Last Updated:November 25 @ 11:06 am

North: Victory Parades

By Oliver North

Sixty-seven years ago this week, U.S. and Allied forces were racing across Germany and uncovering the deepest horrors of Adolf Hitler's Third Reich. Liberated death camps and extermination centers where millions perished were evidence of a brutal Holocaust perpetrated in the Fuhrer's "Final Solution." On April 28, 1945, Hitler's erstwhile ally, Benito Mussolini, was captured by Italian partisans and summarily executed as he tried to flee to Switzerland. Less than 48 hours later, Hitler, cowering in his bunker beneath Berlin, committed suicide. Eight days after that, Germany surrendered -- ending the bloodiest war in European history. By the second week of May, with combat still raging in the Pacific, tens of thousands of American troops were en route home from Europe for victory parades.

Thirty-seven years ago this week, North Vietnamese armor units closed in on Saigon, the capital of South Vietnam. Shortly after dawn on April 30, 1975, a U.S. Marine CH-46 helicopter lifted off the roof of the U.S. Embassy in "Operation Frequent Wind" in a last desperate effort to evacuate U.S. citizens from the city before it fell to Ho Chi Minh's invaders. The fall of Saigon ended the Vietnam War, but the only victory parades for those who fought there were held in Hanoi. The U.S. soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines who battled in Vietnam for more than a decade were welcomed home quietly by their families and comrades -- but few of their countrymen bothered to even thank them for their service and sacrifice.

Now it appears that another war has ended without a victory parade. According to an article this week in the National Journal, an unnamed "senior State Department official" has declared that "the war on terror is over." This bold proclamation was amplified by a stunning claim that the Arab Spring has been a great success: "Now that we have killed most of al-Qaida, now that people have come to see legitimate means of expression, people who once might have gone into al-Qaida see an opportunity for a legitimate Islamism."

This must come as welcome news to members of al-Shabab, Abu Sayyaf, Jemaah Islamiyah, Hamas, Hezbollah, Boko Haram, the Taliban, the Haqqani network and the 38 other violent radical Islamist groups already on the State Department's list of designated foreign terrorist organizations. Knowing that the "war on terror is over" must also be a relief to the ayatollahs in Tehran, Iran, and the brutal regime of Omar Hassan al-Bashir in Khartoum, Sudan. One can only hope the word gets out soon about the war on terror's being over so radical Islamists planting improvised explosive devices to blow up our Marines in Afghanistan's Helmand province and those ambushing our 10th Mountain Division soldiers in the shadows of the Hindu Kush will stop plying their deadly trade and just celebrate.

Unfortunately, the war on terror isn't over. The White House tried to "clarify" the State Department's ludicrous claim -- but as usual, it got it wrong. After the National Journal piece hit the wires, White House spokesman Tommy Vietor insisted: "We absolutely have never said our war against al-Qaida is over. We are prosecuting that war at an unprecedented pace."

And therein is the problem. The Obama administration cannot seem to figure out who our enemies really are. The once global terror organization known as al-Qaida is indeed just a shell of what it was when we were attacked on 9/11. The group has been decapitated and badly damaged. Osama bin Laden's successor, Ayman al-Zawahri, is so deep in hiding he cannot order a new pair of socks without fear of a Reaper or Predator dropping a Hellfire missile on his head.

Al-Qaida is just one of more than 80 hyper-violent radical Islamist organizations committing acts of terrorism around the world today. Al-Qaida could disappear tomorrow, but the war being waged against the West by radical Islamists wouldn't be over. American civilians still would be their No. 1 target. That's why Obama's pledge to "end these wars responsibly" by 2014 makes no sense.

Whether our president realizes it or not, radical Islamic militants from the islands of the South Pacific to Africa's Sahel are committed to their jihad. Those ruling in Iran -- while they rush to build nuclear weapons -- aren't deterred by flowery rhetoric from a Nobel laureate or "sanctions" from the U.N. Neither are the radical Islamists who are striving for power in Egypt, Syria, Yemen and the "stans" as they terrorize Muslims and Christians alike.

The words "win" and "triumph" are rarely heard in Washington today. That means a victory parade for the young Americans who have been fighting this war for more than a decade is unlikely. Before declaring that this war is "over," the O-Team ought to recall the words of Ronald Reagan: "There's no argument over the choice between peace and war, but there's only one guaranteed way you can have peace -- and you can have it in the next second: surrender."


Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, and the author of "American Heroes in Special Operations."


VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 9.9/10 (17 votes cast)
North: Victory Parades, 9.9 out of 10 based on 17 ratings

Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:


  1. cxComment by genesal
    April 27, 2012 @ 1:48 pm

    Thanks, Colonel North, Patriot!

    First of all I don’t think we’re doing any better on the ‘war on terrorism’ as we are on the ‘war of drugs’.

    I never once that the Bush admin was involved in 9/11 (truther)but
    If we were to be hit in the future I would, yes, be inclined to believe that the NOBama admin would be involved.

    We practically embrace groups such as the ‘Muslim Brotherhood’, CAIR, and other groups in America. But here’s the real story, or part of it and why we are losing that war. And it we believe that the ‘Arab Spring’ and the take over by the Muslim Brotherhood is a good thing, then I think I can safely say Iran is harmless, Not!

    Losing the Jihadists’ War on America

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 4.3/5 (6 votes cast)
  2. JMDComment by JMD
    April 27, 2012 @ 4:11 pm

    I think Vince Flynn said it best in his book, “Protect and Defend:” Basically, the Islamists don’t mind sanctions; sanctions play right into their hands. In prosperity, it’s harder to get people to participate in jihad; the privations that sanctions cause drive frustrated people to do something, ANYTHING, to make things better. The only area natives who seem to fully understand the true nature of the situation are the Kurds!

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)

Leave a Comment

  • "Funny how it increased and the situation has worsened since these colleges began receiving federal money. Another priority for..." Comment by proudoftheusa
    Posted in The Death of Free Speech
  • "Obama must NOT be allowed to get away with this BLATANT unlawful THEFT. Congress EXPRESSLY forbade this kind of bail-out,..." Comment by oleteabag
    Posted in Stop Obama's Backdoor Insurance Company Bailout
  • "" ... "the Obama administration quietly promised to bail out insurers for their losses" ... " He can't give them money..." Comment by vietnamvet
    Posted in Stop Obama's Backdoor Insurance Company Bailout

Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer