>> McCain chooses Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for V.P.

Other Columns by Joe Mariani
Joe Mariani Bio

Printer-Friendly Version

Few things are more entertaining than listening to Liberals play "Budget Hawk," their new favorite game. It's like overhearing children playing house, imitating their parents. Well, the way children used to imitate their parents, back when it was normal to have two (one of each), and Daddy went off to work while Mommy stayed home. These days, it might take two children to play a divorced Mommy and Daddy, two more to play their new partners (of whatever sex), and several others to play the various step-siblings and support groups of the various Mommies and Daddies. Is that what Liberals meant by "it takes a village to raise a child?"

But back to the new Budget Hawk game. It's the best way Liberals have come up with to undermine support for the war in Iraq. Realizing that most Americans outside of Hollywood abhor wasteful spending, the anti-war crowd often pretends to be horrified by the amount of money spent by the Federal government on Iraq. "Do you know how much Bush's war in Iraq is costing?" they demand to know. "Hundreds of millions a day!" It's always "Bush's war," though Congress voted to send troops to Iraq, and keeps nailing slabs of pork to every defense-related bill. Still, it's all a pose, a calculated outrage designed to reduce support for the war among more fiscally conservative Americans.

As usual, however, Liberals are just throwing out raw numbers for their shock value. They do the same when they complain that an across-the-board tax cut results in the rich keeping more of their own money than the middle class. Naturally, one percent of $1,000,000 is a lot more money than the same fraction of $50,000, so if everyone's taxes were reduced by the same rate, some people would have less taken away by Uncle Sam than others. Yet we still hear Liberals and their pet Democrats screaming about a "tax cut for the rich," because the actual dollar values are different. The truth can often be found in what they don't say.

To complain that keeping the American military -- or, at least, about ten percent of it -- in Iraq costs X number of dollars per day is to ignore the fact that the military isn't cheap to keep home, either. Troops still have to be paid, fed, clothed, housed and trained; equipment still has to be upgraded, repaired and replaced. Most of the little logistical nightmares that accompany troops in the field follow them wherever they go. When playing the Budget Hawk game, Liberals just sort of skip over that part, wanting you to consider the expense in a vacuum.

All things considered, the war in Iraq really hasn't been very expensive in monetary terms, not when you compare it to previous wars and subsequent rebuilding. And it's hard to put a price tag on changing a part of the world. World War II, for instance, cost America about 130% of our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) -- almost a third more then the entire wealth creation of the United States during that time. Korea and Vietnam cost approximately 13% and 11%, respectively. The entire monetary cost of the war in Iraq so far is just 2% of the wealth we create every year, according to research done by Robert Whaples, a Wake Forest University professor of economics.

>> Continued -- Page 1 2