Last Updated:November 24 @ 11:47 am

Salvato: If Debt Is the Enemy Then There Are Traitors Among Us

By Frank Salvato

The so-called “debt ceiling default crisis” continues to loom, with enough Progressive-Leftist demagoguery in the air to choke a horse, or, in this case, kill an economy. I roll my eyes at the term “debt ceiling default crisis” because the honest man – an increasingly rare species in federal government – understands that there can only be a crisis should President Obama choose to create one. That said, Republicans, TEA Partiers and Conservatives are in danger of doing the right thing in refusing to enable more debt, but losing the public relations war to what amounts to the traitors among us due to chronic messaging impotency.

According to the Daily Treasury Statements, approximately sixty percent of every dollar gleaned by the US government comes to it in the form of revenue generated by taxes. This amounts to roughly $200 billion a month. Given that the debt interest due per month is approximately $29 billion, even a third grader from an under-achieving inner-city Atlanta public school can deduce that there is absolutely no possibility of the United States defaulting on its debt interest payments. The “debt ceiling default crisis” is not so much; it is a ruse, a canard, a is a lie.

Doing some simple math – again, at a level understood by an Atlanta public school third grader – we subtract $29 billion from $200 billion to find that we have $171 billion a month left over with which to pay off other debts, liabilities and operational costs incurred by the federal government.

Now, according to the Bipartisan Policy Center, during any given month, Social Security outlays equal approximately $49.2 billion, and Medicare and Medicaid payments total about $50 billion. Subtracted from the $171 billion remaining after payment on debt interest, that leaves the federal government, each month, with $71.8 billion left to spend.

So, if the government employs a prioritized debt payment schedule – which, pathetically and due completely to political opportunism, they do not – there should be absolutely no chance of the federal government defaulting on debt interest payments, Social Security payments or Medicare and Medicaid payments. With this understood we can safely declare that a fiscally responsible administration would have no reason – other than political gain – to deny seniors and Social Security recipients their payments.

Now, what can be done with the remaining $71.8 billion that the government gleans each month from tax revenue alone (remember, this does not include money they insist they have to borrow)?

The federally elected spendthrifts can pay $2.9 billion in active military salaries and another $2.9 billion for Veteran’s Affairs and still have $66 billion on hand. From there they can pick any number of liabilities to fund: IRS refunds, food stamps and welfare, unemployment benefits, the Department of Education, the EPA, etc.

So, with this sourced and understood as fact, not only is there no possible way for the United States government to default on its debt interest payments, it would be impossible – but for politically motivated action initiated by President Obama himself – not to be able to pay Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid payments. Additionally, obligations to our soldiers and veterans can easily be met, maintaining the ability to partially fund non-constitutionally mandated programs; programs seemingly necessary as political payola for use by the professionally elected class, i.e. Chuckie Schumer, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the taxpayer-funded public trough feeders.

All of this is contingent on the federal government prioritizing their expenditures. The key word here is “prioritizing,” something that, as I stated earlier, the political class in Washington does not want to do. Why? Because to prioritize expenditures is to leave unprotected special interest “bribe spending”; by that I mean tailor-made programs that benefit special interest groups that, in turn, make campaign contributions to those who gleaned federal funding from the pockets of taxpayers for the special interest groups in the first place. It’s a vicious, unethical, almost criminal cycle that increasingly eats up taxpayer dollars the longer it goes on. It is exactly what is wrong with government today and it is exactly why we have arrived at this moment and situation.

Last election cycle, Progressives and Democrats received a “shellacking” at the polls specifically because the American people effectively sent a message that the days of freeloader political spending were over. In the ultimate polling – that done at the ballot box and not by some corrupt, ideologically bent mainstream media outlet – an overwhelming and convincing number of Americans said, in a clear, cohesive and intelligible voice that we wanted government to: a) stop spending beyond the means afforded by the taxpayers and the taxpayers alone, b) cut wasteful and non-constitutionally mandated spending, even to the extent of eliminating whole programs and departments, and c) balance the budget.

This week, the House of Representatives passed the 'Cut, Cap and Balance' plan by a vote of 234 to 190. The bill enacts substantial cuts in spending that will reduce the deficit next year and thereafter, imposes caps on federal spending as a percentage of GDP and allows for an increase in the debt ceiling by $2.4 trillion in exchange for both the Senate and House approving a balanced budget amendment.

This bill represents – exactly and without question – the mandate sent by We the People in the 2010 election to our elected officials in Washington, DC. Yet, today, political charlatans like Chuckie Schumer call the ‘Cut, Cap and Balance’ measure “extreme” and having been crafted by “the extreme element” of the House Republican contingent.

In the run up to the vote the White House attacked ‘Cut, Cap and Balance’ as an assault on “cherished programs,” even though the measure doesn't contain any actual spending cuts but promises they will be made in the future.

And addressing the Balanced Budget amendment component of ‘Cut, Cap and Balance,’ Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a political grifter from Nevada, said the balanced-budget proposal was "the stupidest constitutional amendment I've ever seen."

I’ll tell you, dear readers, I have had it with the blatant and bald-faced lying and demagoguery that comes to us courtesy of this administration and the Progressive Movement.

The word "default" does not apply here and Progressives know it...but they also know that if they say it enough, the "stupid class" in this country (those who are either too dumb to do the homework or too lazy) will buy into it. That the RINO Republicans are complicit in this is reprehensible.

Further, would someone please list for me what the “cherished programs” are? Not one person from the Center or the Right has talked about ending anything but waste and special interest spending. Again, blatant and dishonest fear-mongering...that is unless Planned Parenthood and ACORN are defined as “cherished programs.”

Perhaps most egregious in all of this is the incredibly naive and politically motivated McConnell plan. This plan is blatantly unconstitutional for the fact that it allows for the Legislative Branch to cede the power of the purse to the Executive Branch; Congress -- and specifically, the House -- is constitutionally bound to craft, create and enact all financial legislation. Ceding power to the Executive Branch to "raise the debt ceiling" -- as does the McConnell plan -- is granting the Executive Branch powers reserved for the Legislative Branch. Lawsuits should be readied.

Additionally, and specifically addressing the President’s threat to veto any balanced budget amendment that reaches his desk; note to the constitutional scholar: amendment proposals don’t involve the Executive Branch. This should bring into question whether or not Mr. Obama is actually a scholar of the United States Constitution or some other country’s constitution (ahem).

As we stand in the aftermath of the passage of a bill that would cut and cap federal government spending and move forward into the amendment process a measure that would constitutionally mandate a balance federal budget, we see the pitter-patter of the lock-step collective that is the Progressive Movement – led by their fearless leader, the audacious Mr. Obama.

Completely ignoring the ‘Cut, Cap and Balance’ vote in the House, Mr. Obama said, “We don't have any more time to engage in symbolic gestures. We don't have any more time to posture...we’re in the eleventh hour and need to start talking turkey about crafting actual legislation that has a chance at passing.”

Please, take a moment to ask yourself, honestly; what good reason would any politician -- from either party -- have in refusing to commit to a balanced budget, in amendment form or otherwise? Why would a politician fight as if his or her very existence depended on the defeat of fiscal responsibility? How can anyone justify being against balancing the federal government's budget?? The answers are ugly....that is, if you’re being honest with yourself.

One thing on which Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians and Independents can all agree (I leave out Progressives because the jury is out on whether they want Capitalism to fail or not) is that our nation’s future is threatened by our amassed debt and by the distinct possibility that a spendthrift, politically opportunistic elected class, facilitated by the politically spineless, will be stupid enough to continue spending, borrowing and amassing said debt, all in the name of “compromise.”

Consider this. If debt is the nation's enemy, and I will go out on a limb and say that an overwhelming majority of Americans recognize it as such, then wouldn’t it hold true that anyone lending support to creating more debt is aiding and abetting the enemy?

In my world we call those people traitors!


Frank Salvato is the Executive Director and Director of Terrorism Research for a non-profit, non-partisan, 501(c)(3) research and education initiative.  He can be contacted at

VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
Rate this post:
Rating: 10.0/10 (55 votes cast)
Salvato: If Debt Is the Enemy Then There Are Traitors Among Us, 10.0 out of 10 based on 55 ratings

Don't leave yet! Add a comment below or check out these other great stories:


  1. MadeinAmerica33Comment by MadeinAmerica33
    July 22, 2011 @ 10:22 am

    Excellent, Mr Salvato .   Will Congress ever understand?

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (19 votes cast)
    • inluminatuoComment by inluminatuo
      July 22, 2011 @ 11:28 am

      It not CUT CAP AND BALANCE.,,,,its just Cut the ****” and the budget will balance on its own.


      Because the earners know the value of their own hard earned dollar which represents their finite limited spent lifeblood and time on this earth, and will spend it more wisely than the infinite bloodsucking spenders who did not earn it.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 5.0/5 (19 votes cast)
    • FreeDameComment by freedame
      July 22, 2011 @ 2:55 pm

      I believe Congress understands all too well.  Saddly, most of them ARE the traitors Mr. Salvato describes.

      VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
      Rate this comment:
      Rating: 4.9/5 (10 votes cast)
  2. newsjunkyComment by newsjunky
    July 22, 2011 @ 10:53 am

    Great article that makes a mountain of sense!  Unfortunately, there’s a myriad of traitors surrounding us these days who deliberately want to destroy our country — hence, these destructive policies.  Where will it end, God only knows!  However, I can predict with certainty that if Obama gets re-elected there won’t be anything left of a once great country that most of us still love.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (25 votes cast)
  3. inluminatuoComment by inluminatuo
    July 22, 2011 @ 11:26 am

    There was another who laid down his life so that others would live in the light of truth, justice and moral prosperity. The more this struggle goes on it appears that “In the year of our Lord 2012” all the Congressional Leaders of actual integrity will have to follow his example and perhaps lay down their political careers to save this nation from the Socialist darkness, so that this proud nation can again arise from the fiscal, moral and economic land of the dead, lead by the dark deceptive prince of Socialism.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (14 votes cast)
  4. inluminatuoComment by inluminatuo
    July 22, 2011 @ 12:38 pm

    Now the traitors in Washington are claiming that the new deal offered will save us 3 trillion over 10 years. Of course the smoke and mirror figure includes phony trillion dollar savings gleaned by winding down the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Lybia which would have occurred anyway we hope! Huh???? Can these progressive prevaricators never stop their lies and obfuscation? Let the war savings be the gravy, and let the deceptive traitors start cutting the fat off the miserably roasted and bloated American Budget and only leave the muscle to do our lifting so that finally we can;


    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (10 votes cast)
  5. JDZComment by JDZ
    July 22, 2011 @ 12:49 pm

    Krauthammer had an article in the paper this morning suggesting that a short term lift of the debt ceiling by $500 Billion would be a good idea in that it would give Congress some time to work out a REAL plan.  He suggested that Obama, who is against a temporary fix, would probably go along with something short term if he thought an agreement would be eminent. 

    So, do that to buy enough time to thoroughly wring out the potential of the CCB legislation passed by the House.  Send it to the Senate, have their debate, and try some negotiations to get it to a level where it would pass, if possible. To me, it is the only idea on the table that makes sense in both the near term and on a longer term basis, and even it does not cut deep enough. 

    Our national debt is increaseing at a rate of over 1.5 Trillion a year and will double in the next ten years, and none of the programs being discussed does much about it.  The numbers we hear are maybe $4 Trillion over a 10 year span which is aimed primarily at reducing PLANNED SPENDING and no reductions in the baseline size or operational costs of the federal government.

    Much more draconian cuts need to be made to really cut, cap, and balance our federal government spending and cut the size of government down to reality.  The only politicians showing the will to really take this on are the newcomers in the House of Representatives backed by the Tea Party.

    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (11 votes cast)
  6. inluminatuoComment by inluminatuo
    July 22, 2011 @ 7:12 pm

    Whatever deal gets cut needs to expire prior to the 2012 ectection so WE The People have a voice in 2012. Continuing to foolishly borrow more until them will just serve to dig deeper Obama’s political grave and our economy as well. That is why we need to;


    VN:F [1.9.6_1107]
    Rate this comment:
    Rating: 5.0/5 (4 votes cast)
  7. Pingback: Somebody doing their journalism job - Forums

  8. Pingback: Are you afrade you won't get your SS check or vet benefits? - Pensacola Fishing Forum

Leave a Comment

  • "Parents today tell their children over and over again how wonderful they are even for the smallest achievement. So..." Comment by Bobinms
    Posted in Who Created These Campus Whiners?
  • "True. Latest evidence? WH admin (Josh Earnest to be exact) saying the 'Republicans' are in effect thwarting efforts..." Comment by ifeelgood
    Posted in Who Created These Campus Whiners?
  • "Spot on Stephen! Fortunately MY 3 Millenial offspring are all intelligent, hard-working, tax-paying and child spanking conservatives!! Despite..." Comment by ifeelgood
    Posted in Who Created These Campus Whiners?

Network-wide options by YD - Freelance Wordpress Developer