Last Updated:April 17 @ 10:14 am

Bozell: Doubling Down on Anti-Gun News

By Brent Bozell

Everyone can imagine the horror of a madman shooting up an elementary school, especially the horror of losing your six-year-old in the melee. But at some point, the news media's wallowing in Newtown reminds one of Don Henley's satirical song "Dirty Laundry," and how the anchors' eyes gleam through plane-crash news because "it's interesting when people die; we love dirty laundry."

The "O" word that defines the media at times like these isn't "objective." It's "opportunistic."

To be sure, the "news" manufacturers aren't hoping for a school shooting. But that doesn't mean they aren't ready to exploit it. Newsweek columnist Anna Quindlen was explicit back in 1999: ""Perhaps it will take one more school shooting to move the majority of Americans into a position more powerful than that of the NRA. Perhaps it will take one more school shooting to move us from people who support gun control to people who vote it."

A new Media Research Center study reviewed a sample of 216 gun-policy stories on ABC, CBS and NBC in the first month after Newtown, from the Dec. 14 shooting through the morning after President Obama's Feb. 16 speech pushing new gun control proposals. The number is instructive. That's not 216 stories in a month on Newtown. That's 216 stories just about the policy "solution" -- more gun control.

There are zero stories tilting toward a "solution" of curbing violence in TV and movies. That's because the TV networks show violent scenes nightly and are owned by companies with movie studios that profit from violent scenes. Try finding the word "violence" next to "movies" or "television" in a post-Newtown story on the TV networks where it isn't a casual afterthought.

The First Amendment is treated as sacred; the Second Amendment as profane.

As one might suspect, stories advocating more gun control dominated. But "outnumbered" is an understatement. They smothered stories tilting against gun control by 99 to 12, or more than 8 to 1.

It's easy to arrive at that results when anti-gun sound bites were aired almost twice as frequently as gun rights sound bites (228 to 134). When the Big Three network "news" operations sought out guests for interviews, the tilt was 26 to 7.

CBS won the month for being the most shamelessly tilted, with 44 anti-gun stories to just two with a gun-rights emphasis and 37 in the neutral zone. NBC was "best" with a slant of 26 to 5, and 43 neutral stories. Let's hope none of these people would assert that they're "fair and balanced" when absolutely everyone can smell the strong liberal coffee they're making.

No one at the networks waited to begin the campaign advertising disguised as "news." On the first night after the Newtown shooting, just hours after the grisly story broke, "CBS Evening News" anchor Scott Pelley was already pushing: "One wonders if the nature of this crime and the age of the victims might create the debate in Washington that could push legislation along?"

Over on NBC that night, reporter Tom Costello connected liberal dots: "In Colorado, still haunted by the Aurora and Columbine massacres, the governor of that western pro-gun state also said it's time to begin a discussion about sensible gun control. ... Tonight, with dozens dead, including so many children, the debate over guns is back."

The bias here is just loaded with urgency, because every politicized "news" advocate knows that the policy debate on guns operates on emotion, and not on facts. The facts might be the same in the first 10 days as they are three months later, but liberal journalists feel like they're going to lose the debate to the NRA's army of members in fly-over country as soon as the emotion subsides.

That's why the Senate launched an emotional gun control hearing on Jan. 30 starring former Democrat Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, a famous and tragic victim of a madman shooting. Even that Gabby story was a rerun, since the networks also promoted her saying "Enough" to the NRA on Jan. 7 on the anniversary of the Tucson shooting.

Six days before the hearing, a Senate staffer told Broadcasting and Cable magazine that the hearing would not be confined to gun control issues and could include mental health and media violence issues: "I think everything is going to come up." But while the witness panel was balanced, there was no panel of Hollywood executives to face tough questions, the way that Senators love lining up tobacco or oil-company CEOs.

After Newtown, the networks again demonstrated that there's no story on which they can't dramatically stack the deck. Liberal news stories lead to liberal legislation. They know it; and relish it.

---

L. Brent Bozell III is the president of the Media Research Center. To find out more about Brent Bozell III, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 10.0/10 (16 votes cast)
Bozell: Doubling Down on Anti-Gun News, 10.0 out of 10 based on 16 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

3 Comments

  1. inluminatuoComment by inluminatuo
    February 11, 2013 @ 10:36 am

    “The First Amendment is treated as sacred; the Second Amendment as profane.”
    Fools all, it is the second amendment which protects all others especially the first amendment that the Progressive Liberals so abuse as they would the second. The fact of the matter is that our best concealed weapon today as in the past are the returning gun educated veterans who walk silently among us undetected who learned how to protect in blood, sacrifice and courage what those at home would unprotect in fear, shame and sacrifice of YOUR freedoms. The well healed well protected and body guarded media executives and Hollywood mouths who would devour your weapons know in their hearts that it is they who live in fear of us, so would disarm us while they remained armed themselves. Hitler and Goebbels are ever reincarnated by the fearful to protect themselves and their elevated positions, and leave others to trust to their good will which they have none but their own will to dominate you and your property to the benefit of their own self-interest. How can you trust those who succumb to fear, which is source of all death and destruction. Look to the light and the courage to defend yourselves and your own freedoms. History has proven what deleterious things result when you abrogate to governments the responsibility of defending self as an individual. Soon there is no self and no individuality, which is required for the power of freedom to bloom. It is its very mother’s milk.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (12 votes cast)
  2. JudyComment by Judy
    February 11, 2013 @ 12:04 pm

    Very few are talking about the real problem, psychotic drugs. From what I can glean everyone of those mass murderers were on those drugs. In addition many suicides are from the drugs. Psychiatrist Peter Breggin has laid this all out.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (8 votes cast)
    • vevaComment by veva
      February 11, 2013 @ 4:04 pm

      “A Compromised Generation”, by Beth Lambert, goes into depth of the prescribed mind-altering drugs to school age youth. http://www.deweesereport.com , Jan. 2013, provides a list of OVER 50 cases of school shootings, knifings, threats and hostages taken with dates, weapon used, results and the “drug” in use by the perpetrator. Where is the outrage of 7 Million kids on prescribed drugs! Where are the ‘hearings’ and network stories about that? Blame guns and ignore the reason for their use.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer