Last Updated:April 17 @ 10:14 am

Towery: GOP Leaders May Finally Be Catching On

By Matt Towery

Speaker John Boehner finally declared this week that President Obama's goal over the next few years is to "annihilate" the GOP. Wow, he finally figured that out. And to reporters about his ticket's defeat in November, Rep. Paul Ryan stated that there was a failure to turn potential Republican voters out -- again, another "ah ha" moment.

What is really going on is that the more old-time Republican Establishment is starting to realize that simply playing the same old game against a new, brilliant and Democratic political juggernaut led by their symbol of success, President Obama, will likely yield the same results.

To Ryan's credit, he told the same group this week that what Republicans need is more "Jack Kemp." And Ryan is so right.

Remember, Kemp was a "conservative opportunity" Republican with an always positive attitude, which he carried with him as secretary of housing and urban development under President George H.W. Bush. Kemp reached his political pinnacle as the vice presidential nominee running with former Sen. Bob Dole in 1996.

Kemp was added to the ticket in part because of his long history of advocating tax cuts, in part to advance the concept of supply-side economics. Dole and Kemp had clashed in earlier years, with Dole viewed as the more traditional "Establishment-type" and Kemp the populist conservative who had a strong interest in issues that were typically not part of the GOP agenda, such as the health of cities, moving those in public housing toward ownership and responsibility for their homes, and eliminating weapons and drugs from the hands of the criminals who in urban areas possessed them.

When it came to issues such as immigration and gay rights, Kemp was more of a pragmatist. In June of 2006, Kemp warned in a column, "Failure to address the legitimate issue of immigration reform could also do great harm to the Republican Party."

He advocated both the tough approach of truly enforcing the borders while at the same time crating some form of status for those already present.

Now conservatives such as Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida are increasingly proposing such moves in order to finally fix an issue that is costing the nation lost tax revenue and Republicans votes among a growing Hispanic/Latino electorate who once viewed the Republican Party as a vehicle to help lift them up.

More importantly, both Ryan and Rubio seem to represent a new breed of Republican leaders who want to double down on the GOP's devotion to issues of fiscal responsibility, but couple them with policies that offer opportunity and hope to a large number of people who now view themselves as part of "the middle class" that clearly is drifting in the direction of not only a liberal but, in many ways, increasingly socialist leadership.

Some very strong conservatives have urged that even Republicans engage the White House and Democrats in Congress with blunt talk, spelling out clearly what they observe, pulling no punches. And it appears, with Boehner's declaration as to President Obama's intentions, even the "Establishment Republicans" might be reaching that point. They replaced the word "progressive," which is increasingly being used to label President Obama, with the more accurate label of "moderately socialist," when describing current Democratic policy in Washington.

But if Republicans are to start stating the obvious about the president's goals of redistributing wealth and resources through various policies and legislation, they must offer an attractive alternative.

That means by its very necessity embracing the needs of the nation's cities, finding a way to provide a path toward some form of legal worker status that requires paying taxes and no shortcut to actual citizenship. And, most importantly, that requires explaining how the Republican policies of lower taxes, less government and defense of personal liberties actually benefit the many voters who in November either chose Obama out of fear, on a coin toss or simply decided not to come out in support of Gov. Romney.

Republicans need more plain-speaking leaders who fight for providing opportunity to more people through less government intrusion. In other words, the Republicans truly do need more Jack Kemps.

---

Matt Towery heads the polling and political information firm InsiderAdvantage. Follow him on Twitter @matttowery. To find out more about Matt Towery and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2013 CREATORS.COM

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 7.3/10 (4 votes cast)
Towery: GOP Leaders May Finally Be Catching On, 7.3 out of 10 based on 4 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

4 Comments

  1. teapartyproudComment by teapartyproud
    January 27, 2013 @ 12:46 pm

    I have to laugh at the “accurate” description of Obama as a “moderate socialist”. He is a full blown radical communist.

    His only moderation is in not implementing his communist policies too quickly so as to not wake up the willfully ignorant masses before it is too late to stop it.

    As for the Republican party, I’ll finally believe they are awake when they forcefully and vehemently fight back against Obama and the democrats as if they were trying to save the country from total annihilation.

    I won’t hold my breath waiting. They’re just now getting around to some mild lip service, while still cowering in fear of being called the ultimate evil of the present day,(gasp, dare I say it) a racist.

    They are disgustingly and shamefully weak.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)
    • cdrcodyComment by cdrcody
      January 28, 2013 @ 1:27 am

      Well Put! But nothing will change until we get rid of these old coots in the Republican leadership and put people like Ryan in those positions. Until then those democratic socialists will keep running things into the ground.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  2. rex1776Comment by rex1776
    January 28, 2013 @ 6:48 am

    “Where’s the outrage!? ‘ The elections were fraudulent. When Obama lost in every state requiring voter ID and won every state that didn’t, that’s suspicious. And in some Pennsylvania counties how could there be more votes cast for Obama than there are registered voters? When 110% of a counties registered voters vote for him those ballots should not be counted as valid. And the black panthers intimidating voters at the polls – again.
    And then there’s the California Electoral College where one must be a registered democrat to br an electorate. That’s why Presidential candidates don’t campaign in California.
    “If our enemies infiltrated our Government to destroy us, they would do exactly what Obama IS doing. “

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  3. mcrankComment by mcrank
    January 28, 2013 @ 9:08 pm

    And not a day too soon.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer