Home | Commentary | News | Forum | The Loft | Online Activist | State News | Resources | Classifieds Subscribe | Mobile | RSS | Contact
Breaking News -- Palin resigning as Alaska governor
E-mail this story to a friend
Have comments? Send them to the editor.
Printer Friendly Version
Subscribe for Free!
Other Columns by Greg Reeson
Greg Reeson Bio
Russia's Georgian Message: 'We're Back'
By Greg Reeson
August 20, 2008

Late in the day on August 7, Georgian military forces entered the breakaway republic of South Ossetia in Georgia's north central region in an effort to reclaim control of the hotly contested province. Less than 48 hours later, Russian troops entered the fray, ostensibly to protect Russian peacekeepers and Russian citizens in South Ossetia, advancing to a point less than 50 miles from the Georgian capital of Tbilisi. In the wake of a French-brokered cease-fire, Russia's true motives have become increasingly clear.

Russian motivations for intervening in Georgia on behalf of South Ossetia can be summarized as follows. First, Russia was anxious to counter U.S. influence in the Caucasus, having watched for years as Georgia and the United States increased diplomatic, economic, and military cooperation, and as the Georgian government pushed for membership in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Georgia under Mikhail Saakashvili, prodded and supported by the United States, has been taunting Russia for a very long time. Moscow finally decided it was time to act, using South Ossetia as a means for pushing back against U.S.-led western encroachment.

Second, Russia wanted to send a clear message not only to the nations of the Caucasus region, but to all states that once comprised the former Soviet Union. Make no mistake about it, the audience targeted by Moscow included Ukraine, which has, like Georgia, been distancing itself from Russia while fostering closer ties with the United States, and Poland and the Czech Republic, former Soviet satellite states now serving as hosts for U.S. ballistic missile defense systems. The message: cooperation with the west can be dangerous, and may not be tolerated.

Finally, Russia wanted to show the world that it was well on its way to a full recovery from the dismal times that had followed the collapse of the Soviet Union. While Moscow understood that it had not regained its former superpower status, it was intent on demonstrating that it was capable of asserting itself as a regional power, with the means and the will to impose its wishes on neighboring countries if it felt the need to do so.

Some have speculated that Russia's support of South Ossetia was in part payback for western support of Kosovo's independence from Serbia. I find that argument a little hard to swallow. It is true that Russia had expressed its opposition to Kosovo's independence, and had warned of the potential consequences of western support for the redrawing of borders in the Balkans. But to suggest that Russia was willing to use armed intervention to support the independence of a breakaway province on its periphery is a bit of a stretch. Rather, it is more probable that larger, more complex issues, like those cited above, were instrumental in Russia's decision to go to war with Georgia.

So, what did Russia accomplish with its intervention in South Ossetia and its invasion of Georgia proper? Strategic Forecasting (STRATFOR), a private geopolitical intelligence firm based in Austin, recently argued that Russia had demonstrated three things with its Georgian expedition. The first was that the Russian military was capable of mounting a successful operation. This was important for Russia, for many in the west had discounted the ability of the Russian military to undertake meaningful offensive action given the degradation in equipment and resources that followed the collapse of the Soviet Union. The success of Russian forces in South Ossetia and Georgia, Russia's first offensive action since the fall of the Soviet empire, made it clear that Russia has regained some of its former military capability and is once again capable of operating militarily in its border regions.

>> Continued -- Page 1 2

 

++ Check out the GOPUSA home page for the latest information.

Last Updated:
Friday 4:39 pm EDT



Not a member? Click here.
Palin resigning as Alaska governor by Tiberius
Palin resigning as Alaska governor by Luckyme
Senate bill fines people refusing health coverage by LAPhil
Malkin: Welcome To Obamacare Theater by qrayjack
Discuss Issues in the Forum

Action Alerts
Action Alert: Hands Off My Health Care Decisions!

Legislation and Votes
Roll Call Vote - Cap & Trade Bill on passage
H.R. 2454 - Cap and Trade Bill
House Roll Call Vote To permit citizen defense by the carrying of loaded firearms in national parks
Roll Call Vote - Coburn Amdt. No. 1067; To protect innocent Americans from violent crime in national parks and refuges.
Roll Call Vote - Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act

Grassroots Survey Team
View recent survey results
Join the survey team!



GOPUSA Cartoons
Click here!

++ Help the RNC fight Obama and ABC News!

++ The Future of The Republican Party, tell us what YOU Think!

++ ACLU Terrified by Reprint of 140-yr-old Book