Last Updated:October 24 @ 07:27 am

Kerpen: Farming For Food Stamps

By Phil Kerpen

Can a piece of legislation be a "farm bill" if nearly 80 percent of its spending goes to food stamps? According the United States Congress - yes.

The Senate passed its so-called farm bill — whose $970 billion price tag is 78 percent food stamps — on a 65-34 vote. There were 16 Republican "yes" votes. The House agriculture committee passed its so-called farm bill — whose $957 billion price tag is 79 percent food stamps — on a 35-11 vote. There were only four Republican "no" votes. Now Speaker John Boehner, who so far is holding firm, is coming under intense pressure to bring it to the floor. Let's be honest: it's not a farm bill. And Boehner should scuttle it permanently.

We now have one in every seven Americans on food stamps and the program is rife with waste, fraud, and abuse. The United States Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, has been running an aggressive marketing campaign to sign up as many people as possible. They are using Spanish-language ads in a soap opera style to sign up more people — and partnering with the Mexican government to reach Mexican nationals in the U.S. They are actively marketing to college students. There are reports of "food stamp parties" with gourmet meals paid for with food stamps. There are also the usual tales of corruption — merchants regularly accepting food stamps for booze and cigarettes and food stamps being directly laundered for cash.

Total food stamp spending doubled from less than $38 billion in 2008 to more than $80 billion this year. In 2008, President George W. Bush — not generally noted for spending restraint — vetoed a 2008 farm bill that he said cost too much but Congress overrode his veto. The bills currently under consideration spend a lot more than the amount Bush thought was too high.

Compare total food stamp spending over the past five years (2008-2012), which was $320 billion, with anticipated spending under the House "farm bill" over the next five years (2013-2017), which is $392 billion. That's $72 billion more than the level Bush vetoed - a 22 percent increase. The House bill does reduce spending versus the so-called baseline — the amount the government expects to spend — but by just 1.8 percent. This the Republicans count as an accomplishment and the Democrats denounce as if it were a major cut. It's tinkering around the edges. Overall, over the next ten years, the House bill would spend $756 billion on food stamps.

Quite simply, we cannot afford such a massive spending bill. We're already trillions in debt. All of this money is borrowed.

Supporters of the bill are now touting drought relief as a reason to bring the bill to the House floor. But an analysis by the watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense found that just 0.2 percent of projected "farm bill" spending goes to disaster programs. They also point out that taxpayers already pick up about 60 percent of the cost for crop insurance, which covers losses during droughts.

The drought is a natural disaster. Tragic, but unavoidable - a feature of human experience since the dawn of time. The massive explosion in federal spending and debt, by contrast, is an entirely man-made disaster of new and unique dimensions. It is a disaster to burden our children and grandchildren with staggering debts before they are even born. And it is a disaster to have one in seven Americans on food stamps, dependent on someone else to feed them. Congress needs to fix the economy so people have jobs, not lock this in for another five years.

Republicans were elected to the House to stop spending. This is their chance to actually do it.

-----

© Copyright 2012 Phil Kerpen, distributed by Cagle Cartoons newspaper syndicate.

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 8.8/10 (23 votes cast)
Kerpen: Farming For Food Stamps, 8.8 out of 10 based on 23 ratings





Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:

5 Comments

  1. csbridgComment by csbridg
    July 30, 2012 @ 8:34 am

    I know the economy is bad but I really cannot comprehend how 1 in 7 Americans can qualify for food stamps. If this is the case it stands to reason that unemployment and the economy are MUCH worse than the current administration is claiming. Oh wait, silly me I used the word “reason”. That implies logic and common sense. I forgot that that is a thing of the past.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.5/5 (11 votes cast)
  2. TexannaComment by Texanna
    July 30, 2012 @ 9:18 am

    It is because the feds have loosened the income qualifications and expanded the length of eligibility. Also, in many states, if a person is on unemployment or any other type of public assistance, they automatically qualify for food stamps (which are now known as SNAP benefits, because “food stamps” is too stigmatizing.)

    We all know about the “If the government gives it, we will come” syndrome.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 3.8/5 (8 votes cast)
  3. middlegroundComment by middleground
    July 30, 2012 @ 10:29 am

    All the manipulated figures and claims by Obama of increasing employment and an improving economy are, to me, highly suspect, but the number on food stamps probably tells the real truth. Our nation has an unemployment figure twice the official 8.2% or about 16% and maybe higher.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.0/5 (6 votes cast)
    • nickster99Comment by nickster99
      July 30, 2012 @ 11:48 am

      It is closer to 20% the real number will never be known because LBM will never let it be known! Out with obummer November 6th!

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 3.0/5 (5 votes cast)
  4. CharieComment by Charie
    July 31, 2012 @ 7:43 pm

    Phil Kerpen, why didn’t you list the Republicans who voted for this? Why don’t all commentators post the names of Republicans who vote for bills that are against Republican/Conservative values?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)

Leave a Comment





  • "Both Canada and the USA need to close the boarders agains invaders of all nationalities. We have immigration laws..." Comment by Eagle525
    Posted in Profile, or Die
  • "Satan was the author of that book." Comment by jenersea
    Posted in Profile, or Die
  • ">> And don’t forget that Congress confirms judges! << Not quite accurate. The Senate confirms, not the whole..." Comment by thedove
    Posted in Why Republicans Don't Get It

Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer