RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) — North Carolina’s largest health insurer is suing to recover $130 million it says Washington promised but didn’t pay after it took on sicker and older customers under President Barack Obama’s reform law.
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina sued the federal government Thursday, saying it is being shorted on promised payments designed to help stabilize health insurance premiums in 2014. The company estimates that the government also will owe it more than $175 million in the so-called risk corridor payments for 2015.
That suggests the government underpayments represent about three-quarter of the company’s loss of more than $400 million on insurance policies sold on marketplaces created by the federal Affordable Care Act during 2014 and 2015.
Blue Cross has said its roughly 330,000 ACA customers use the emergency room more frequently, have more orthopedic procedures and take more expensive drugs that the rest of its nearly 4 million customers.
“We are working hard to make the Affordable Care Act work for our customers and our company,” Blue Cross CEO Brad Wilson said in a statement. “The federal government’s failure to honor its legal obligations contributed significantly to our ACA losses in 2014 and 2015 and makes it more challenging for our company to continue selling ACA products to our customers.”
Congressional Republicans opposed to the health reform law restricted the administration’s legal authority to make payments to insurers under the program. As a result, the government could pay only $362 million of $2.87 billion in risk corridor claims from insurers for 2014.
At least two other insurance companies have previously filed similar lawsuits claiming the government had no right to reduce payments it promised would diminish insurance companies’ risks for taking on ACA patients. They are Health Republic Insurance Company of Oregon and Pittsburgh-based Blue Cross plan Highmark Inc.
A spokeswoman for the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Lauren Shaham, declined comment on Thursday’s lawsuit, which was filed in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington.
Follow Emery P. Dalesio on Twitter at http://twitter.com/emerydalesio . His work can be found at http://bigstory.ap.org/content/emery-p-dalesio .
Copyright 2016 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
—-
This content is published through a licensing agreement with Acquire Media using its NewsEdge technology.
Join the discussion
While i commend them for doing this, i don’t see them actually GETTING that funding any time soon.
So if i were them, i would let the government know “Since you have failed to uphold YOUR part of a contracted bargain when you signed into law the ACA, WE will no longer hold up OUR part of that, by no longer keeping all these new people covered anymore”..
Unlike abortion on demand, Obamacare actually is the “law of the land”. I can’t see them getting away with defying Obama.
Dems already hate those “greedy insurance companies”. Nobody would stop Obama from destroying them.
But oh no! We don’t have any insurance companies left. Unless… I suppose we’ll just have to move immediately to the single-payer system (fully socialist medical).
So yeah, while I applaud your defiance, it won’t work. Let’s just wait another 8 months and do it right.
SO.. Obamacare MAY be the law of the land, but then doesn’t that mean the Government is breaking its OWN laws in not paying out what is owed?
Ok well Wasn’t this the state THAT passed Obama’s health care bill because She SOLD her vote for $3,000.00 ? Do I have the wrong state? And again IT was Tax Payers money that those votes were bought with!