Last Updated:July 25 @ 08:15 pm

Shapiro: Why Does Barack Obama Sound Like Ahmadinejad?

By Ben Shapiro

Here are two quotes from two world leaders. See if you can guess the speakers.

Leader #1: "Any action that is provocative [and] offends the religious thoughts and feelings of any people, we condemn. Likewise, we condemn any type of extremism. Of course, what took place was ugly; offending the Holy Prophet is quite ugly."

Leader #2: "The future must not belong to those who target Coptic Christians in Egypt ... The future must not belong to those who bully women ... The future must not belong to those corrupt few who steal a country's resources ... The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam."

The first quote is from Iranian dictator and Islamist radical Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Piers Morgan's CNN program. The second quote is from President Obama at the United Nations.

The message is the same. Both speakers equate nasty rhetoric with violence. Both suggest that slandering the "Prophet" is off limits. And both fundamentally misunderstand what free speech is all about.

We understand why Ahmadinejad doesn't value free speech -- he's the dictator of a fundamentalist nation, a cardboard cutout propped up by the mullahs. But President Obama is an elected leader of the freest nation on the planet, the country most responsible for the rise of free speech around the globe. How could he get up before the world's foremost international body and treat exercise of free speech as equivalent to violence?

And that's what Obama most certainly did. Just to clarify his statements, he quoted Mahatma Gandhi, surely the unwisest wise man of the 20th century: "Intolerance is itself a form of violence and an obstacle to the growth of a true democratic spirit."

Nothing could be further from the truth. There are many types of intolerance. Intolerance of murder is not a form of violence; it's a form of morality. Intolerance for Islamism isn't a form of violence; it's a form of freedom. Violence is a form of violence. Intolerance without violence or compulsion is a form of free speech.

But President Obama lives in a world of words. His presidency is marked by his worship of his own rhetoric; he's said repeatedly that his worst mistake as president is a failure to communicate with the American people, as though his actions are secondary to his mellifluous statements. Obama believes that words drove Muslims to murder our ambassador in Libya, storm our embassy in Tunisia and burn American flags in Cairo. He thinks that words and actions can be equated.

So too does Ahmadinejad. He feels that a Danish cartoon caricaturing Mohammed and the riots that followed are two sides of the same coin. He believes that every word against Islam is the equivalent of shouting fire in a crowded theater.

There can be no free speech under this view. Free speech becomes unfree; every word has consequences that far outweigh the verbiage. Furthermore, all speech is created equal. A speech encouraging the slaughter of Jews in Israel becomes the same as a film mocking Mohammed.

President Obama doesn't truly believe in the First Amendment. He believes in a restricted vision of free speech, a politically correct vision. That's not free speech at all. It's tyranny. Which is why he sounded so much like Ahmadinejad at the U.N.

Ben Shapiro, 28, is a graduate of UCLA and Harvard Law School, a radio host on KRLA 870 Los Angeles, and Editor-At-Large for Breitbart News. He is the four-time bestselling author of "Primetime Propaganda." To find out more about Ben Shapiro and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 9.5/10 (175 votes cast)
Shapiro: Why Does Barack Obama Sound Like Ahmadinejad?, 9.5 out of 10 based on 175 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

37 Comments

  1. inluminatuoComment by inluminatuo
    September 26, 2012 @ 8:48 am

    When given a choice between defending our Constitutional rights (Like Free Speech) which he swore to protect and defend, or choosing to defend the Holy Prophet, Obama defaults to his Muslim education each and EVERY time. Can Sharia law be far behind? Wake sleeping America, there is a Muslim mole in our midst, who is undermining the foundation of our American existence, and consuming the roots of the very plant which nourishes our American freedoms.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.9/5 (73 votes cast)
    • ccfontenComment by ccfonten
      September 26, 2012 @ 9:15 am

      The only thing I disagree with your comments is this: mohammed is NOT a holy prophet…………he is an UNHOLY rapist, murderer, pedophile.
      And yes, odumbo has stated before that if push came to shove, he would side with the muslims.
      After this disgraceful speech at the UN and his refusal to meet with any of the world’s leaders so that he could go on The View, do 60 Minute interviews, do fund raising, etc…………I have never in my adult life been so afraid for my country.
      And I am truly ashamed and disgusted with this president and both houses of Congress.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.8/5 (87 votes cast)
    • genesalComment by genesal
      September 27, 2012 @ 8:47 am

      Yes, what’s Holy about a Moon God?

      @ccfonten
      And I am truly ashamed and disgusted with this president and both houses of Congress.

      Eunuchs fill the Halls of the Congressional Houses. While American burns, Nero_ly speaking.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
  2. BobinmsComment by Bobinms
    September 26, 2012 @ 9:33 am

    Even Madonna acknowledges that we have a black Muslim in the White House.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (46 votes cast)
    • agnesdayComment by agnesday
      September 26, 2012 @ 9:57 am

      Most insightful thing I ever heard come from her lips.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.6/5 (34 votes cast)
    • oleteabagComment by oleteabag
      September 26, 2012 @ 12:36 pm

      Reply to Agnesday: I’m not sure it came from her lips.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.6/5 (10 votes cast)
    • LAPhilComment by LAPhil
      September 26, 2012 @ 2:39 pm

      I couldn’t tell if she thought that was a good thing or a bad thing.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  3. tejanoangelComment by tejanoangel
    September 26, 2012 @ 9:49 am

    Please help me understand. In his recent speech to the United Nations, was President Obama being brave and bold, naïve, or hypocritical? I refer to his arguments that since America reveres the “right of free speech,” then the whole world MUST revere and uphold that right as well. Well, pardon me, is that not “forcing” our views on the rest of the globe and is that not why many sectors of our globe hate us? We cannot preach our values world-wide. Yet, Mr. Obama was preaching.

    And was the President projecting himself to appear naïve and clueless on the world stage to pretend that his preaching would “heal” the planet?

    Where is the hypocrisy? Well, it seems to me that when you chastise the United States Supreme Court for upholding the right of “free speech” for corporations in this county, but then you rebuke Egypt and Libya for NOT allowing free speech in their countries—well, what can I say? You are being hypocritical.

    What we have here, in President Obama, is a politician imprisoned in his own verbiage, of the past and present. It is called effeteness, lacking the evolution of thoughtfulness.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.0/5 (26 votes cast)
    • inluminatuoComment by inluminatuo
      September 26, 2012 @ 10:46 am

      Withdraw our troops, Withdraw our bribe money, withdraw our technology and just watch how fast the Middle East degenerates back into sheep, goat and camel herders.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (42 votes cast)
    • nickster99Comment by nickster99
      September 26, 2012 @ 10:55 am

      And the sooner the better!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (33 votes cast)
    • oleteabagComment by oleteabag
      September 26, 2012 @ 12:41 pm

      Reply to Inluminatuo:

      Hell, they are barely above that NOW, in spite of all the money and technical assistance we have poured into their ****** countries. But I agree–we should withdraw ALL military and financial aid. These homicidal cockroaches can’t EAT their damned oil, nor can they grow their own food (Hello, most of the Middle East is a freaking DESERT–the exception, of course, being Israel who irrigated, sowed and reaped and made the desert bloom, which is why these primitive goat herders HATE them, by the way.) It amazes me that these countries would STARVE without our aid, and yet they continually bite the hand that feeds them. WHY do we want to ensure the survival of people who hate us and only want to destroy us? This is beyond stupid! It is like we are PAYING these people to attack us. Why??

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (42 votes cast)
    • AMVoterComment by AMVoter
      September 26, 2012 @ 2:19 pm

      What we have is a lying sociopath living in the white house.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.7/5 (25 votes cast)
    • lanuitComment by lanuit
      September 26, 2012 @ 6:21 pm

      You said please help me, so here goes:

      Maybe I can help you understand a few ideas that are implicitly accepted by many in the United States, but not explicitly understood or accepted. Any idea that is not explicitly understood, from the ground up, by the rational processes of induction and deduction—such as many members of the Libertarian party are guilty of—is always in danger of being denied, undermined, and destroyed. You misunderstand the nature not merely of the particular concept of free speech, but of the concept “rights,” in general. The right of free speech is a derivative right that depends on the right to life and all which that entails. I cover some of these ideas in the short essay below.

      Man—the grammatical shorthand for men and women—has rights because of his nature as a rational being. Look in the mirror. Do you see any characteristic of your body that would defeat any predator even half your size, such as razor-sharp fangs, huge hands, feet, and claws, protective covering such as fur or thick skin? No, you don’t. What you do have, which s not visible, is your human brain, which can direct you in building what you need to protect yourself from minor predators, such as wolves, and also, human predators, such as Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao Zedong, and so on. No predator considers the so-called animal rights of other species, which are their prey and sustenance. If predators in the wild do not consider “animal rights,” then why should humans consider them? The idea is absurd, because there are no such rights, for reasons implied below. Those predators take what they want if they are powerful enough—and eat it.

      No non-human animal considers your right to life. If you are to live, then you must consider non-human animals as possible danger or prey, as they do toward each other. If you are to live, then you must have the right to the means of sustaining your life, which is property, in the form of food, weapons, shelter, fire, etc., which you have produced, directly by the use of your own mind and body, or indirectly by, for example, trade with other people. If you are to live, then you must have a right to life in relation to other human beings. And other human beings have the same right to life.

      For a human being, every right, such as the right to property, depends on the recognition—not the privilege or gift from the tribe, clan, or government—of your right to life by other people (but don’t expect a large predator such as a brown bear to respect your right to life; to such a creature, you might be a menace or a meal, depending on how he construes you in relation to his own existence at a particular moment). It is only against other human beings that your rights are meant to protect you (but only if you do not consider other humans your prey), and only if you have the retaliatory means to enforce that recognition. If you don’t have the latter, then some other people, including elected and un-elected government officials, consider you to be nothing more than prey, the means to their ends.

      You should not depend on the good will of other human beings to respect any of your rights. Other people might be good or they might be bad (according to objective standards), but you can count on the fact that some people don’t attack you only because they fear your retaliation. Other people don’t attack you because they, quite reasonably, want to be left in peace and live their lives as they see fit, as you do. They are not concerned with or about you, yet they probably would not be able to put their desires in explicit philosophical terms (and some would not care to), which in the long run is their—and your—only defense. Because you probably can’t fight a mob by yourself and win, you need to be able to rally like-minded people around you. They, and you, must love an idea, the rational idea that you have a right to life on this earth by virtue of the fact of your existence as a rational being.

      For example, you say that you just want to live as you please (whether reasonable or not is not at issue). But along comes a man (and his followers) who says he only wants to live as he pleases, and he pleases to take your woman, your property, your life. What, in philosophical terms, is your defense against him? How will you rally your compatriots against him? If you can’t state the reasonable, objective terms of your existence right down to the root of the right to life as a rational being, as Thomas Jefferson did in writing the Declaration of Independence, then your desire is no more valid than his, nothing more than a whim or wishful thinking. And if he and his followers, no matter how wrong in objective terms, are stronger than you, then few men will stand with you against him, and he and his whims will win and destroy you. There will be cowards and cop-outs; there will be those who say it’s better to go along to get along—and besides, doing so saves their own skins. They will hang back on the tyrant’s side, and then rush in when you give up or the battle is over to take what you could not defend.

      Your right to use your mind, because of your nature as a rational being, in the enhancement and furtherance of your own well-being and to create for yourself and those you love the life you want, is the key to your right to life. Every other right depends on this right.

      The above is merely a quick essay in which I have tried to cover a lot of ground in a short time. There is much that I have left out, for example, the concept of physical force. Only the threat of physical force can compel a man to do what he would not otherwise do. And only government has a virtual monopoly on the use of physical force. The fact that a man takes advantage of his mental abilities in business to better his situation in life, and people of lesser ability do not do as well in business as he, is not a threat or use of physical force by him.

      Beware of politicians who speak of pragmatism, because he is speaking of taking actions without regard to any principles. President Obama, however, has taken this a step further. In his May 21, 2009 speech on national security, he said that “The Framers who drafted the Constitution could not have foreseen the challenges that have unfolded over the last 222 years. But our Constitution has endured through secession and civil rights, through World War and Cold War, because it provides a foundation of principles that can be applied pragmatically; it provides a compass that can help us find our way” (http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-national-security-5-21-09). He thereby construed the Constitution as a method of using pragmatism. Pragmatism is a school of philosophy that says act first, think about principles second—if at all. If it works, do it. You can’t know beforehand whether it will work. Don’t be tied down to any silly principles, because principles are obstacles in the way of getting what you want—regardless of whether what you want is right.

      For a better understanding, I refer you to the works of Ayn Rand, her novel, We the Living, The Fountainhead, and Atlas Shrugged (part two of the movie debuts Oct. 2). For a quicker read about the subjects covered here, check out her The Virtue of Selfishness and Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.4/5 (5 votes cast)
  4. noveldogComment by noveldog
    September 26, 2012 @ 10:40 am

    I don’t know, his dad was a rambling man.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
    • smartwayComment by smartway
      September 30, 2012 @ 3:56 pm

      Hey Noveldog,

      Which one are you talking about? The Kenyan fairy tale dad…or the COMMUNISTPARTYUSA propagandist? Get the true story from “Dreams from My Real Father”….
      Visit=> http://www.ObamasRealFather.com

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
  5. wedeyComment by wedey
    September 26, 2012 @ 11:05 am

    I have to hold a little longer. Hopefully this poor excuse for a President of the United States will soon be gone.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (22 votes cast)
  6. bcdcComment by bcdc
    September 26, 2012 @ 11:26 am

    as a canadian, let me first say i truly love America and all it (used to) stand for….but I must take exception to the often heard statement about USA being the “freest nation on the planet”

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.0/5 (13 votes cast)
    • gopluvaComment by gopluva
      September 26, 2012 @ 1:14 pm

      It is still the freest nation including Canada. Soon as we get rid of obama and obamacare we can prove it again.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.7/5 (15 votes cast)
  7. liltina20Comment by liltina20
    September 26, 2012 @ 11:31 am

    When BHO talks like this and continually spins the truth, is it any wonder there are increasing numbers of militias in this country?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.9/5 (18 votes cast)
    • gopluvaComment by gopluva
      September 26, 2012 @ 1:12 pm

      I hope you are right about militias.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.6/5 (5 votes cast)
  8. concit321Comment by concit321
    September 26, 2012 @ 12:03 pm

    Very frightening to think of the future under Obama. I must take exception with one comment however. Mahatma Ghandi has been an inspiration for many pacifists. I believe his concept of intolerance is far from that of the western world today. To quote Mr. Ghandi, “Tolerance obviously does not disturb the distinction between right and wrong, or good and evil.” I believe he expects each to leave room for another’s viewpoint. Radical Islam cannot do that based on the premise that brotherhood requires all to be in the fold of Islam. There are Muslims who are against violence and are deep spiritual thinkers, who know the jihad we all face is within us, not without, also called sin by Christians. Mystics of many traditions share the view that the battle is within ourselves and the purpose of life much more than simply achieving and possessing.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (10 votes cast)
    • taliesin319Comment by taliesin319
      September 26, 2012 @ 1:11 pm

      The Koran does not mince words or espouse euphemisms. The Koran wants every, I repeat every infidel either coverted to Islam, living under the sufference of Islam, paying a jhizya
      to keep his Godgiven life unless some muslim ( lower case intentional ) wishes him to take it from him if he appears unsubdued. The third choice is to fight to the death if need be every muslim. If a muslim does not believe every word of the Koran as it is written, if he does not embrace every tenet of this heinous Faschist ideology he becomes an apostate and thus his life is up for grabs to any muslim who decides he is just not muslim enough. There is only one Islam and only one muslim. If you believe anything else your life is at risk from all of the aforementioned. Do you and your family a great service and get informed by reading the Koran and its associated books. Try to do that reading on an empty stomach.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (15 votes cast)
  9. oleteabagComment by oleteabag
    September 26, 2012 @ 12:26 pm

    It’s really quite simple. Obama sounds just like Ahmadinejad because both are America-and-Israel-hating MUSLIMS. Any questions?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (27 votes cast)
  10. oleteabagComment by oleteabag
    September 26, 2012 @ 12:34 pm

    It isn’t like this is a big surprise, when in his OWN WORDS before he ever ran for President, he wrote, “If things turn ugly, I will stand with the Muslims.” In his own writings, he repeatedly told us who he was and what he believed, and the idiot liberals who elected him chose to simply ignore that and believe what they wanted to believe about him.

    They were so hellbent on electing the “first African-American President”, they did not notice or CARE that the particular one they CHOSE happened to be an America-hating Muslim/Communist whose primary goal was to weaken America from inside and allow Muslim power to advance in quantam leaps.

    This is the problem with the delusional liberals. They decide what they WANT to believe, then behave as though that were REALITY, which, of course, it is not–and that is why it NEVER works out well. You should consider that, the next time you are tempted to vote for a Democrat–ANY Democrat. The Democratic party has been co-opted by Communists and other enemies of our country who are working day and night to DESTROY it–a vote for ANY of their candidates is a vote to destroy our country. They are TRAITORS and cannot be trusted. Do NOT vote for ANY Democratic candidate, unless you want to see our republic destroyed and reduced to a Third World sh*t-hole.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (22 votes cast)
  11. oleteabagComment by oleteabag
    September 26, 2012 @ 12:45 pm

    We don’t even HAVE a President, and have not had one since he was elected–we have a Campaigner-In-Chief, and NOTHING is going to stay him from completing his campaign rounds–not attacks on our embassies, murder of our ambassadors, etc. The CAMPAIGN is all-important and all he cares about. He has done little but campaign since he was elected. It is apparently the ONLY area where he has ANY competence at all, and so, not surprisingly, he plays to his strengths.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (19 votes cast)
    • gopluvaComment by gopluva
      September 26, 2012 @ 1:16 pm

      You are so right. He does not let anything get in the way of his campaign. Did you see the clip of him on the view? What a joke.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (6 votes cast)
  12. clarkentComment by clarkent
    September 26, 2012 @ 1:25 pm

    Obama=Failure

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (10 votes cast)
  13. stormymonday2Comment by stormymonday2
    September 26, 2012 @ 1:31 pm

    Maybe they both sound the same because they have the same speech writer? Morsi Sounded like them both too. Hmmm?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (5 votes cast)
  14. way2coolComment by way2cool
    September 26, 2012 @ 2:30 pm

    Now we know for certain, Achminajhad is obama’s mentor! I was going to say ‘real father’ but how many can he have!

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.6/5 (7 votes cast)
  15. issyComment by issy
    September 26, 2012 @ 3:04 pm

    We all know that barry obama Rama Lama Ding Dong Cornholio is a POS. Has he ever spoken up about the slander of Jesus Christ or of the Jewish people. obama appears to be a closet Muslim. This talk by him at the UN was just another *** kissing of the Muslim countries. They do not was peace. They want to destroy the Christian/Judeo world. Folks this poor excuse for a community leader must go in Nov.(actually Jan.)May God Bless all of you good folks out there and especially our great fighting men & women. The Good Lord willing they will have a new Commander comes 2013. Please remember to vote in Nov. This is the most important election in the history of our Grear Nation.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.8/5 (8 votes cast)
  16. wdjincComment by wdjinc
    September 26, 2012 @ 3:55 pm

    President Hussein Obama is obviously a Muslim in sheep’s (Christian’s) clothing. Interesting that he does not condemn attacks on Christians such as those made by his buddy Maher re: Jesus Christ.

    He continues to apologize and kiss the behinds of these Muslim leaders while our country continues to lose respect.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (8 votes cast)
  17. mrsgunnut10Comment by mrsgunnut10
    September 26, 2012 @ 6:25 pm

    Mr. Shapiro has a very good question. After listening to Obama speak for 3 1/2 years on various subjects where his views are even simuliar to Ahmadinijad’s, the answer seems to be simple. He is a Muslim. All we have to do is wait and watch – sooner or later, the truth will prevail. Thank you for your time. TSgt., USAF Retired.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  18. eagleeyeComment by eagleeye
    September 26, 2012 @ 7:53 pm

    We can only now pray this man is not re-elected as I am in the opinion Obama is in bed and quite possibly one of the leaders of the Muslim brotherhood which explains why he met right after the election in Egypt with these satanist torturing stone age BARBARIANS come to power! I am sorry all you democrats whom voted for this change but YOU WERE FOOLED! Unfortunately, it is what it is and the time has come to DEFEND WITH YOUR LIFE THIS GREAT COUNTRY AND STAND WITH “TRUTH” TOGETHER AS ONE and recognize this CANCER and NEVER EVER TRUST THESE SO-CALLED PEACEFUL ONES WHOM SMILE AS THEY STICK AN KNIFE INTO YOUR HEART! DISTANCE IS OUR ONLY SOLUTION YET ONCE INSIDE THEN THE “TRUTH” STANDS WITH YOU! We are BEING HUNTED and I am afraid they are going to act if Obama is re-elected! He has said he wanted to form an citizen kind of military for society! I feel they are already here and “THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT IS READY TO SHOW IT’S HEAD”! PREPARE TO DEFEND NOW!

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  19. smthnsmllsnthewhthowsmstbobaaaamaComment by smthnsmllsnthewhthowsmstbobaaaama
    September 26, 2012 @ 7:59 pm

    I’ll also take a guess at why they sound alike. 1) They are both Nazis. 2) They think alike. 3) They have planned out how Obama will talk when in front of us. 4) They are dictators. 5) They do not care what anyone wants or thinks because they intend to use muslims and offending them as a means to shut us up so they can implement Nazi rule which they covered up with the name Shariah. 6) They think that everything they do will work with a nation who is stubborn, hard-headed for God and still LOVES GOD Almighty and His having come in the flesh, even for their rotten sins. 7) Because Islam/Nazi Reich (IRAN=International Republic of Arian Nations)…ARIANS ARE NAZIS.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.0/5 (2 votes cast)
  20. freedomfighterComment by freedomfighter
    September 26, 2012 @ 8:07 pm

    What about his tossing the Christian religion, and GOD under the bus?. This is OK, because they are not part of his persuasion.
    I cannot believe we have a Muslim leaning Proxydent, who claims Christianity as his faith, while constantly quoting the Koran. One cannot serve two masters.
    TAKE OUT THE TRASH IN NOVEMBER, AND RID US OF THIS MENACE, IMPOSTER, IN THE WHITEHOUSE.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)
  21. eagleeyeComment by eagleeye
    September 26, 2012 @ 8:29 pm

    We can only now pray this man is not re-elected as I am in the absolutely of opinion Obama is in bed and quite possibly one of the leaders of the Muslim brotherhood which explains why he met right after the election in Egypt with these satanist torturing stone age BARBARIANS morsi to tell him to prepare to come to power! I told one of my neighbors whom is an card carrying COMMUNIST DRAFT DODGER FROM THE 60′s when this obozo was running he was a PLANT AND AN MUSLIM ENEMY! My neighbor told me I had a lot of things which I did not need at which point I escorted him to the door! He has a STAND UP OF OBOZO IN HIS HOME! I am not kidding at all! Unfortunately, it is what it is and the time has come to DEFEND WITH YOUR LIFE THIS GREAT COUNTRY AND STAND WITH “TRUTH” TOGETHER AS ONE and recognize this CANCER and NEVER EVER TRUST THESE SO-CALLED PEACEFUL ONES WHOM SMILE AS THEY STICK AN KNIFE INTO YOUR HEART! DISTANCE IS OUR ONLY SOLUTION YET ONCE INSIDE THEN THE “TRUTH” STANDS WITH YOU! We are BEING HUNTED and I am afraid they are going to act if Obama is re-elected! He has said he wanted to form an citizen kind of military for society! I feel they are already here and “THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT IS READY TO SHOW IT’S HEAD”! PREPARE TO DEFEND NOW!

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  22. greatgrandmaComment by greatgrandma
    September 26, 2012 @ 10:43 pm

    My prayer is that Obama is not re-elected. Regarding this article, interestingly, I read an article today that Obama’s Iran policy was put together by Trita Parsi with the National Iranian American Council who has direct ties to the Iranian Regime. This organization is partially funded by George Soros (whom we all know is no friend of Israel).

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.0/5 (1 vote cast)
  23. Pingback: What Does President Obama Believe? |

Leave a Comment





Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer