Last Updated:April 23 @ 05:24 pm

Reagan: Obama's Blundering Incompetence

By Michael Reagan

I don't know who's more confused about Syria, President Obama or me.

With his alleged use of poison gas against his own people, including women and children, Bashar al-Assad of Syria has crossed our president's famous red line -- again.

But unlike the last time Assad crossed the president's red line, this time President Obama means business.

No, seriously. He does. Really. He's not just talking you-know-what.

In the words of The New York Times, the war hawk-in-chief is going to "hold the Syrian government accountable for a 'moral obscenity' that has shocked the world's conscience."

An attack on Syria's military assets looks inevitable.

The administration is turning up the rhetoric and lining up our allies to support us. The cruise missiles are parked and taking aim offshore. The news media are on full alert.

It could happen this weekend. But whoever is truly responsible for the use of poison gas in the suburbs of Damascus is still an important question without a credible answer.

The U.S. Department of State, our intelligence agencies and the corrupt charlatans at the United Nations all assure us that it was Assad's side.

They're still collecting the evidence but, "Trust us," they say, "it was the rebels. We'll have the proof for you in just a few months."

Is it just me, or do you feel a "Gulf of Tonkin" moment coming on?

A lot of wise people who don't work for Obama are wondering how Assad would be so stupid.

He's beating the rebels. He's already murdered 100,000 of his unfortunate citizens with bombs and bullets. (Was that OK as long as he didn't use poison gas?)

Why would Assad want to guarantee the military wrath of the United States by using the only weapon short of tactical nukes that could get three ex-peaceniks like Obama, Joe Biden and John Kerry calling for military intervention against him?

Even Hillary Clinton could tell you it's the Syrian rebels who stand to gain the most from Assad's use of chemical weapons.

And the Russians are not the only ones to suspect that the rebels, in their desperation to get outside help, might have sacrificed a few hundred innocent lives to get it.

It wouldn't be the first time that cold-hearted calculus was used in that bloody part of the world.

President Obama insists he's not after regime change in Syria, which is another thing that makes no sense. Is he trying to send Assad some sort of subtle hint?

He'd be better off sending U.S. warplanes on a midnight bombing run to Assad's favorite palace. That's what my father did in 1986 to signal Mr. Gaddafi that we were serious about wanting him to cut the terrorist crap -- and it worked for the next 20 years.

Obama's too smooth for that blunt kind of message-sending. And now he's clearly being suckered into throwing our military weight behind the rebel side in another ugly civil war in the Middle East.

Obama's overall lack of leadership, his dithering and delaying during the revolutions in Libya and Egypt, his empty blustering, his kowtowing to the United Nations -- they don't inspire confidence for success in Syria.

No one -- least of all the White House -- knows what will happen after the missiles hit. Will Russia, Syria's longtime friend and bodyguard, use our intervention as an excuse to reheat the Cold War?

Will Assad say "uncle" and split for wherever island the world's worst despots retire to? Will the democracy-loving Syrian rebels -- whoever they really are -- take over?

Will Syrians just choose up new sides for a new and bloodier sectarian civil war between Muslims or between Muslims and Christians? Will U.S. military aid or ground troops be next?

Don't ask Obama. He's as confused as the rest of us.

We'll probably never know who was responsible for using poison gas in Syria. But we'll always know whose blundering incompetence got us into an unnecessary war there.

---

Copyright ©2013 Michael Reagan. Michael Reagan is the son of President Ronald Reagan, a political consultant, and the author of "The New Reagan Revolution" (St. Martin's Press). He is the founder of the email service reagan.com and president of The Reagan Legacy Foundation. Visit his websites at www.reagan.com and www.michaelereagan.com.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 9.9/10 (78 votes cast)
Reagan: Obama's Blundering Incompetence, 9.9 out of 10 based on 78 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

9 Comments

  1. kerry-USN-RetiredComment by kerryp
    August 31, 2013 @ 6:29 am

    One thing we know for sure is; that obama is good at lies and deceptions but no good at leading this country. With his runaway ego he has painted himself into a corner with his RED LINE policy that keeps wobbling. No country trusts or respects this obama immoral politician.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.9/5 (31 votes cast)
    • jmortensenComment by jmortensen
      September 2, 2013 @ 12:53 pm

      This “Red Line” seems to lead Obama staight to the golf course, or isn’t it time for another vacation ?
      this is a civil war in Syria, and no one wins except the muslim brotherhood .. America should back off and let them settle it

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
    • my04301933Comment by my04301933
      September 2, 2013 @ 5:36 pm

      My word…even Russia is making fun of him…reminding him of his fake “PEACE” award at the begining of his first term….

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote cast)
    • mcrankComment by mcrank
      September 2, 2013 @ 8:22 pm

      This stuff could not have fallen into the lap of a more incompetent and incapable person. And he will make a royal mess of it all.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  2. acommontaterComment by acommontater
    August 31, 2013 @ 9:52 am

    If it were not so serious, obama’s posturing would be hilarious! Here in Texas we call his strategy, “Chicken Fighting”.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (21 votes cast)
  3. Mort_fComment by Mort_f
    August 31, 2013 @ 10:00 am

    Michael Reagan brings up Tonkin Gulf, LBJ’s excuse for VietNam expansion. Allow me to go back a little further. the USS Maine in Havana harbor. Took many years, but the Spanish were finally exonerated. And then the Zimmermann Telegram, (not George, note the second n), which brought us into WWI. Nice excuse for war, but it is still controversial. Was it a British ‘plant’? There is the ‘Official Secrets Act’ in Britain,it has no time limitation. The British have always been masters of disinformation. In arabic it would be called taqqiyah, a subject that is likely to be taught in Indonesian madrasses.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  4. kathyduComment by kathydu
    August 31, 2013 @ 11:32 am

    Why bother with those jerks in the Middle East? They have been at war with each other for thousands of years. If the USA interferes in THEIR wars against each other, it won’t solve anything. It will only needlessly waste more American lives.

    The only other “sensible” thing to do is send OBUMMER, Hitlery, Kerry, Reid, and Peelousy to Syria to “try to make peace.” Hopefully, some chemical bomb or drone will take all of them out in one felt swoop.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.7/5 (19 votes cast)
    • sharkeiComment by sharkei
      August 31, 2013 @ 2:20 pm

      My sentiments exactly. At least the US would be better off.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (14 votes cast)
  5. guardsmanComment by guardsman
    August 31, 2013 @ 10:53 pm

    Now obama wants to get the approval of congress. that certainly is an interesting turn of events. Afew days ago he was going to do it without any help.

    First how long was the UN there before they knew it was Assad. that seems strange to me. there has been flap that that was a lie. so we really don’t know the truth.

    Whats needs to be done is for obama himself to stand before Congress and try to make his case. He has not had to face his opposition since he took office. Turn the Congress lose on this commie leader and don’t let him off the hook.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (7 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





  • "Did someone pee in your Cheerios this morning? Or is this simply your normal, vapid self? The relativity of you..." Comment by Jack Reacher
    Posted in What's the matter with David Gregory?
  • "He looks like a pervert, he reminds me of that red-headed bully with the yellow teeth in "Christmas Story". Other than..." Comment by Jack Reacher
    Posted in What's the matter with David Gregory?
  • "Well....stshepherd, in California when farmers wanted to plant vineyard grapes, the government came in and made the farmer's set certain..." Comment by calizuz1
    Posted in Message to Obama: Liberate the West

Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer