Bailout: How did your representative vote?

Bailout: How did your representative vote? Go to GOPUSA to see how your representative voted. Find out which ones stood up for conservative values.

E-mail this story to a friend Have comments? Send them to the editor. Printer Friendly Version Subscribe for Free!

The United States Senate voted on May 13, 2008 to block oil exploration in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and the offshore areas of the Pacific and Atlantic Coasts.

It is indeed remarkable how quickly the Senate can organize a negative vote when the issue is of such magnitude and importance to the economy and welfare of the nation. To reverse the damage this vote has done to America's energy independence will take months of endless hearings, making certain that every dissident is heard.

The National Center for Policy Analysis on May 13 identified Congress as the responsible party for the high price of gasoline and summed it up in this manner: "Over the last 28 years, Democrats in Congress and a few Republicans have again and again opposed our drilling for oil in Alaska's ANWR; during the past 31 years Congress has repeatedly prevented us from building any new oil refineries; most recently Congressional Democrats defeated and discouraged any bill that would let us drill in the deep sea 100 miles out."

Equally damaging to energy independence is the envirocrat crowd which manages to capture the moral high ground of environmental issues and use it to advance its own political agenda.

The dominant media has a stable of such envirocrats ready at the call to make statements that for some reason or other seem to be accepted at face value by the Democratic majority and a few Republicans in Congress. The Daily News-Miner of Fairbanks, Alaska, was quick to find such a person. In an interview, reporter R. A. Dillon quoted Arctic Coordinator for the Northern Alaska Environmental Center Pam Miller as saying the vote against drilling in ANWR was a resounding show of support for protecting the refuge for future generations.

That's it. That's all it takes to intimidate the majority in Congress for the foreseeable future. No recognition is given to how little of the ANWR reserve is brought into play for the entire development of the oil drilling site that would yield one million barrels of oil a day from its billions of barrels in reserve.

The footprint, so to speak, that is necessary for full development of a drilling operation to deliver one million barrels of oil a day is a mere 2,000 acres. This tiny footprint represents one one-hundred thousandths (0.0001) of the total area of ANWR's 19 million acres. This is equivalent to one large farm in a state about the size of South Carolina.

Procedures used in modern development of oil fields are environmentally safe and have been accepted as such.

Apparently all three major presidential candidates have expressed their opposition to development of ANWR. It would appear as though the majority of our contemporary politicians have no concept of the energy source of 90% of America's transport vehicles. In recent years they seem content to joust with windmills and chase ethanol rainbows. Their ethanol dream has contributed to the destabilization of grain markets around the world. Some nations that were exporters of grain, especially rice, have now stopped the practice. Food riots, in some instances causing death, are shown daily in TV news broadcasts.

>> Continued -- Page 1 2