• Home
  • News
  • Commentary
  • 13-Minute News Hour
  • Fresh Ink
  • Cartoons
  • The Loft
  • About Us
    • Contact
    • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • News
  • Commentary
  • 13-Minute News Hour
  • Fresh Ink
  • Cartoons
  • The Loft
  • About Us
Home » Commentary

Reasoning About Race

GOPUSA StaffWalter E. Williams Posted On 11:40 am September 20, 2018
1


So much of our reasoning about race is both emotional and faulty. In ordinary, as well as professional, conversation, we use terms such as discrimination, prejudice, racial preferences and racism interchangeably, as if they referred to the same behavior. We can avoid many pitfalls of misguided thinking about race by establishing operational definitions so as to not confuse one behavior with another.

Discrimination can be operationally defined as an act of choice. Our entire lives are spent choosing to do or not to do thousands of activities. Choosing requires non-choosing. When you chose to read this column, you discriminated against other possible uses of your time. When you chose a spouse, you discriminated against other people. When I chose Mrs. Williams, I systematically discriminated against other women. Much of it was racial. Namely, I discriminated against white women, Asian women, fat women and women with criminal backgrounds. In a word, I didn’t offer every woman an equal opportunity, and they didn’t offer me an equal opportunity.

One might be tempted to argue that racial discrimination in marriage is trivial and does not have important social consequences, but it does. When high-IQ and high-income people marry other high-IQ and high-income people, and to the extent there is a racial correlation between these characteristics, racial discrimination in mate selection enhances the inequality in the population’s intelligence and income distribution. There would be greater income equality if high-IQ and high-income people married low-IQ and low-income people. But I imagine that most people would be horrified by the suggestion of a mandate to require the same.

Prejudice is a perfectly useful term, but it is used improperly. Its Latin root is praejudicium — meaning prejudgment. Prejudice can be operationally defined as making decisions on the basis of incomplete information. Because the acquisition of information entails costs, we all seek to economize on information cost. Sometimes we use cheap-to-observe physical attributes as proxies for some other attribute more costlier to observe. The cheaply observed fact that a person is a male or female can serve as a proxy for an unobserved attribute such as strength, aggressiveness or speed in running.

You Might Like
Learn more about RevenueStripe...

In the late 1990s, a black taxi commissioner in Washington, D.C., warned cabbies against going into low-income black neighborhoods and picking up “dangerous-looking” passengers whom she described as young black males dressed a certain way. Some pizza deliverers in St. Louis who were black complained about delivering pizzas to black neighborhoods for fear of being assaulted or robbed. In 1993, the Rev. Jesse Jackson was reported as saying that he is relieved when he learns that youthful footsteps walking behind him at night are white and not black.

Here’s the question: Does the wariness of Washington’s predominantly black cabbies to pick up “dangerous-looking” black males or black pizza deliverers’ not wanting to deliver to some black neighborhoods or Rev. Jackson’s feeling a sense of relief when the youthful footsteps behind him are those of white youngsters instead of black say anything unambiguous about whether cabbies, pizza deliverers and Jackson like or dislike blacks? It’s a vital and often overlooked point — namely, that watching a person’s prejudicial (prejudging) behavior alone can tell us nothing unambiguous about that person’s racial tastes or preferences.

Consider policing. Suppose a chief of police is trying to capture culprits who break in to autos to steal electronic equipment. Suppose further that you see him focusing most of his investigative resources on young males between the ages of 15 and 25. He spends none of his investigative resources on females of any age and very few on men who are 40 or older. By watching his “profiling” behavior — prejudging behavior — would you conclude that he likes females and older males and dislikes males between the ages of 15 and 25? I think that it would take outright idiocy to reach such a conclusion. The police chief is simply playing the odds based on the evidence he has gathered through experience that breaking in to autos tends to be a young man’s fancy.

Walter E. Williams is a professor of economics at George Mason University. To find out more about Walter E. Williams and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate webpage at www.creators.com.

VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 10.0/10 (4 votes cast)
Reasoning About Race, 10.0 out of 10 based on 4 ratings
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
0
Shares
  • Share On Facebook
  • Tweet It




1 Comment

ltuser
ltuser
2:42 pm September 20, 2018 at 2:42 pm
Log in to Reply

Very nice article Walter.. It used to be discrimination was seen as a Positive trait. Now days its used as a hammer by the left to compel certain behavior.

VN:D [1.9.6_1107]
Rating: 5.0/5 (3 votes cast)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • Login or Register

    • Click here to login or use the link below to register and start making comments.
    • Register
    • You can also make comments using one of your existing social media accounts.
  • Comment using:

  • Get our Newsletter!

    Sign up for our daily newsletter. It's free!
    Click here to subscribe.
  • advertisement
  • Hot Topics

    • Here's what Trump should do with the border deal Here’s what Trump should do with the border deal 74 comments
    • Pelosi warns Democrat president could declare national emergency on guns Pelosi warns Democrat president could declare national emergency on guns 46 comments
    • Open Border Advocates Use Butterflies and Birds as Excuse to Stop Border Security Open Border Advocates Use Butterflies and Birds as Excuse to Stop Border Security 46 comments
    • NYC to lose billions as Amazon pulls plug after leftwing opposition NYC to lose billions as Amazon pulls plug after leftwing opposition 45 comments
    • Democrat Cory Booker says meat-eating will destroy planet Democrat Cory Booker says meat-eating will destroy planet 43 comments
  • Recent Comments

    • "Ben Shapiro reported that Jussie’s charachter was slated to be written out of the show. As soon as his story broke, the studio backed away from those plans. So, in the end... it’s the same motivation as so many other liberal scams. GREED and a willingness to claim victim hood by lying." Comment by Outdrzman
      Posted in Media: Bring us your Anti-Trump stories; Facts are optional
    • "Ya, and it won't be an amazon box!" Comment by pumpkinjack
      Posted in Thank a Democrat: Long Island City biz community loses big amid Amazon exit
    • "You've got a point, there. It would be something to see New Yorkers vote out the mayor, the gov, and OAC. Now THAT would be news!" Comment by pumpkinjack
      Posted in Thank a Democrat: Long Island City biz community loses big amid Amazon exit

  • Bringing the Conservative Message to America

    Get our Newsletter!

    Sign up for our daily newsletter. It’s free!
    Click here to subscribe.

  • Hot Topics

    • DACA Activist: Pledge of Allegiance 'rooted in ... white supremacy' DACA Activist: Pledge of Allegiance ‘rooted in … white supremacy’ 141 comments
    • Louis Farrakhan calls for separate state for Black Americans, says that's 'what God wants' Louis Farrakhan calls for separate state for Black Americans, says that’s ‘what God wants’ 138 comments
    • Green New Deal:  Say Goodbye to Your Farting Cows and Airplanes Green New Deal: Say Goodbye to Your Farting Cows and Airplanes 122 comments
    • Still bitter Meghan McCain slams Jared and Ivanka for coming to her father's funeral; promises never to forget Still bitter Meghan McCain slams Jared and Ivanka for coming to her father’s funeral; promises never to forget 114 comments
    • Nike responds to thousands of angry Muslims who want 'blasphemous' shoe recalled Nike responds to thousands of angry Muslims who want ‘blasphemous’ shoe recalled 105 comments
  • advertise

Press enter/return to begin your search