Home | Commentary | News | Forum | The Loft | Online Activist | State News | Resources | Classifieds Subscribe | Mobile | RSS | Contact
Comment
E-mail
Print


Bio
Archives
Price Gouging And Excess Profits
By Harris Sherline
August 17, 2009

Should price gouging be a felony? Should it be a crime for someone to take advantage of market conditions and make too much profit? How can the government let big corporations and rich industrialists get away with making so much money simply because they are in a position to control the supply and manipulate prices? It's not fair. What about the little guy?

"There ought to be a law" is an old cliché. So, why not prevent "price gouging" and "excess profits" by passing laws to regulate everything involved in producing and delivering all goods and services?

Unfortunately, there is one small problem: defining the terms "price gouging" and "excess profits."

So, what are they? You tell me. I haven't a clue, and I'm a retired CPA.

Should "profit" be determined solely on the basis of markup? Just how much should businesses be allowed to mark up the cost of their raw materials and/or labor? Do we need a law against prices that double the cost, or more, such as cosmetics, drugs, groceries, restaurants, dry cleaners, actually just about anything?

Seems simple, doesn't it? But, just how should cost be figured? Does it include labor and materials plus all the other expenses of running a business? That is, literally everything and anything that's necessary to run an enterprise. How about the salaries of the owners or executives who manage businesses? Should they be considered part of the cost of doing business?

Is it even possible to create legislation that regulates literally everything involved in the process? And, what about the cost of implementing such laws: defining, regulating and policing them?

A commentary that circulated on the Internet highlighted the huge markups that drug manufacturers make on the active ingredients in their products. At first glance, the raw data is quite shocking.

Here are some examples of the spread between the selling prices of some popular drugs and the cost of the active ingredients used in manufacturing them: Celebrex - 21,712%; Claritin - 30,306%; Lipitor -- 4,696%; Prevacid -- 34,136%; and Prilosec -- 69,417 %. If anything ever seemed excessive, markups of this order certainly seem to qualify, don't' they?

However, the problem with this type of information is that it omits the other numbers that are needed to make a judgment, such as the costs of manufacturing, distributing and marketing the products. In other words, the full cost of doing business.

Many people think businesses earn as much as 50% or 60% of the prices their products or services sell for. In fact, they may end up keeping as little as one or two percent of their revenue or sales, as in the case of supermarkets, or it may be five to ten percent, as with restaurants. The oil companies, which are routinely castigated by just about everyone, manage to keep (net) only "8.3 cents per dollar of sales. Beverage companies and cigarette makers, by contrast, earned 19.1 cents, and drug makers, 18.4 cents. Indeed, all manufacturers, 8.9 cents on average, made more than 'Big Oil.'" ("Profits of Doom," IBDeditorials, May 1, 2008).

>> Continued -- Page 1 2

 

++ Check out the GOPUSA home page for the latest information.

Last Updated:
Friday 10:26 am EST



Not a member? Click here.
Let's Chat ~ November 16 - 20 by javajoy
Huckabee Slams 'Shameful' Treatment of Obama by qrayjack
Limbaugh: Sally Quinn On Sarah Palin -- Versus Reality by Pillar of Salt
Senate girds for Saturday vote, long battle on health care by qrayjack
Discuss Issues in the Forum

Grassroots Survey Team
View recent survey results
Join the survey team!



GOPUSA Cartoons
Click here!

++ Action Alert: No more apologies....get to work!

++ Semper Fi - Now Just Die - Obama Pushes Euthanasia on Veterans

++ New Survey: Future of America's health care