Last Updated:December 20 @ 07:13 am

Sowell: Budget Politics

By Thomas Sowell

Back in my teaching days, many years ago, one of the things I liked to ask the class to consider was this: Imagine a government agency with only two tasks: (1) building statues of Benedict Arnold and (2) providing life-saving medications to children. If this agency's budget were cut, what would it do?

The answer, of course, is that it would cut back on the medications for children. Why? Because that would be what was most likely to get the budget cuts restored. If they cut back on building statues of Benedict Arnold, people might ask why they were building statues of Benedict Arnold in the first place.

The example was deliberately extreme as an illustration. But, in the real world, the same general pattern can be seen in local, state and national government responses to budget cuts.

At the local level, the first response to budget cuts is often to cut the police department and the fire department. There may be all sorts of wasteful boondoggles that could have been cut instead, but that would not produce the public alarm that reducing police protection and fire protection can produce. And public alarm is what can get budget cuts restored.

The Obama administration is following the same pattern. The Department of Homeland Security, for example, released thousands of illegal aliens from prisons to save money -- and create alarm.

The Federal Aviation Administration says it is planning to cut back on the number of air traffic controllers, which would, at a minimum, create delays for airline passengers, in addition to fears for safety that can create more public alarm.

Republicans in the House of Representatives have offered to pass legislation giving President Obama the authority to pick and choose what gets cut -- anywhere in the trillions of dollars of federal spending -- rather than being hemmed in by the arbitrary provisions of the sequester.

This would minimize the damage done by budget cuts concentrated in limited areas, such as the Defense Department. But it serves Obama's interest to maximize the damage and the public alarm, which he can direct against Republicans.

President Obama has said that he would veto legislation to let him choose what to cut. That should tell us everything we need to know about the utter cynicism of this glib man.

The sequester creates more visible damage and more public alarm than if the president were given the authority to trim a little here and a little there in the vast trillions of dollars spent by the government, in order to make a relatively small "cut" that still leaves total federal spending higher than last year.

Only in Washington is a reduction in the rate of growth of spending called a "cut." Moreover, costly boondoggles not covered by the sequester can continue and grow.

Obviously Obama wants public alarm, which he can use to help defeat the Republicans in the 2014 elections, so that Democrats can take back control of the House of Representatives.

When Obama was offered the authority to make the spending cuts wherever he chooses, anywhere in the government's multi-trillion dollar budget, it was the only power that this power-grabbing president has rejected.

Why? Because with this new power would go responsibility for the consequences of his choices. And responsibility for consequences is precisely what both the Obama administration and the Senate Democrats have been avoiding for years, by refusing to pass a federal budget, as required by the Constitution of the United States.

Democrats prefer to get the political benefits from handing out goodies, while Republicans can be blamed for not subsequently raising enough taxes to pay for the Democrats' spending spree.

If Obama succeeds in maneuvering the Republicans into positions that cause them to lose control of the House of Representatives in the 2014 elections, then as a president who never has to face the voters again, he would be in an ideal position to create a big spending liberals' heaven.

But it will be far from heaven for the economy, with Obama-appointed bureaucrats burying businesses in red tape and job-killing costs, while expanding the size and arbitrary powers of government. We could become the world's largest banana republic.

---

Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com. To find out more about Thomas Sowell and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 10.0/10 (43 votes cast)
Sowell: Budget Politics, 10.0 out of 10 based on 43 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

3 Comments

  1. inluminatuoComment by inluminatuo
    March 5, 2013 @ 9:49 am

    The only way to stop the Obama Steamroller is to deny it the fuel which his and the Democrats ability to give away the goodies. You deny him the goodie fuels like he denies America the fossil fuels. You deny them the fuel that drives their steam roller, they same way Americans denied the Germans access to the fuel to run their tanks in the Battle of the Bulge. This is the battle of the Budget bulge and his socialist society sucking salient is so over extended, and his troops and tanks have so overrun their supply lines of free stuff that feeds their attack, even they are becoming unnerved. Only if the Republicans are dumb enough to fund more free stuff will his attack on American Culture and Economy continue. Let their party now reap the rewards of their well earned poverty to be cut off, and face the consequences of attacking American integrity with stolen unearned tax wealth, just like the German Nazi Socialists attacked with money stolen from murdered Jews and subjugated nations.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (9 votes cast)
    • middlegroundComment by middleground
      March 5, 2013 @ 3:52 pm

      The FED created in 1913 actually places the printing of money in the hands of a private entity, but when the Executive and Geitner bought FED notes to keep the interest rates low, it meant Obama controlled the spending rather than the Constitutionally mandated House. It would have been an interesting lesson in Constitutional government, if Geitner had been charged and tried under the 1792 Coinage Act which carried the death penalty for debasing the nation’s coinage, which was in reality what was done when Geitner and Obama bought FED paper. Never happen, but what a great reality TV special. It might rival Watergate.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  2. BillzillaComment by Billzilla
    March 5, 2013 @ 4:43 pm

    Dr. Sowell has nailed it, great article!

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





  • "There are a number of things that President Obama has said that are absolutely right. First, his powers are limited..." Comment by bowler1hat
    Posted in Appeasing Dictators
  • "I've talked to a couple of my Liberal/Progressive friends about this stuff. They tell me that the FBI is LYING about..." Comment by bethcz8
    Posted in 'Racial' Cop Stories That Didn't Make the Cut
  • "Why all of the media attention to this RIGHT NOW? You’d think that somehow police have gone crazy and are..." Comment by MadeinAmerica33
    Posted in 'Racial' Cop Stories That Didn't Make the Cut

Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer