PDA

View Full Version : Byrd Fingered in KKK Cover-up


Terri
01-16-2003, 04:31 PM
NewsMax
January 16, 2003

A Washington, D.C.-based civil rights leader said Wednesday he has uncovered documents indicating that Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.V., was a member of the notorious anti-black hate group the Ku Klux Klan for a far longer period of time than he has admitted.

"Some people say that he was only in [the Klan] for a couple of months," said Kevin Martin, head of the African-American Republican Leadership Council, in an interview on Fox News Channel's "Hannity & Colmes." "But we have documentation that says he was in for almost two years," Martin revealed.

On Monday, Byrd's spokesman Tom Gavin insisted to NewsMax.com that the senator's days in the Klan, where he served as a Grand Kleagle recruiter, lasted for just "a number of months" in 1943. Gavin said Byrd came clean about his secret past in a series of private conversations the two had over the last five years.

Full Story (http://www.newsmax.com/showinside.shtml?a=2 003/1/16/02349)

Oh right! *You belonged to the Klan for two years and you weren't a racist? *Sure, sell us another bridge.

I've heard firsthand stories of the Klan in the south in the first half of this century. Anybody who belonged was not only a racist but a racist who acted on their feelings in terrible ways.

Terri
01-18-2003, 10:16 AM
More about Byrd and our tax dollars which are used to honor a racist.

Senator Byrd enjoys trappings of seniority (http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/4974455.htm)

Reccos
01-21-2003, 12:56 AM
Are we surprised that the good old US Senator was a KKK guy for longer than he ever admitted? Not at all.

However, on Martin Luther King day, maybe people should pause and ask themselves, who in clear conscience could ever vote for such a man time and again. Hmmm. Could it have been the good citizens of his state who conveniently looked past his record?

Who is worse? The voters or him?

Charie
01-23-2003, 11:31 PM
I vote for the voters and the votee. *I think they're all racist. *Does the fact that the voters are racist, make the votee any less racist? *Or is this another one of those, "one is just as good/bad as the other" fallacious statements?*Neither way answers the question.

IMO the voters are only single people with one vote. *The "good senator" represents the people in his state and supposedly was elected not only because he will vote the "right way" but because he is thought to be intelligent. If he's so darned smart, why is he racist?

Captain Eagle
01-24-2003, 12:33 PM
So what's new? Ho Hum.