Other Columns by Paul M. Weyrich
Paul M. Weyrich Bio

Printer-Friendly Version

Page 2 of 2

The American Academy of Pediatrics maintains it makes sense to allow older children to watch quality television shows. (In my house "quality" programming for everyone regardless of age means no sex, excessive violence or offensive language.) AAP's advice for younger children is quite different than what the programming personnel at PBS evidently desire. "The first two years of life are especially important in the growth and development of your child's brain. During this time, children need good, positive interaction with other children and adults to develop good language and social skills. Learning to talk and play with others is far more important than watching television." AAP does not recommend allowing children less than two years of age to watch TV and advises sharply limiting the TV watching of older children.

First Lady Laura Bush says, "Television is no substitute for a parent. It doesn't help develop language skills; it's simply background noise." Excessive television watching does not help develop reading skills either. The 2000 National Assessment of Educational Progress's report on fourth grade reading stated, "Students who reported watching the most television, six hours or more, had the lowest average reading score, and those who reported watching four to five, had the next lowest score. Fourth grade students who reported watching less television, either two or three hours or an hour or less daily, had higher and similar scores."

Television should not bear the whole blame for the problems of young Americans. Parents are the most important influences upon their children. Unfortunately some parents use the TV to compensate for their lack of interest in their children. Other parents who recognize the power of that responsibility will set proper limits for their children, including limiting their television viewing. They read to their children because they realize developing their children's language and reading skills is too important to be left to the glitzy graphics of "Sesame Street." Many families have decided to forego TV altogether and many more will participate in this week's "TV Turnoff Week." Families will forego a week of TV. (A PC-Turnoff Week will take place this year also because too many children use the computer for entertainment not education.) There are many other things that children can do other than just watching TV for the sake of watching - taking a hike, participating in a children's group at their church or synagogue, reading a book that really challenges the mind, even visiting their grandparents.

Government cannot be all things and therefore it has no business regulating how many hours children watch TV, use a PC or what they eat at a fast-food restaurant. Those are roles reserved for parents. Civic groups have every reason to urge American parents to do the right thing by wisely limiting their children's eating and viewing. PBS with its Federal Government subsidy has no business becoming involved with a venture such as a 24/7 cable channel for preschoolers. This partnership is one more way for PBS to continue siphoning federal dollars while proclaiming its business savvy. The Federal Government should at least divest itself of this venture which is of no real benefit to American youth. Many conservatives, including myself, believe that there is no constitutional need for bestowing federal funds on PBS or its parent, the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Let PBS really compete in the marketplace with no subsidy whatsoever from federal or state government. A privatized PBS certainly could try to air programs aimed at preschoolers in conjunction with Comcast (without government money) and other partners. Even so I still would not want my youngest grandchildren to watch it.

-------------

Paul M. Weyrich is Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation.

--------------------

Note -- The opinions expressed in this column are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions, views, and/or philosophy of GOPUSA.

>> Back -- Page 1 2