majority of Americans". *As to your accounts of the economic state of the union, you can hardly hold President Bush's Administration accountable for that. *The deterioration of the economy began toward the end of 1999 when the "dot com bubble" on the stock market started to deflate. *It is a very popular political maneuver to blame the current administration for the failures of the previous one, and the same thing is happening today. *A prime example is that President Bush's tax cut is being blamed for the state of the economy, when his budget that includes the tax cut has not been approved and enacted. *If the tax cuts haven't happened they cannot be responsible for anything. *The price of oil, as of this writing, is continuing to decline, just as it did after the invasion of Iraq in 1991. *The stock market is climbing, again, as of this writing, just as it did after the invasion of Iraq in 1991. *The reason behind these to phenomenon is that people are cautious in the time leading up to a war, especially when that time is filled with confusion and inaction. *When the action is started, and the decisions are made, confidence is restored and people are willing to invest. *The price of oil is similarly affected; we can definitively say there is not a shortage, nor is there any risk of a shortage of oil that could be attributed to this conflict. *So in response to your final two statements, bombing Iraq will not only make those problems go away, it already has.

3. As Bill Maher said last week, how bad do you have to suck to lose a popularity contest with Saddam Hussein? The whole world is against you, Mr. Bush. Count your fellow Americans among them.

Bill Maher is a political satirist who has repeatedly ventured outside the realm of acceptable satire. *It is highly unlikely that President Bush, or anyone in the government, is concerned with what he says or thinks. *But, for the record, the only "popularity contest" President Bush has lost against Saddam Hussein was held by the UN Security Council, and three or four of the voters have financial interests in and with Saddam Hussein, so their opinion shouldn't be counted. *To say "the whole world is against" President Bush is a fallacy, just as your previous statement about the Presidential election. *See my response above and apply the numbers to a global level.

4. The Pope has said this war is wrong, that it is a SIN. The Pope! But even worse, the Dixie Chicks have now come out against you! How bad does it have to get before you realize that you are an army of one on this war? Of course, this is a war you personally won't have to fight. Just like when you went AWOL while the poor were shipped to Vietnam in your place.

I would like to point out first and foremost that President Bush is not a Catholic, and so far as I am aware is under no obligation to take direction from the Pope. *That said, the Pope is certainly a wise man, and usually has valuable input which the President has taken and often followed. *The Pope did not, at any point that I can find, declare that war is wrong or a sin. *What the Pope's emissary did say was that any war without U.N. approval "is illegal, it is unjust." *

According to international law, that statement is 100% correct. *However, what some have chosen to ignore is that UN Resolution 1441 already approved, with a unanimous vote, war in Iraq. *Read the resolution and then say this is illegal. *While you're at it, try reading all of the other UN Resolutions and sanctions that permit the use of force that can be cited as approval for this conflict. *As to the comment by Natalie Maines, she is obviously under the same impressions you are, so her opinion neither holds weight for your argument, nor does it detract from it. *I would submit that the reaction by the general public to her comment does take away from some of your other statements in your letter, simply by demonstrating that a significant portion of Dixie Chicks fans do not agree with her, or your view on the war. *Finally, to chastise President Bush for not personally participating in the war makes as much sense as chastising the hospital administrator for not personally performing brain surgery. *The President is an administrator and does not possess all knowledge and skills necessary to perform ever job that falls under his responsibility. *To suggest that he is avoiding harm for reasons of cowardice which are based on hearsay, is simply name-calling and has no place in a proper debate. *The fact of the matter is that the President is in just as dangerous a situation every day as our front line military. *He is constantly under threat of harm from extremists who feel the only way to voice their opinion is to take physical action against him. *Look up statistics at the FBI on how many threats the President receives each day, regardless of how popular he is. *A good example is John F. Kennedy, one of the most popular presidents in history, who was assassinated by an extremist during a parade. *Just becoming president takes extreme courage, let alone remaining one.

5. Of the 535 members of Congress, only ONE (Sen. Johnson of South Dakota) has an enlisted son or daughter in the armed forces! If you really want to stand up for America, please send your twin daughters over to Kuwait right now and let them don their chemical warfare suits. And let's see every member of Congress with a child of military age also sacrifice their kids for this war effort. What's that you say? You don't THINK so? Well, hey, guess what -- we don't think so either!

Of the 535 members of Congress only 0.2% has an enlisted child. *I didn't check, but I suspect that some of those 535 members have siblings or grandchildren in the military as well. *Of the 283,000,000 American Citizens, less than 0.8% (~2.5 million) are in the military. *Now that amount includes all branches of the service (e.g. Coast Guard, Air Force), all functions of the service (e.g. national guard, reserve), as well as officer and enlisted. *I was unable to locate an accurate count of just enlisted personnel, but I suspect its approximately half to two-thirds of the total number. *So in accurate comparison to the one enlisted child of a congressman, between 0.4% and 0.6% are enlisted in the military. *To take that one step further, there are only about 300,000 troops, or .1%, involved in this conflict, and we can probably figure that two-thirds of those are enlisted, leaving 0.07% so actually Congress is ahead of the curve meaning your numerical comparison is not a good basis for your argument. *Your suggestion that Congress should force their children to sacrifice their lives is ludicrous. *Every member of the United States Military is there by choice. *We do not have a conscript army like Saddam Hussein. *We allow our children to decide what path they want to take. *Your argument actually detracts from the magnitude of the sacrifice our military men and women are making by suggesting they did not choose to be there.

6. Finally, we love France. Yes, they have pulled some royal screw-ups. Yes, some of them can be pretty damn annoying. But have you forgotten we wouldn't even have this country known as America if it weren't for the French? That it was their help in the Revolutionary War that won it for us? That our greatest thinkers and founding fathers -- Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin, etc. -- spent many years in Paris where they refined the concepts that lead to our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution? That it was France who gave us our Statue of Liberty, a Frenchman who built the Chevrolet, and a pair of French brothers who invented the movies? And now they are doing what only a good friend can do -- tell you the truth about yourself, straight, no b.s. Quit pissing on the French and thank them for getting it right for once. You know, you really should have traveled more (like once) before you took over. Your ignorance of the world has not only made you look stupid, it has painted you into a corner you can't get out of.

The French, in the past, have provided great inspiration and direction for the United States, and other countries in the world. *However, their stance on this subject is simply incorrect. *I will qualify that the position that France is taking in this conflict appears to be limited to a small number of French citizens, mostly government officials and certain businesses that have been linked to financial dealings with Saddam Hussein. *I do not believe that the majority of France agrees with their government on this issue, and that seems to be validated this week by their recent agreement to assist with the cleanup of chemical or biological weapons in Iraq, after the war. *Once again, however, you have resorted to name-calling. *Your implication that President Bush is implementing a poor foreign policy is flawed, because it is based on the opinions of too few people, and too short a time frame. *President Bush may not be the most traveled individual on the planet, but he has people working for him who are. *He does not make these choices on his own, or from an uninformed position. *Every decision the President makes has been passed through dozens of specialized advisors who examine possible outcomes and ramifications. *That's not to suggest that mistakes will not be made, but generally choices made in the White House are not spontaneous.

With regard to your predictions for the economy, I would again point you in the direction of history. *After the Iraq war in 1991, the economy picked up rather quickly, and gas prices dropped substantially. *

Thank you for the opportunity to present the other side of these extremely popular arguments. I look forward to your response, and your counter-points. *
Respectfully yours,

John Hains, Jr.
jhains@usa.net

Charie
03-27-2003, 09:10 AM
http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsup.gif Jhains, simply lovely. http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsup.gif

http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag19.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/star2.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/unclesam.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/b.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag19.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/unclesam.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/b.gif http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/flag17.gif

crystal
03-27-2003, 10:37 AM
Good Morning All, http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wavey.gif
Welcome MotherKing! Glad to have you with us.
Michael Moore, What an idiot! http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twothumbsdown.gif
I couldn't stand it any longer and had to send this "goober"
(Texas slang for idiot) an email. Probably won't help him see the light, but I had to put in my http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/twocents.gif worth.

Michael,
I don't know who you're speaking for, but it isn't for myself or the majority of other Americans I know. We support our President and our troops. No one ever wants to go to war, but if something's worth fighting for, say, freedom from terrorist attack on American soil, then by God, you better get off your butt and fight. Do you want another 9/11? thought not. How many more people will be required to die at the hands of terroists before you and the rest off your liberal friends will pull your heads out of the sand and face the reality that freedom sometime comes with a price tag. I'm not sure where you came from, but the MAJORITY of Americans wish you'd go back there. Please do not make the mistake of thinking I am uninformed of events around the world or within the borders of my own country. If you feel France is such a noble, wonderful country, please apply for citizenship. I'm sure they would welcome you with open arms. The sick, inconsiderate drivel you call film making will be very popular there I'm sure.
Again, don't make the mistake of saying that the American people don't support our President or troops. You have absolutely no idea how the majority of Americans feel. However, being booed offstage at the awards should have given you a clue. Take the hint! Go home.
Crystal McKnight

Ooops, work calls.... http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/compute.gif
Keep up the good work everyone.
In the end, intelligence will prevail.
Bye for now http://gopusa.com/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/wavey.gif

Idpatriot
03-27-2003, 09:55 PM
After reading Michael Moore's letter, I couldn't help myself, I had to reply to him as well.
Denise
__
Mr. Moore,
Contrary to your belief, (fictitious), millions of Americans support President Bush and are ticked off enough at the likes of you, that we are now ready to show you just what we think of you!

The Dixie Chicks, Martin Sheen, Sean Penn, Susan Sarandon, and everybody else who seems to think that they represent all of America are going to find out that it simply isn't true!

You all live in make believe worlds with more money and materialistic "things" than any average American would care to know what to do with. Why do you suppose that all of you have the money you do? It certainly isn't because you are educated and intelligent....it is because we, regular Americans, PAY OUR HARD EARNED MONEY to see your work. Not any more though....I think you will find in the coming months just how many regular Americans you have all royally ticked off!

By the way, George W. Bush won the election by electoral vote...that is how it is done in this country! Al Gore would have never known what to do after 9/11....he would have been at a loss!

Thank God for President Bush, and thank God for our troops who fight and die for you to have the right to dissent! I don't believe you would have the courage or the guts to do what these true heroes do!

You are a disgrace, and a poor example of an American, you and all of your friends who think like you should be ashamed of yourselves! Why don't you move to France, since you seem to have much more in common with them, than us?

A Patriotic American, and proud to be one!