What A Day Last Week - Immigration Bill Defeated, Fairness Doctrine Opposition
By Paul M. Weyrich
July 3, 2007
Page 2 of 3
Just watch. Reid may not be able to bring this monstrosity back to life, but he, as majority leader, can certainly manage to highlight the division in the minority party, the closer to the election the better.
It was said that talk radio was responsible for this outcome. As one of the heroes of the effort to kill the bill, Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL), pointed out, the people who called were unusually informed and articulate and the vast majority of them were from the state of the senator whose office they called. Talk radio merely explained what was in the bill. Talk radio even provided constituents with actual paragraphs of the bill. Talk radio didn't force anyone to call. What happened last week was reflective of what the ordinary voter, many of them Democrats, really thought. Talk radio was merely a facilitator.
In that regard, there is an effort to shut down talk radio by reinstating the so-called Fairness Doctrine. Congressman Mike Pence (R-IN), who, like yours truly, used to be a talk-show host, offered an amendment to an appropriations bill providing that no funds could be used to implement the Fairness Doctrine. Despite the full majority party leadership's opposing the amendment, it passed with 309 votes. Over 100 Democrats voted with Pence. That was highly unusual in and of itself. But to have that many Democrats crossing the leadership of their own party is truly remarkable.
The Pence victory is only good for a year, however. But Pence has a legislative bill which permanently would shut down the Fairness Doctrine. In a single day, he acquired more than 100 cosponsors. While that is encouraging, it should be noted that every Republican who voted supported the Pence amendment, including every member of the GOP Leadership.
Hopefully Representative Pence can get some of the hundred Democrats who voted for the one-year bill to cosponsor. Thanks to an initiative by then Congressman James R. (Jim) Inhofe, Members who sign discharge petitions must do so out in the open. If the leadership tries to bottle up his bill in committee (unless he has a sufficient number of Democrats to vote out the bill) he can force the issue through a discharge petition which requires that a bill be scheduled for a vote once there are 218 signatures on the petition. He begins, most likely, with 202 Republicans. He has more than 100 Democrats to try to get the next 16 votes. That should be interesting.
Once again, the people spoke. If it were up to the leadership of the party in charge the Pence amendment would have been deep-sixed. The sentiment was so strong that it overrode the leadership. That almost never happens.
Fortunately, in the Senate Minority Leader McConnell has issued an unusually strong statement against the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine.
And my old friend Trent Lott clarified what he meant by his previous statement -- namely, that talk-radio is running the country and something has to be done about that. That just didn't sound like the Trent Lott I have known for close to 40 years. I need not worry. Lott says he is absolutely against reinstating the Fairness Doctrine. So if Senator Reid tries to attach that bill, supported by so many Democrats, in the middle of the night, he will encounter both McConnell and Lott. McConnell is really pro-freedom. He was a leading force in arguing that McCain/Feingold was unconstitutional when it attempted to regulate political speech.
>> Continued -- Page 1 2 3
| 
